Notebookcheck Logo

CSR8670 vs unknown

CSR8670

unknown

ModelCSR8670unknown
Series
Serie:
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHz2
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2
Apple S5 compare2 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1
» CSR86700.08 GHz2
ARM Cortex-M4 compare
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare
DK3.5+ST compare2
unknown
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHz2
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2
Apple S5 compare2 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1
CSR86700.08 GHz2
ARM Cortex-M4 compare
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare
DK3.5+ST compare2
» unknown
Clock80 MHz
Cores / Threads2
Announced
Architecturex86

Benchmarks

Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 unknown +
13 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 unknown +
12.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 unknown +
7004 ms (66%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.4 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 unknown +
3.9 Watt (17%)
012345678Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 unknown +
1.1 Watt (4%)
00.10.10.20.30.30.40.50.50.60.60.70.80.80.9111.11.21.2Tooltip

Average Benchmarks unknown → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 13. 01:33:13

#0 checking url part for id 6793 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1859 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.051s ... 0.052s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#34 composed specs +0s ... 0.053s

#35 did output specs +0s ... 0.053s

#36 getting avg benchmarks for device 6793 +0s ... 0.053s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#38 got single benchmarks 6793 +0.005s ... 0.059s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 1859 +0s ... 0.059s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.063s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#42 got single benchmarks 1859 +0.175s ... 0.237s

#43 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.237s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.238s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.238s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.238s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.239s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.027s ... 0.266s

#49 min, max, avg, median took s +0.004s ... 0.27s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.27s

#51 return log +0.004s ... 0.274s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)