Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD E1-2500 vs AMD E1-2100

AMD E1-2500

► remove from comparison AMD E1-2500

Der AMD E1-2500 ist ein mobiler Dual-Core-SoC für günstige Subnotebooks, der im Mai 2013 vorgestellt wurde. Neben 2 Prozessorkernen mit einer Taktrate von 1,4 GHz (kein Turbo) integriert der 28-Nanometer-Chip auch eine Radeon HD 8240 GPU, einen DDR3L-1333-Speichercontroller sowie die Southbridge mit diversen I/O-Ports.

Architektur

Sowohl Kabini (für Notebooks) als auch Temash (Tablets und kompakte Subnotebooks) basieren auf AMDs neuer Jaguar-Architektur, die die Nachfolge der bisherigen Bobcat-Modelle (z.B. E-350) antritt. Laut AMD konnte die Pro-MHz-Leistung um etwa 15 Prozent gesteigert werden, zudem werden nun verschiedene moderne Befehlssatzerweiterungen wie SSE bis Version 4.2, AVX und AES unterstützt. Der feinere 28-Nanometer-Prozess von TSMC erlaubt dabei niedrigere Kernspannungen beziehungsweise höhere Taktraten, zudem werden im Gegensatz zu Bobcat auch Quad-Core-Modelle angeboten.

Performance

Je nach Anwendung bewegt sich die Performance des E1-2500 knapp über dem E2-1800 auf Basis der älteren Bobcat-Architektur. Für Alltagsaufgaben aus dem Office- oder Multimedia-Bereich besitzt der Prozessor insgesamt ausreichende Reserven, ist aber kaum für Multitasking oder anspruchsvollere Software geeignet.

Grafik

Der SoC integriert eine Radeon HD 8240 GPU, die über 128 Shadereinheiten auf Basis der GCN-Architektur verfügt und mit 400 MHz taktet (kein Turbo). Die Grafikleistung liegt etwa zwischen der Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) und der HD Graphics 4000 und entspricht knapp einer dedizierten Radeon HD 6450M. Einige ältere und anspruchslose Titel werden von der APU bewältigt, doch für neuere Spiele reicht die Performance kaum.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme des gesamten SoCs liegt bei 15 Watt und damit etwas unter normalen ULV-Prozessoren. Dadurch ist der E1-2500 auch für dünne Subnotebooks ab etwa 12 Zoll geeignet.

AMD E1-2100

► remove from comparison AMD E1-2100

Der AMD E1-2100 ist ein mobiler Dual-Core-SoC für günstige Netbooks, der im Mai 2013 vorgestellt wurde. Neben 2 Prozessorkernen mit einer Taktrate von 1,0 GHz (kein Turbo) integriert der 28-Nanometer-Chip auch eine Radeon HD 8210 GPU, einen DDR3L-1333-Speichercontroller sowie die Southbridge mit diversen I/O-Ports.

Architektur

Sowohl Kabini (für Notebooks) als auch Temash (Tablets und kompakte Subnotebooks) basieren auf AMDs neuer Jaguar-Architektur, die die Nachfolge der bisherigen Bobcat-Modelle (z.B. E-350) antritt. Laut AMD konnte die Pro-MHz-Leistung um etwa 15 Prozent gesteigert werden, zudem werden nun verschiedene moderne Befehlssatzerweiterungen wie SSE bis Version 4.2, AVX und AES unterstützt. Der feinere 28-Nanometer-Prozess von TSMC erlaubt dabei niedrigere Kernspannungen beziehungsweise höhere Taktraten, zudem werden im Gegensatz zu Bobcat auch Quad-Core-Modelle angeboten.

Performance

Je nach Anwendung bewegt sich die Performance des E1-2100 etwa im Bereich des AMD C-60 auf Basis der älteren Bobcat-Architektur. Für einfache Alltagsaufgaben aus dem Office- oder Multimedia-Bereich besitzt der Prozessor insgesamt ausreichende Reserven, ist aber kaum für Multitasking oder anspruchsvollere Software geeignet.

