Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-820QM vs Intel Core i7-920XM vs Intel Core i7-840QM

Intel Core i7-820QM

► remove from comparison Intel 820QM

Der Intel Core i7 820QM ist ein High-End Prozessor für Notebooks. Er bietet 4 Kerne (Quad Core CPU) welche, je nach Auslastung und Kühlung, mit 1.73 - 3.06 GHz getaktet wird (Turbo Modus). Dank Hyperthreading können bis zu 8 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeitet werden (zur besseren Auslastung der Prozessor-Pipeline).

Der 820QM hat einen integrierten Speichercontroller, welcher DDR3 1066 und 1333 Speicher direkt ansprechen kann. 

Der Stromverbrauch ist mit 45 Watt TDP (Maximum) im Bereich der alten Core 2 Quad Modelle, jedoch dank eingebautem Speichercontroller nicht höher. Durch den Turbo Modus wird der TDP jedoch eher ausgenutzt. Daher eignet sich der Core i7-820QM nur für große Laptops mit ausreichendem Kühlsystem.

Intel Core i7-920XM

► remove from comparison Intel 920XM

Der Intel Core i7 920XM Extreme Edition ist der stärkste Notebookprozessor in 2009. Er bietet 4 Kerne (Quad Core CPU) welche, je nach Auslastung und Kühlung, mit 2.0 - 3.2 GHz getaktet werden (Turbo Modus). Dank Hyperthreading können bis zu 8 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeitet werden (zur besseren Auslastung der Prozessor-Pipeline).

Der 920XM hat einen integrierten Speichercontroller, welcher DDR3 1066 und 1333 Speicher direkt ansprechen kann. 

Der Stromverbrauch ist mit 55 Watt TDP (Maximum) sehr hoch (jedoch inkl. eingebautem Speichercontroller). Daher eignet sich der Core i7-920XM nur für große Laptops mit ausreichendem Kühlsystem.

Die CPU gehört zur Extreme Serie von Intel CPUs und lässt sich daher dank frei wählbarem Multiplikator sehr einfach übertakten. Mit einem Anfangspreis von $1054 (bei Abnahme von 1000 Stück) ist der Prozessor jedoch sehr teuer.

Intel Core i7-840QM

► remove from comparison Intel 840QM

Der Intel Core i7-840QM ist ein High-End Prozessor für Notebooks. Er bietet 4 Kerne (Quad Core CPU) welche, je nach Auslastung und Kühlung, mit 1.86 - 3.2 GHz getaktet werden (Turbo Boost - 1 Kern max 3.2 GHz, 2 Kerne max 2.93 GHz, 4 Kerne max 2 GHz). Dank Hyperthreading können bis zu 8 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeitet werden (zur besseren Auslastung der Prozessor-Pipeline).

Im Vergleich zu den Core i7 Extreme Edition 920XM und 940XM, ist der 840QM mit 45 Watt TDP spezifiziert und bietet keinen freien Multiplikator.

Der 840QM hat einen integrierten dual-Channel Speichercontroller, welcher max. 8 GB DDR3 1066 oder 1333 Speicher direkt ansprechen kann. ECC Speicher wird jedoch nicht unterstützt.

Der Core i7-840QM kann dank Turbo Boost bei älteren Single Threaded Anwendungen und Spielen eine sehr gute Performance aufweisen. Durch die 4 Kerne + Hyperthreading ist die Mehrkernperformance ebenfalls sehr gut und sollte für alle Anwendungen und Spiele in 2010 ausreichend sein.

Der Stromverbrauch ist mit 45 Watt TDP (Maximum) im Bereich der alten Core 2 Quad Modelle, jedoch dank eingebautem Speichercontroller nicht höher. Durch den Turbo Modus wird der TDP jedoch eher ausgenutzt. Daher eignet sich der Core i7-840QM nur für große Laptops mit ausreichendem Kühlsystem.

