Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Atom 230 vs Intel Atom Z520

Intel Atom 230

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Atom 230 ist ein für Nettops (kleine Desktops) gedachter Atom Prozessor. Im Vergleich zum Intel Atom N270 fehlen dem 230 Stromsparfunktionen wie Speedstep und er hat ein relativ hohes TDP Rating von 4 Watt. 

Durch die "in-order" Architektur ist er pro Takt deutlich langsamer als ähnlich getaktete Core 2 Duo Modelle, jedoch unterstützt er bereits Mutlithreading um 2 Threads gleichzeitig auszuführen.

Intel Atom Z520

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Atom Z520 ist ein stromsparender und langsamer Prozessor für Netbooks und MIDs. Im Vergleich zu den N-Serie Atom CPUs, bietet die Z-Serie Unterstützung für Virtualisierung (VT-x) und die Stromsparmechanismen Idle States und Demand Based Switching.

Die Performance des Z520 ist sehr gering und reicht nur für anspruchslose Aufgaben wie Websurfen, Email oder einfache Office Aufgaben. Ohne Unterstützung der Grafikkarte, überfordern den Atom Z520 z.B. bereits HD Videos oder mehrere parallel laufende Anwendungen. Die Performance pro Megahertz ist im Vergleich zu anderen Single Core Prozessoren (Celeron M, Core 2 Solo) sehr gering, da der Atom auf eine in-order Ausführung setzt (er sortiert die Befehle nicht automatisch für die bessere Auslastung). Dieser Nachteil wird aber teilweise durch das integrierte Hyper-Threading wieder vermindert (die CPU gibt sich hierbei als 2 Kern CPU aus um die Aufgaben besser einteilen zu können). Die Performance des 1.3 GHz schnellen Z520 ist daher vergleichbar mit einem 800-900 MHz schnellen Celeron M.

ModelIntel Atom 230Intel Atom Z520
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
CodenameSilverthorneSilverthorne
Serie: Atom Silverthorne
Intel Atom Z560 compare2.13 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z550 compare2 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z540 compare1.83 GHz1 / 2
» Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z530 compare1.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z5201.33 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z510 compare1.1 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z500 compare0.8 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z560 compare2.13 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z550 compare2 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z540 compare1.83 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom 2301.6 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z530 compare1.6 GHz1 / 2
» Intel Atom Z5201.33 GHz1 / 2
Intel Atom Z510 compare1.1 GHz1 / 1
Intel Atom Z500 compare0.8 GHz1 / 1
Clock1600 MHz1333 MHz
FSB533533
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
Cores / Threads1 / 21 / 2
TDP4 Watt2 Watt
Transistors47 Million47 Million
45 nm0.9-1.162V45 nm0.75-1.1V
Die Size26 mm226 mm2
max. Temp.85.2 °C90 °C
SocketPBGA437PBGA441
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, EM64T, HHTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, HHT
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Atom 230Intel Atom Z520

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
230 +
557 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
230 +
851 Points (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 4528     avg: 4595     median: 4594.5 (54%)     max: 4661 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 141     avg: 145.8     median: 146.3 (29%)     max: 150.2 s
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 230 +
5606 s (22%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 230 +
173 s (91%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 Z520 +
391 Points (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
230 +
93 s (20%)
min: 113     avg: 121.7     median: 115 (25%)     max: 137 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 251     avg: 258     median: 258 (11%)     max: 265 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
230 +
3616 s (16%)
min: 5602     avg: 6153     median: 6153 (27%)     max: 6704 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 3125     avg: 3279     median: 3353 (2%)     max: 3360 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 Z520 +
min: 2608     avg: 2738     median: 2797 (2%)     max: 2808 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
230 +
1718 Points (11%)
min: 692     avg: 949     median: 1002 (6%)     max: 1099 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 Z520 +
2.7 Points (39%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
2.1 Points (27%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom 230 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Atom Z520 → 80% n=5

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 06. 16:03:07

#0 checking url part for id 463 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 462 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 463 +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 got single benchmarks 463 +0.006s ... 0.012s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 462 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#21 got single benchmarks 462 +0.024s ... 0.036s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.037s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.038s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.039s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.043s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.044s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.045s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.047s

#65 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.047s

#66 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.047s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.037s ... 0.084s

#68 return log +0.003s ... 0.087s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)