Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M 540 vs Intel Celeron M 560

Intel Celeron M 540

► remove from comparison

Der Celeron M 540 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor basierend auf den Merom-Kern mit 64 KB L1 Cache (32 KB Daten + 32 KB Instruktionen) und 1024 KB L2 Cache, der mit vollem Prozessortakt läuft. Er wird verbaut auf dem Sockel 479, AGTL+ mit 133 MHz (quadpumped 533 MHz).

Intel Celeron M 560

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron M 560 ist ein Einkernprozessor für billige Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern, jedoch mit nur einem aktivierten Rechenkern. Er wurde jedoch funktionsmäßig stark abgespeckt und bietet z.B. auch weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Speedstep). Die Performance ist nur für anspruchslose Aufgaben ausreichend.

ModelIntel Celeron M 540Intel Celeron M 560
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Celeron M Merom
Intel Celeron M 570 compare2.26 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 585 compare2.16 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 575 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 550 compare2 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 530 compare1.73 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 520 compare1.6 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 570 compare2.26 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 585 compare2.16 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 575 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 550 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 530 compare1.73 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 520 compare1.6 GHz1 / 1
Clock1860 MHz2130 MHz
FSB533533
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 1
TDP30 Watt30 Watt
65 nm65 nm0.95V-1.30V
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron M 540Intel Celeron M 560
L1 Cache64 KB
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPPGA478

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
540 +
1744 Points (16%)
115%
560 +
2008 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
0 Points (0%)
100%
560 +
2008 Points (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 540 +
min: 795     avg: 803     median: 802.5 (2%)     max: 810 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
540 +
33 s (7%)
101%
560 +
29.6 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 540 +
82 s (4%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 540 +
2231 Points (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 540 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 560 → 108% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 06. 15:48:16

#0 checking url part for id 341 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 395 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.003s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 341 +0s ... 0.003s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#21 got single benchmarks 341 +0.01s ... 0.014s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 395 +0s ... 0.014s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#24 got single benchmarks 395 +0.005s ... 0.02s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.02s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.021s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.023s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.024s

#36 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.024s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#38 return log +0.004s ... 0.028s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)