Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 225 vs Qualcomm Adreno 220

Qualcomm Adreno 225

► remove from comparison

Der Qualcomm Adreno 225 ist eine in Snapdragon S4 (Krait) integrierte Grafikkarte für Smartphones und Tablets. Sie basiert auf die ältere Adreno 220, bietet jedoch Direct3D 9_3 Support. Durch den 28nm Prozess konnte die Taktrate von 266 auf 400 MHz erhöht werden.

Der Adreno 225 bietet 8 SIMds mit 4 MADs pro SIMD und soll dadurch 12.8 GFLOPS bei 200 MHz Takt schaffen (25.6 GFLOPS bei den anvisierten 400 MHz).

Qualcomm Adreno 220

► remove from comparison

Der Qualcomm Adreno 220 ist eine in Snapdragon S3 (Krait) integrierte Grafikkarte für Smartphones und Tablets. Im Vergleich zur Adreno 225, bietet die 220 keinen Direct3D 9_3 Support und wird mit 266 versus 400 MHz geringer getaktet.

Qualcomm Adreno 225Qualcomm Adreno 220
Adreno 200 Serie
Adreno 225 8 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 220 8 @ 0.27 GHz
Adreno 205 compare 4 @ 0.25 GHz
Adreno 203 compare 4 @ 0.25 GHz
Adreno 200 compare 2 @ 0.13 GHz
Adreno 225 8 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 220 8 @ 0.27 GHz
Adreno 205 compare 4 @ 0.25 GHz
Adreno 203 compare 4 @ 0.25 GHz
Adreno 200 compare 2 @ 0.13 GHz
Pipelines8 - unified8 - unified
Kerntakt400 MHz266 MHz
Shared Memoryjaja
APIOpenGL ES 2.0OpenGL ES 2.0
Herstellungsprozess45 nm45 nm
Erscheinungsdatum27.02.2012 01.06.2010
CPU in Adreno 225GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus APQ8060A2 x 1500 MHz266 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM89602 x 1500 - 1700 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A2 x 1700 MHz400 MHz? MHz
min. - max.266 - 400 MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 220GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM86602 x 1700 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM82602 x 1500 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? - 400 MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
4969 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
2706 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
5402 Points (1%)
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD Offscreen
min: 6.5     avg: 9.7     median: 10 (2%)     max: 12 fps
7.2 fps (1%)
GLBenchmark 2.5 - GLBench 2.5 Egypt HD
min: 13     avg: 17.2     median: 16.5 (28%)     max: 25 fps
11 fps (18%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 225
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16
min: 5.9     avg: 6.1     median: 6.1 (0%)     max: 6.3 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 225
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 2.9     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (0%)     max: 3.6 fps
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
655 Points (23%)
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
2156 Points (19%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
2878 Points (30%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
min: 28.25     avg: 38.6     median: 38.5 (64%)     max: 49.14 fps
18.8 fps (31%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 5989     avg: 6046     median: 6045.5 (13%)     max: 6102 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 58.8     avg: 59.5     median: 59.9 (89%)     max: 60.1 fps
37.2 fps (55%)
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 2487     avg: 2839     median: 2776.5 (60%)     max: 3314 Points
1735 Points (38%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 225 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 220 → 62% n=5

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 03. 01:47:40

#0 checking url part for id 3142 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4003 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:25:55 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.039s ... 0.039s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.039s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#9 composed specs +0s ... 0.039s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.04s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.04s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3142 +0.029s ... 0.068s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.069s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.071s

#17 got single benchmarks 3142 +0.009s ... 0.08s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 4003 +0s ... 0.08s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#22 got single benchmarks 4003 +0.004s ... 0.084s

#23 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.084s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.085s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.087s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#61 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.091s

#62 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.091s

#63 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.094s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.095s

#65 return log +0.002s ... 0.097s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)