Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron M 585 vs Intel Celeron M 520

Intel Celeron M 585

Der Intel Celeron M 585 ist ein Einkernprozessor für billige Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Merom Kern, jedoch mit nur einem aktivierten Rechenkern (sozusagen ein T3400 mit nur einem Kern). Er wurde jedoch funktionsmäßig stark abgespeckt und bietet z.B. auch weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Speedstep).

Intel Celeron M 520

► remove from comparison

Basierend auf den Merom kern mit 64 KB L1 Cache (32 KB Daten + 32 KB Instruktionen) und 1024 KB L2 Cache, der mit vollem Prozessortakt läuft.

Verbaut auf Sockel 479, AGTL+ mit 133 MHz (quadpumped 533 MHz)

ModelIntel Celeron M 585Intel Celeron M 520
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Celeron M Merom
Intel Celeron M 570 compare2.26 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 560 compare2.13 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 575 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 550 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 540 compare1.86 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 530 compare1.73 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 570 compare2.26 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 5852.16 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 560 compare2.13 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 575 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 550 compare2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 540 compare1.86 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 530 compare1.73 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 5201.6 GHz1 / 1
Clock2160 MHz1600 MHz
FSB667533
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 1
TDP31 Watt30 Watt
Transistors291 Million
Technology65 nm0.95-1.30V65 nm
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPPGA478
FeaturesEM64T, Execute Disable BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, XD-Bit
Architecturex86x86
$70 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron M 585Intel Celeron M 520

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 585 +
2062 Points (18%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 585 +
2062 Points (3%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 1024m *
100%
1 520 +
3639 s (14%)
wPrime 1.55 - wPrime 1.55 32m *
100%
1 520 +
112 s (59%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
585 +
31.4 s (7%)
98%
520 +
min: 39     avg: 39.2     median: 39.2 (8%)     max: 39.3 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 520 +
2015 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 520 +
7400 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 520 +
5078 MFLOPS (4%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 520 +
min: 1845     avg: 1942     median: 1942 (12%)     max: 2039 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 585 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 520 → 98% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 20. 12:41:26

#0 checking url part for id 429 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 321 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.004s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 429 +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 got single benchmarks 429 +0.007s ... 0.012s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 321 +0s ... 0.012s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.012s

#24 got single benchmarks 321 +0.01s ... 0.022s

#25 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#37 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.026s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.027s ... 0.053s

#39 return log +0.003s ... 0.056s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)