Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

ARM Cortex-M4 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500 vs Rockchip RK3288

Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500

► remove from comparison

Der Wear 2500 ist ein kleiner ARM Cortex-A7 Quad-Core für Smartwatches der die CPU-Kerne mit bis zu 1,2 GHz taktet. Der SoC wird in 28nm gefertigt und integriert ein X5 LTE Modem. Im Vergleich zum Wear 2100 bietet der 2500 Qualcomm Aqstic Audio Support.

Rockchip RK3288

► remove from comparison  RK3288

Der Rockchip RK3288 ist ein Mittelklasse ARM-SoC für Android und Chrome OS basierte Systeme. Er integriert vier 32 Bit ARM Cortex-A12 Kerne (welche jedoch von ARM Cortex-A17 genannt werden, durch die vergleichbare Performance). Die CPU Kerne takten mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Weiters integriert der SoC (System on a CHip) eine ARM Mali-T760 MP4 (auch Mali-T764 genannte) Grafikkarte mit 600 MHz Taktfrequenz und einen Dual-Channel DDR3, DDR3L, LPDDR2, LPDDR3 Speicherkontroller.

Die ARM Cortex-A12 Kerne (ARMv7-A Architektur) sind die direkten Nachfolger der Cortex-A9 Cores und dank eines komplexeren Out-of-Order-Designs erreichen sie eine höhere Rechenleistung/MHz (3 statt 2,5 DMIPS/MHz). 

Die integrierte Video Engine unterstützt das Encoding von 1080p Videos in H.264, VP8 und MVC. Dekodieren kann der Chip 4K H.264 und 10 Bit H.265 Videos.

Der Rockchip 3288 wird im aktuellen 28 nm HKMG Prozess gefertigt.

ModelARM Cortex-M4Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 2500Rockchip RK3288
Series Qualcomm
Serie:
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4
Apple A6x1.4 GHz2
Apple A61 GHz2
Apple S52 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1
CSR86700.08 GHz2
» ARM Cortex-M4
HiSilicon Hi6262
DK3.5+ST2
unknown
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 31000 - 1.2 GHz4 / 4 ARM Cortex-A7
» Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 25000 - 1.2 GHz4 / 4 ARM Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 21000 - 1.2 GHz4 / 4 ARM Cortex-A7
» Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4
Apple A6x1.4 GHz2
Apple A61 GHz2
Apple S52 / 2
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1
CSR86700.08 GHz2
ARM Cortex-M4
HiSilicon Hi6262
DK3.5+ST2
unknown
CodenameARM Cortex-A7
Clock <=1200 MHz1800 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesLPDDR3-400 Memory Controller, eMMC 4.5, USB 2.0, Beidou, Galileo, GLONASS, gPS, Adreno 304 GPU, Bluetooth 4.2ARM MAli-T624 at 600 MHz, dedicated 2D processor, 1080P H.264, VP8, MVC encoding, 4K H.264 and 10 Bits H.265 decoding, 1080p multi video decode, Dual-channel DDR3(L) memory controller, HDMI 2.0
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
ManufacturerQualcomm Wear 2500 RK3288
iGPUARM Mali-T760 MP4 (600 MHz)

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 RK3288 +
15496 Points (13%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 1909     avg: 2183     median: 2182.5 (4%)     max: 2456 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 698     avg: 779     median: 778.5 (16%)     max: 859 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 4753     avg: 5809     median: 5790 (7%)     max: 6884 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 745     avg: 746     median: 745.5 (8%)     max: 746 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 RK3288 +
min: 5967     avg: 6798     median: 7107 (7%)     max: 7319 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 RK3288 +
47100 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 RK3288 +
3888 Points (19%)

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3288 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 16. 21:30:50

#0 checking url part for id 13222 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13232 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6984 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13 May 2022 13:12:21 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.036s ... 0.038s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.046s ... 0.085s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.085s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.087s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#35 composed specs +0s ... 0.088s

#36 did output specs +0s ... 0.088s

#37 getting avg benchmarks for device 13222 +0s ... 0.088s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.088s

#39 got single benchmarks 13222 +0.005s ... 0.094s

#40 getting avg benchmarks for device 13232 +0s ... 0.094s

#41 got single benchmarks 13232 +0s ... 0.094s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 6984 +0s ... 0.094s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.095s

#45 got single benchmarks 6984 +0.002s ... 0.097s

#46 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.097s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.097s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.097s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.097s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.097s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.097s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#60 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.098s

#61 return log +0s ... 0.098s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)