Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M 560 vs Intel Celeron M 575 vs Intel Celeron M 550

Intel Celeron M 560

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron M 560 ist ein Einkernprozessor für billige Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern, jedoch mit nur einem aktivierten Rechenkern. Er wurde jedoch funktionsmäßig stark abgespeckt und bietet z.B. auch weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Speedstep). Die Performance ist nur für anspruchslose Aufgaben ausreichend.

Intel Celeron M 575

► remove from comparison

er Intel Celeron M 575 ist ein Einkernprozessor für billige Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern, jedoch mit nur einem aktivierten Rechenkern. Er wurde jedoch funktionsmäßig stark abgespeckt und bietet z.B. auch weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Speedstep). Die Performance ist nur für anspruchslose Aufgaben ausreichend.

Intel Celeron M 550

► remove from comparison

Basierend auf den Merom kern mit 64 KB L1 Cache (32 KB Daten + 32 KB Instruktionen) und 1024 KB L2 Cache, der mit vollem Prozessortakt läuft.

Verbaut auf Sockel 479, AGTL+ mit 133 MHz (quadpumped 533 MHz)

ModelIntel Celeron M 560Intel Celeron M 575Intel Celeron M 550
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Serie: Celeron M Merom
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5702.26 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5602.13 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5752 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5502 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5401.86 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5301.73 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1
Clock2130 MHz2000 MHz2000 MHz
FSB533667533
L1 Cache64 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 11 / 1
TDP30 Watt31 Watt30 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm0.95V-1.30V65 nm0.95-1.365 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPPGA478PPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-BitIntel64, Execute Disable BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron M 560Intel Celeron M 575Intel Celeron M 550
$86 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
560 +
2008 Points (18%)
95%
575 +
min: 1914     avg: 1917     median: 1916.5 (17%)     max: 1919 Points
91%
550 +
1834 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 560 +
2008 Points (3%)
95%
1 575 +
min: 1914     avg: 1917     median: 1916.5 (3%)     max: 1919 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 575 +
min: 879     avg: 898     median: 898 (2%)     max: 917 Points
98%
1 550 +
877 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 560 +
29.6 s (6%)
100%
1 575 +
min: 24     avg: 28.9     median: 28.9 (6%)     max: 33.8 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 575 +
54 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 550 +
2133 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 550 +
7680 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 550 +
6360 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 550 +
2363 Points (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 560 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 575 → 95% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 550 → 91% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 04. 07:25:58

#0 checking url part for id 395 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 430 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 342 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#24 composed specs +0s ... 0.004s

#25 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 395 +0s ... 0.005s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#28 got single benchmarks 395 +0.006s ... 0.011s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 430 +0s ... 0.011s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#31 got single benchmarks 430 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#32 getting avg benchmarks for device 342 +0s ... 0.019s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#34 got single benchmarks 342 +0.006s ... 0.025s

#35 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.026s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#53 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.03s

#54 return log +0s ... 0.03s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)