Coolpad Mega 3

Ausstattung / Datenblatt

Preisvergleich

Testberichte für das Coolpad Mega 3

Cool Mega 3 review: Do you really need a triple SIM phone?
Quelle: The Indian Express EN→DE Archive.org version
The Mega 3 comes with three SIM card holders, which work quite well and in sync with each other. However, I feel the company has traded off a couple of important features such as a good camera, and battery to put in the three SIM card functionality. Ask yourself if you really need three SIM cards in a phone? If yes, then this is your only solution.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 12.02.2017

59% Coolpad Mega 3 Review
Quelle: Think Digit EN→DE Archive.org version
The Coolpad Mega 3 will appeal to the niche audience who require more than two SIM card slots on their phone, but beyond that it is a pretty average phone.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 02.02.2017
Bewertung: Gesamt: 59%

60% Coolpad Mega 3 Triple-SIM Phone Review
Quelle: NDTV Gadgets EN→DE Archive.org version
When a low-cost phone claims to have one standout feature, it usually means that other aspects of it are going to be disappointing. With the Coolpad Mega 2.5D, looks were the top priority and performance suffered pretty much across the board. This time around, Coolpad has given the Mega 3 its own unique feature, but not at the cost of core functionality.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 19.01.2017
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60% Preis: 70% Leistung: 50% Bildschirm: 70% Mobilität: 80% Gehäuse: 70%

65% Coolpad Mega 3 Review: Buy it only if you use 3 SIM cards
Quelle: India Today EN→DE Archive.org version
Coolpad has a number of phones in the Rs 5000-11,000 category and there are generally no good reasons why you should choose one over the other. But that is not the case with Coolpad Mega 3. It comes with its own flaws and does not improve on ones posed by its predecessors. But overall, it doesn't come close to the experience the Note 3 could offer in the same price.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.01.2017
Bewertung: Gesamt: 65%

60% Coolpad Mega 3 review: When a dual-SIM handset is not enough
Quelle: Gadgets Now EN→DE Archive.org version
The Coolpad Mega 3 will sure be winning hearts of those who want a budget smartphone below Rs 10,000. The handset has a decent camera, good battery life and an average display. The build is not really that appealing but not bad either. Add them all, and we think that the Coolpad Mega 3 is quite a value for money device at a price of Rs 6,999.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Lang, Datum: 17.01.2017
Bewertung: Gesamt: 60%

Coolpad Mega 3 Review: Does it deliver?
Quelle: The Mobile Indian EN→DE Archive.org version
Now for the final statement, if you would ask us, we would not recommend the Mega 3 even for the price of Rs 6,999. The smartphone though comes with decent battery life, but it lacks in terms of UI, Camera and the built quality. The only advantage one can be sure of is the Triple SIM functionality. The display is fine as well but when it comes to day-to-day usage, we have better alternatives. If you want to stick to the company, the Mega 2.5D is a decent performer or one can any day pick up the famous Xiaomi Redmi 3S. You can also wait for our review for the recently launched Xolo Era 2X which claims to be the cheapest smartphone sporting a fingerprint sensor.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 11.01.2017

Coolpad Mega 3 Review
Quelle: Fone Arena EN→DE Archive.org version
The Coolpad Mega 3 is a very peculiar device. Really, there’s not much of a competition for the phone given that hardly anyone makes triple SIM devices. If that is not something that you are looking for then Coolpad’s other devices or Xiaomi’s Redmi series might prove to be a better bet due to the larger batteries and generally higher degree of refinement.
Einzeltest, online verfügbar, Sehr Lang, Datum: 27.12.2016

Kommentar

ARM Mali-T720 MP2: Integrierte Grafikkarte für ARM basierte SoCs mit 2 Clustern (T720 MP2) und max. 650 MHz Taktrate. Unterstützt OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.1, DirectX 11 FL9_3 und Renderscript.

3D Spiele sind auf diesen Vertretern nur in Ausnahmen spielbar, grundsätzlich sind die Grafiklösungen hierfür jedoch nicht geeignet. Office Programme und Internet surfen dürfte jedoch ohne Problem möglich sein.

» Weitere Informationen gibt es in unserem Notebook-Grafikkartenvergleich und der Benchmarkliste.

MT6737: ARM-basierter Quad-Core-SoC (4x Cortex-A53) mit 64-Bit-Unterstützung und bis zu 1,3 GHz Taktrate.» Weitere Infos gibt es in unserem Prozessorvergleich Vergleich mobiler Prozessoren und der Prozessoren Benchmarkliste .

5.50": Es handelt sich um ein sehr kleines Display-Format für Smartphones. Man sollte keinesfalls fehlsichtig sein und man wird generell sehr wenig am Bildschirm sehen und nur eine kleine Auflösung zur Verfügung haben. Dafür sollte das Gerät sehr klein und handlich sein.» Prüfen Sie in unserer DPI Liste, welche Displays wie fein aufgelöst sind.

0.17 kg:

Coolpad:

61%: Eine so schlechte Bewertung ist selten. Es gibt nur wenige Notebooks, die noch schlechter beurteilt wurden. Die urteilenden Websites geben hier keine Kaufempfehlung ab.

» Lesen Sie auch unsere Notebook-Kaufberatung.

Geräte anderer Hersteller