Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A6x vs ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz

Apple A6x

Der Apple A6x ist ein Zwei-Kern-SoC (System-on-a-Chip), mit ARM-kompatiblen Rechenkernen. Beim A6X handelt se sich wie beim wenigen Wochen zuvor vorgestellten A6-Chip um eine Eigenentwicklung von Apple, dessen Kerne sowohl den ARMv7-Befehlssatz als auch die erweiterte Version ARMv7s unterstützen. Die Strukturbreite beträgt 32 Nanometer. Die Taktfrequenz ist lastabhängig gesteuert und geht auf bis zu 1400 MHz hoch. 

Wie beim Vorgänger, dem A5X, deutet das X im Namen auf die gegenüber dem im iPhone 5 verbauten A6-Chip stärkere Grafikeinheit hin. Während die GPU des A6 mit drei Rechenkernen auskommen muss, verfügt der A6X über deren vier. Zudem verbaut Apple eine neue Version des Grafikchips aus dem Hause Imagination. Es handelt sich um den PowerVR SGX554MP4.

Zum Einsatz kommt der Apple A6X erstmals im iPad 4, das am 02. November 2012 auf den Markt kam. Im Verglich zum A5X-Chip aus dem iPad 3 sorgt der A6X etwa für  eine Verdopplung der Performance bei CPU und GPU.

ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz

► remove from comparison

ModelApple A6xARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz
SeriesApple
Serie:
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4
» Apple A6x1.4 GHz2
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2
Apple S5 compare2 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2
ARM Cortex-M4 compare
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare
DK3.5+ST compare2
unknown compare
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4
Apple A6x1.4 GHz2
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2
Apple S5 compare2 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
» ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2
ARM Cortex-M4 compare
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare
DK3.5+ST compare2
unknown compare
Clock1400 MHz1200 MHz
Cores / Threads21 / 1
Technology32 nm
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 A6x +
8647 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 A6x +
8627 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 A6x +
8850 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 A6x +
1424 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 A6x +
781 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 A6x +
1012 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 A6x +
2053 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 A6x +
2262 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 A6x +
1330 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 A6x +
1768 Points (5%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
A6x +
654 MFLOPS (22%)
12 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
A6x +
382.4 MFLOPS (37%)
12.5 MFLOPS (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 A6x +
895 ms (8%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
1686 points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Apple A6x → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz → 3% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 20. 07:22:48

#0 checking url part for id 3609 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3316 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:13:41 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.039s ... 0.041s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#34 composed specs +0s ... 0.042s

#35 did output specs +0s ... 0.042s

#36 getting avg benchmarks for device 3609 +0s ... 0.042s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#38 got single benchmarks 3609 +0.006s ... 0.048s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 3316 +0s ... 0.049s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#41 got single benchmarks 3316 +0.005s ... 0.054s

#42 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.055s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.058s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.059s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.061s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.061s

#58 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.061s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#60 return log +0.004s ... 0.066s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)