Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M 520 vs Intel Celeron M 530 vs Intel Celeron M 540

Intel Celeron M 520

► remove from comparison

Basierend auf den Merom kern mit 64 KB L1 Cache (32 KB Daten + 32 KB Instruktionen) und 1024 KB L2 Cache, der mit vollem Prozessortakt läuft.

Verbaut auf Sockel 479, AGTL+ mit 133 MHz (quadpumped 533 MHz)

Intel Celeron M 530

► remove from comparison

Basierend auf den Merom kern mit 64 KB L1 Cache (32 KB Daten + 32 KB Instruktionen) und 1024 KB L2 Cache, der mit vollem Prozessortakt läuft.

Verbaut auf Sockel 479, AGTL+ mit 133 MHz (quadpumped 533 MHz)

Intel Celeron M 540

► remove from comparison

Der Celeron M 540 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor basierend auf den Merom-Kern mit 64 KB L1 Cache (32 KB Daten + 32 KB Instruktionen) und 1024 KB L2 Cache, der mit vollem Prozessortakt läuft. Er wird verbaut auf dem Sockel 479, AGTL+ mit 133 MHz (quadpumped 533 MHz).

show full text
ModelIntel Celeron M 520Intel Celeron M 530Intel Celeron M 540
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Serie: Celeron M Merom
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 520 « 1.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 530 « 1.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 540 « 1.86 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock1600 MHz1730 MHz1860 MHz
FSB533533533
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 11 / 1
TDP30 Watt30 Watt30 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.intel.comwww.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 530 +
1615 Points (10%)
108%
1 540 +
1744 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
0 Points (0%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 520 +
3639 s (14%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 520 +
112 s (59%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 530 +
739 Points (2%)
109%
1 540 +
min: 795     avg: 803     median: 802.5 (2%)     max: 810 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
520 +
min: 39     avg: 39.2     median: 39.2 (8%)     max: 39.3 s
100%
530 +
38 s (8%)
101%
540 +
33 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 540 +
82 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 520 +
2015 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 520 +
7400 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 520 +
5078 MFLOPS (4%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 520 +
min: 1845     avg: 1942     median: 1942 (4%)     max: 2039 Points
115%
1 540 +
2231 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 520 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 530 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 540 → 101% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 19. 11:37:15

#0 checking url part for id 321 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 320 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 341 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.011s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 321 +0.003s ... 0.014s

#8 got single benchmarks 321 +0.018s ... 0.031s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 320 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#10 got single benchmarks 320 +0.013s ... 0.047s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 341 +0.003s ... 0.05s

#12 got single benchmarks 341 +0.015s ... 0.066s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.066s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.013s ... 0.079s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.039s ... 0.118s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.118s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)