Notebookcheck Logo

ARM Cortex-M4 vs Rockchip RK3288 vs Loongson 2F 900MHz

Rockchip RK3288

► remove from comparison  RK3288

Der Rockchip RK3288 ist ein Mittelklasse ARM-SoC für Android und Chrome OS basierte Systeme. Er integriert vier 32 Bit ARM Cortex-A12 Kerne (welche jedoch von ARM Cortex-A17 genannt werden, durch die vergleichbare Performance). Die CPU Kerne takten mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Weiters integriert der SoC (System on a CHip) eine ARM Mali-T760 MP4 (auch Mali-T764 genannte) Grafikkarte mit 600 MHz Taktfrequenz und einen Dual-Channel DDR3, DDR3L, LPDDR2, LPDDR3 Speicherkontroller.

Die ARM Cortex-A12 Kerne (ARMv7-A Architektur) sind die direkten Nachfolger der Cortex-A9 Cores und dank eines komplexeren Out-of-Order-Designs erreichen sie eine höhere Rechenleistung/MHz (3 statt 2,5 DMIPS/MHz). 

Die integrierte Video Engine unterstützt das Encoding von 1080p Videos in H.264, VP8 und MVC. Dekodieren kann der Chip 4K H.264 und 10 Bit H.265 Videos.

Der Rockchip 3288 wird im aktuellen 28 nm HKMG Prozess gefertigt.

Loongson 2F 900MHz

► remove from comparison

ModelARM Cortex-M4Rockchip RK3288Loongson 2F 900MHz
Series
Serie:
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHzcores
Apple A61 GHzcores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 «  cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 « 1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHzcores
Apple A61 GHzcores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple A6x1.4 GHzcores
Apple A61 GHzcores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz « 0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
Clock1800 MHz900 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 41 / 1
Technology28 nm
FeaturesARM MAli-T624 at 600 MHz, dedicated 2D processor, 1080P H.264, VP8, MVC encoding, 4K H.264 and 10 Bits H.265 decoding, 1080p multi video decode, Dual-channel DDR3(L) memory controller, HDMI 2.0
iGPUARM Mali-T760 MP4 (600 MHz)
ArchitectureARMMIPS
Announced
Manufacturer RK3288
L2 Cache512 KB
TDP4 Watt

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 RK3288 +
15496 Points (13%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 1909     avg: 2183     median: 2182.5 (4%)     max: 2456 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 698     avg: 779     median: 778.5 (15%)     max: 859 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 4753     avg: 5809     median: 5790 (7%)     max: 6884 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 745     avg: 746     median: 745.5 (8%)     max: 746 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 5967     avg: 6798     median: 7107 (7%)     max: 7319 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 RK3288 +
47100 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 RK3288 +
3888 Points (19%)

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3288 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.22
log 28. 15:11:29

#0 checking url part for id 13222 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6984 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 480 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Jan 2023 08:57:11 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.092s ... 0.093s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.093s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 13222 +0.001s ... 0.094s

#8 got single benchmarks 13222 +0.006s ... 0.1s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6984 +0.002s ... 0.101s

#10 got single benchmarks 6984 +0.01s ... 0.112s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 480 +0.001s ... 0.113s

#12 got single benchmarks 480 +0.005s ... 0.118s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.118s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.134s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.134s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)