Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron B810 vs Intel Celeron 797

Intel Celeron B810

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron B810 ist ein Doppelkern Notebookprozessor für Einsteigergeräte. Er ist mit 1.6 GHz relativ gering getaktet und dürfte eine Performance eines 1.7-2.0 Celeron der Arrandale Famile erreichen (z.b. P4500).

Er bietet eine integrierte Intel HD Graphics (650-950MHz) Grafikkarte. Auf Features wie Turbo Boost, Hyperthreading, AES und Virtualization VT-d muss der Celeron verzichten. Auch einige Stromsparfunktionen könnten deaktiviert sein, worduch die Akkulaufzeit im Vergleich zu Core i3 Prozessoren leidet. Intel Insider, Quick Sync und Wireless Display wird ebenfalls nicht unterstützt.

Der integrierte DDR3-1066/1333 Dual-Channel Speichercontroller unterstützt bis zu 16 GB.

Zuerst bekannt wurde der Prozessor aus geleakten Spezifikationen von Fujitsu Notebooks (Lifebook P701, S751, S761 z.B).

Intel Celeron 797

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron 797 ist ein sparsamer ULV-Notebookprozessor für Einsteigergeräte. Er besitzt nur einen Kern und ist mit 1.4 GHz relativ gering getaktet. 

Die Performance dürfte dank der Sandy Bridge Architektur in etwa einem Celeron M 540 mit 1.86 GHz entsprechen. Daher reicht die Performance nur für anspruchslose Aufgaben.

Die CPU bietet eine integrierte Intel HD Graphics Grafikkarte, welche auf der HD Graphics 2000 basiert und mit 350 bis 950 MHz getaktet ist. Auf Features wie Turbo Boost, Hyperthreading, AES und Virtualization VT-d muss der Celeron verzichten. Ebenso wurden Intel Insider, Quick Sync und Wireless Display gestrichen.

Der integrierte DDR3-1066/1333 Dual-Channel Speichercontroller unterstützt bis zu 16 GB.

Die Sandy Bridge ULV-Prozessoren beinhalten in der angegebenen TDP von 17 Watt auch die Grafikkarte und den Speichercontroller. Mit 17 Watt TDP eignet sich die CPU auch für sehr kleine und leichte Notebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron B810Intel Celeron 797
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameSandy BridgeSandy Bridge
Serie: Celeron Sandy Bridge
Intel Celeron B840 compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 compare1.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B815 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 887 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B800 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 877 compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 compare1.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 compare1.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 847 compare1.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 807 compare1.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 compare1.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B710 compare1.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B840 compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B830 compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B820 compare1.7 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B815 compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B8101.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 887 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B800 compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 877 compare1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 867 compare1.3 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron B730 compare1.8 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron 847 compare1.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 807 compare1.5 GHz1 / 21.5 MB
Intel Celeron B720 compare1.7 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Intel Celeron B710 compare1.6 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
» Intel Celeron 7971.4 GHz1 / 11.5 MB
Clock1600 MHz1400 MHz
L3 Cache2 MB1.5 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 1
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Technology32 nm32 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPGA988BGA1023
FeaturesIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics, DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (650 - 950 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (350 - 950 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$86 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron B810Intel Celeron 797
L1 Cache64 KB
L2 Cache256 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 B810 +
min: 1.23     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.25 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 B810 +
min: 2077     avg: 2089     median: 2091 (19%)     max: 2099 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 B810 +
min: 4020     avg: 4060     median: 4079 (6%)     max: 4081 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 B810 +
min: 4995     avg: 5023     median: 5022.5 (4%)     max: 5050 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 B810 +
min: 2550     avg: 2572     median: 2571.5 (16%)     max: 2593 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 B810 +
min: 1409     avg: 1412     median: 1411.5 (17%)     max: 1414 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 B810 +
min: 44.6     avg: 44.8     median: 44.8 (9%)     max: 44.9 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 B810 +
min: 1630     avg: 1635     median: 1633 (3%)     max: 1641 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 B810 +
min: 14     avg: 21.1     median: 24.5 (5%)     max: 24.7 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 B810 +
min: 32     avg: 47.6     median: 55.2 (2%)     max: 55.5 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 B810 +
min: 762     avg: 1004     median: 1003.5 (4%)     max: 1245 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 B810 +
24210 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 B810 +
11500 MFLOPS (9%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 B810 +
5.3 Points (68%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 B810 +
min: 3750     avg: 3779     median: 3778.5 (4%)     max: 3807 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron B810 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 29. 03:49:34

#0 checking url part for id 2328 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3009 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 2328 +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 got single benchmarks 2328 +0.009s ... 0.015s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 3009 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#29 got single benchmarks 3009 +0s ... 0.016s

#30 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.016s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.017s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.017s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.017s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.017s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.017s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.017s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.018s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.019s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.019s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.02s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.021s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.021s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.022s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.023s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#63 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.023s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#65 return log +0.004s ... 0.027s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)