ModelIntel Core i7-820QMIntel Core i7-920XMIntel Core i7-840QM
SeriesIntel Core i7Intel Core i7Intel Core i7
CodenameClarksfieldClarksfieldClarksfield
Serie: Core i7 Clarksfield
Intel Core i7-940XM2.13 - 3.33 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-920XM2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-840QM1.86 - 3.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
» Intel Core i7-820QM1.73 - 3.06 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-740QM1.73 - 2.93 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-720QM1.6 - 2.8 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-940XM2.13 - 3.33 GHz4 / 88 MB
» Intel Core i7-920XM2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-840QM1.86 - 3.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-820QM1.73 - 3.06 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-740QM1.73 - 2.93 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-720QM1.6 - 2.8 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-940XM2.13 - 3.33 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-920XM2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
» Intel Core i7-840QM1.86 - 3.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-820QM1.73 - 3.06 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-740QM1.73 - 2.93 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i7-720QM1.6 - 2.8 GHz4 / 86 MB
Clock1730 - 3060 MHz2000 - 3200 MHz1860 - 3200 MHz
FSB250025002500
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 84 / 8
TDP45 Watt55 Watt45 Watt
Transistors774 Million774 Million774 Million
Technology45 nm45 nm45 nm
Die Size296 mm2296 mm2296 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C100 °C
SocketRPGA989RPGA989RPGA989
Architecturex86x86x86
$546 U.S.$1054 U.S.$568 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core i7 820QMIntel Core i7 920XMIntel Core i7 840QM
Features2.5 GT/s DMI, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enahnced Speedstep Technology, Enhanced Halt State (C1E), 64, Turbo Boost, Hyper-Threading, Trusted Execution Technologyintegrated DDR3-1066/1333 dual-channel memory controller, Turbo Boost, Hyper Threading, Virtualization Technology VT-x / VT-d, Trusted Execution Technology, Intel 64, Idel States, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.95     avg: 3.1     median: 3 (5%)     max: 3.44 Points
min: 3.41     avg: 3.7     median: 3.9 (7%)     max: 3.9 Points
min: 3.21     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (6%)     max: 3.45 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3075     avg: 3457     median: 3271.5 (29%)     max: 4185 Points
min: 4310     avg: 4322     median: 4322 (39%)     max: 4334 Points
min: 3354     avg: 3426     median: 3438.5 (31%)     max: 3474 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 8341     avg: 9174     median: 8559 (12%)     max: 11966 Points
min: 11792     avg: 11916     median: 11916 (16%)     max: 12040 Points
min: 9007     avg: 9316     median: 9266 (13%)     max: 9726 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 10222     avg: 10498     median: 10317 (9%)     max: 11311 Points
min: 11420     avg: 12682     median: 13235 (12%)     max: 13390 Points
min: 11085     avg: 11521     median: 11513 (10%)     max: 11857 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3709     avg: 3952     median: 3987 (24%)     max: 4101 Points
min: 2633     avg: 3717     median: 4197 (26%)     max: 4320 Points
min: 4083     avg: 4200     median: 4199 (26%)     max: 4319 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 424     avg: 1140     median: 1361.5 (16%)     max: 1412 s
min: 312     avg: 727     median: 600 (7%)     max: 1269 s
min: 476.7     avg: 1014     median: 1282 (15%)     max: 1284 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 13.73     avg: 35.2     median: 42 (8%)     max: 43 s
min: 9.7     avg: 22.8     median: 19 (4%)     max: 39.78 s
min: 15.78     avg: 32     median: 40 (8%)     max: 40.2 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3053     avg: 3226     median: 3149 (7%)     max: 3629 Points
min: 3591     avg: 3816     median: 3797 (8%)     max: 4078 Points
min: 3435     avg: 3519     median: 3531.5 (8%)     max: 3577 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
14 s (3%)
13 s (3%)
min: 13     avg: 13.1     median: 13 (3%)     max: 13.26 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 31     avg: 31.7     median: 32 (1%)     max: 32 s
31 s (1%)
min: 29     avg: 29.4     median: 29 (1%)     max: 30.11 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 765     avg: 787     median: 780 (3%)     max: 817 s
719 s (3%)
min: 728     avg: 734     median: 737 (3%)     max: 738 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 920XM +
48000 MIPS (23%)
114%
1 840QM +
54820 MIPS (26%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 920XM +
43210 MFLOPS (33%)
88%
1 840QM +
38190 MFLOPS (29%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 820QM +
7734 Points (49%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
min: 7.1     avg: 7.2     median: 7.2 (92%)     max: 7.2 Points
min: 7.2     avg: 7.3     median: 7.3 (94%)     max: 7.3 Points
7.2 Points (92%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 10851     avg: 11570     median: 11251.5 (11%)     max: 12631 Points
min: 11552     avg: 13318     median: 14150 (14%)     max: 14253 Points
min: 12224     avg: 14498     median: 12238 (12%)     max: 19033 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 820QM +
4002 Points (14%)
117%
1 840QM +
4686 Points (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-820QM → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-920XM → 115% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-840QM → 105% n=13

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 14. 20:40:50

#0 checking url part for id 518 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 517 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 975 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.011s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.011s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 518 +0s ... 0.012s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.012s

#21 got single benchmarks 518 +0.022s ... 0.034s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 517 +0s ... 0.035s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#24 got single benchmarks 517 +0.011s ... 0.046s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 975 +0.001s ... 0.047s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.047s

#27 got single benchmarks 975 +0.011s ... 0.058s

#28 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.058s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#127 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#129 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#133 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#134 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#136 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#138 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#140 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#141 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#142 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#144 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#146 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#148 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#153 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#155 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#159 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#164 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#166 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#169 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#170 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#171 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#172 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.074s

#173 return log +0s ... 0.074s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)