Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron 1037U vs Intel Celeron 1007U

Intel Celeron 1037U

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron 1037U ist ein sparsamer Doppelkernprozessor aus dem Einstiegssegment. Er taktet mit 1,8 GHz und basiert auf der Ivy Bridge Architektur. Im Vergleich zu den Core-i3-, i5- und i7-Prozessoren sind jedoch die meisten Features deaktiviert (Turbo Boost, AES, HyperThreading). Die integrierte Grafikkarte basiert auf der HD Graphics 2500, wird jedoch von Intel nur HD Graphics genannt und mit 350 bzw. 1000 MHz (Turbo Boost) getaktet. Ausserdem ist ein DDR3-1600-Speicherkontroller in dem Prozessor integriert.

Die Performance liegt dank der verbesserten Architektur etwas oberhalb einer ähnlich getakteten Sandy-Bridge-CPU und somit knapp unter dem Level eines Intel Pentium B940.

Die Ivy Bridge Prozessoren beinhalten in der angegebenen TDP auch die Grafikkarte und den Speicherkontroller. Mit 17 Watt TDP eignet sich der Prozessor für kleine Notebooks und Subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 1007U

► remove from comparison Intel 1007U

Der Intel Celeron 1007U ist ein sparsamer Doppelkernprozessor aus dem Einstiegssegment. Er taktet mit 1,5 GHz und basiert auf der Ivy Bridge Architektur. Im Vergleich zu den Core-i3-, i5- und i7-Prozessoren sind jedoch die meisten Features deaktiviert (Turbo Boost, AES, HyperThreading). Die integrierte Grafikkarte basiert auf der HD Graphics 2500, wird jedoch von Intel nur HD Graphics genannt und mit 350 bzw. 1000 MHz (Turbo Boost) getaktet. Ausserdem ist ein DDR3-1600-Speicherkontroller in dem Prozessor integriert.

Die Performance liegt dank der verbesserten Architektur etwas oberhalb einer ähnlich getakteten Sandy-Bridge-CPU und somit knapp unter dem Level eines Intel Celeron B820.

Die Ivy Bridge Prozessoren beinhalten in der angegebenen TDP auch die Grafikkarte und den Speicherkontroller. Mit 17 Watt TDP eignet sich der Prozessor für kleine Notebooks und Subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron 1037UIntel Celeron 1007U
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameIvy BridgeIvy Bridge
Serie: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1007U1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Clock1800 MHz1500 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt17 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
Die Size94 mm294 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketFCBGA1023FCBGA1023
FeaturesHD Graphics (350 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (350 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$86 U.S.$86 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron 1037UIntel Celeron 1007U

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.5 Points (3%)
min: 1.2     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.22 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.8 Points (21%)
0.6 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 1037U +
2500 Points (22%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 1037U +
4824 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
6107 Points (5%)
4962 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
3165 Points (19%)
2480 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 1037U +
1304 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 1037U +
41.5 s (8%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 1037U +
1276 Points (7%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 1037U +
8.5 fps (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 1037U +
46.8 fps (13%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 1037U +
0.1 GB/s (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 1037U +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 1037U +
0.2 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1903 Points (4%)
1610 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 1037U +
21.5 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 1037U +
47.2 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 1037U +
1091 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 1037U +
22380 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 1037U +
13360 MFLOPS (10%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 1037U +
5.8 Points (74%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
4744 Points (5%)
3440 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 1037U +
1880 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 1037U +
13626 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 1037U +
1225 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 1037U +
1651 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 1037U +
4937 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 1037U +
4278 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 1037U +
3032 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 1037U +
2850 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 1037U +
3408 Points (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1037U → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1007U → 81% n=6

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 24. 05:55:08

#0 checking url part for id 3719 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3720 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 23 May 2022 13:12:29 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 3719 +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 got single benchmarks 3719 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 3720 +0s ... 0.016s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#25 got single benchmarks 3720 +0.006s ... 0.023s

#26 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.023s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.033s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.033s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.034s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#64 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.036s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.026s ... 0.062s

#66 return log +0.004s ... 0.066s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)