Notebookcheck Logo

Broadcom BCM21664T vs WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

Broadcom BCM21664T

► remove from comparison Broadcom BCM21664T

Der Broadcom BCM21664T ist ein ARM basierter Einstiegs-SoC für Smartphones. Er integriert zwei Cortex-A9 CPU Kerne mit bis zu 1.2 GHz, ein HSPA+ Modem mit Unterstützung für 21 Mbps HSDPA und 5,8 Mbps HSUPA, einen H.264 1080p Videodecoder und einen 720p Encoder. Weiters ist eine VideoCore-IV Grafikkarte verbaut und Dual-SIM wird unterstützt.

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

show full text
ModelBroadcom BCM21664TWonderMedia PRIZM WM8950
SeriesBroadcom
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9
Serie: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1200 MHz1000 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 1
FeaturesHSPA+ modem, H.264 1080p decoder, 720p encoder
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP
Manufacturerwww.wondermedia.com.tw

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
3801 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
3846 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
658 Points (1%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
353 Points (7%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
75.7 MFLOPS (3%)
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
15.8 MFLOPS (2%)
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
16763 ms (20%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1316 ms (14%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
1348 ms (13%)
2410 ms (23%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
2121 Points (2%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
3490 points (8%)
2140 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
12059 Points (28%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
180 Iter./s (6%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
4041 Iter./s (13%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
4230 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks Broadcom BCM21664T → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 107% n=4

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 23. 10:58:00

#0 checking url part for id 5948 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 23 Apr 2024 05:40:15 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.077s ... 0.078s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.078s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 5948 +0.003s ... 0.081s

#7 got single benchmarks 5948 +0.009s ... 0.089s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.003s ... 0.092s

#9 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.006s ... 0.099s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.099s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.049s ... 0.147s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.172s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)