Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz vs MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz

ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz

► remove from comparison

MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz

Der MediaTek MT8163 V/B ist ein ARM basierender SoC für (Android) Tablets. Er bietet vier ARM Cortex-A53 Prozessorkerne mit bis zu 1.3 GHz, eine ARM Mali-T720 MP2 Grafikkarte mit 520 MHz (Benchmarks) und einen DDR3x32 1600Mbps Speicherkontroller. An drahtlosen Schnittstellen bietet der SoC Bluetooth 4.0, Dual Band 802.11 b/g/n WLAN, FM und GPS.

Im Vergleich zum schnelleren MediaTek MT8163 V/A taktet die CPU niedriger (1,3 versus 1,5 GHz) und auch die GPU (520 versus 600 MHz).

Die vier 64 Bit Cortex-A53 Kerne positionieren den SoC im Einstiegs-Mittelklasse Bereich in 2015.

show full text
ModelARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHzMediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz
Series Mediatek
Serie: Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHz2 cores
Apple A6 compare1 GHz2 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz « 1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1200 MHz1300 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 14 / 4
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
CodenameCortex-A53
Technology28 nm
FeaturesDDR3x32 memory controller 1600Mbps, T720 MP2@520MHz, internal Display up to 1366x768, HMID up to 1080p, H.265 1080p video decode, 13MP image signal processor, WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n, embedded GPS module, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio support, ARM TrustZone
iGPUARM Mali-T720 MP2 (520 MHz)

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 8724     avg: 10042     median: 10290 (9%)     max: 10857 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 716     avg: 831     median: 867 (10%)     max: 875 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 739     avg: 852     median: 870.5 (10%)     max: 893 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 628     avg: 639     median: 640 (6%)     max: 648 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1683     avg: 1754     median: 1767 (2%)     max: 1797 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
601 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1583 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1888     avg: 1930     median: 1930 (3%)     max: 1972 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 617     avg: 638     median: 638 (10%)     max: 659 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
12 MFLOPS (0%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
12.5 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 11818     avg: 13133     median: 13321.5 (16%)     max: 14321 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2821     avg: 2929     median: 2853.5 (3%)     max: 3320 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 23     avg: 23.7     median: 23 (5%)     max: 25 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
1686 points (4%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 34714     avg: 35625     median: 35464 (12%)     max: 36602 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
4493 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
13368 Points (16%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
2432 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
20724 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
41017 Points (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 2907     avg: 3177     median: 3219.5 (21%)     max: 3361 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 4125     avg: 4345     median: 4294 (21%)     max: 4685 Points

Average Benchmarks ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz → 0% n=

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz → 0% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 12:48:30

#0 checking url part for id 3316 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8108 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.095s ... 0.097s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.097s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3316 +0.003s ... 0.099s

#7 got single benchmarks 3316 +0.007s ... 0.106s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8108 +0.003s ... 0.109s

#9 got single benchmarks 8108 +0.023s ... 0.131s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.131s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.067s ... 0.198s

#12 return log +0.03s ... 0.228s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)