Grafik

Der SoC integriert eine Radeon HD 8210 GPU, die über 128 Shadereinheiten auf Basis der GCN-Architektur verfügt und mit 300 MHz taktet (kein Turbo). Die Grafikleistung liegt etwa auf Höhe der Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge), wird aber teils von der langsamen CPU ausgebremst. Nur wenige ältere und sehr anspruchslose Titel werden von der APU bewältigt.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme des gesamten SoCs liegt bei 9 Watt und damit fast im Bereich von Intels Atom-Prozessoren. Dadurch ist der E1-2100 auch für kleine Netbooks geeignet.

show full text
ModelAMD E1-2500AMD E1-2100
SeriesAMD E-SeriesAMD E-Series
CodenameKabiniKabini
Serie: E-Series Kabini
AMD E2-3000 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E1-25001.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-2200 compare1.05 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-21001 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-3000 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-25001.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E1-2200 compare1.05 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E1-21001 GHz2 / 2
Clock1400 MHz1000 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP15 Watt9 Watt
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesSSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1333SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A), x86-64, AES, AVX, DDR3L-1333
Architecturex86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - E1-2100
3.2 pt (4%)
AMD E1-2100 0%
...
AMD E1-2100
Intel Celeron N2820 202%
AMD A4-5000 312%
Intel Celeron N3350 312%
Intel Atom x7-E3950 343%
AMD A6-5200 389%
AMD A4-5150M 411%
Intel Celeron N4000 445%
AMD A10-4600M 473%
Intel Celeron N4020 488%
...
Intel Core i9-12900H 1987%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 E1-2100 +
202 Points (0%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 E1-2100 +
114 Points (6%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 E1-2100 +
min: 40.8     avg: 42.3     median: 42.3 (5%)     max: 43.7 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 E1-2100 +
min: 67.1     avg: 72.2     median: 72.2 (0%)     max: 77.3 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
44 Points (0%)
min: 33     avg: 35.6     median: 36 (0%)     max: 37.1 Points
05101520253035Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
27 Points (9%)
min: 19     avg: 20.2     median: 20 (7%)     max: 21 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.56     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (1%)     max: 0.66 Points
min: 0.46     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.48 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.33     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (10%)     max: 0.35 Points
min: 0.23     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (7%)     max: 0.26 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1052 Points (9%)
min: 667     avg: 747     median: 765 (7%)     max: 790 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2016 Points (3%)
min: 1242     avg: 1402     median: 1435 (2%)     max: 1497 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 2101     avg: 2246     median: 2246 (2%)     max: 2391 Points
min: 1668     avg: 1682     median: 1681.5 (1%)     max: 1695 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1122     avg: 1194     median: 1194 (7%)     max: 1266 Points
min: 892     avg: 919     median: 918.5 (6%)     max: 945 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
2519 s (30%)
min: 3235     avg: 3390     median: 3390 (40%)     max: 3545 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
79.6 s (16%)
min: 101.2     avg: 107     median: 107 (22%)     max: 112.7 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
604 Points (3%)
min: 482     avg: 491.5     median: 491.5 (3%)     max: 501 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 E1-2100 +
min: 1276     avg: 1358     median: 1358 (1%)     max: 1440 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 E1-2100 +
min: 850     avg: 857     median: 856.5 (12%)     max: 863 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
4 fps (2%)
min: 2.5     avg: 2.7     median: 2.7 (1%)     max: 2.87 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
20.4 fps (6%)
min: 14.3     avg: 14.7     median: 14.7 (4%)     max: 15.08 fps
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 E1-2100 +
min: 0.26     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (1%)     max: 0.27 fps
000.10.10.10.20.20.20.20.30.30.30.40.40.40.50.50.50.50.6Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0 GB/s (2%)
min: 0.0322     avg: 0     median: 0 (1%)     max: 0.034 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
min: 0.0513     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (1%)     max: 0.054 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.4 GB/s (2%)
min: 0.294     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (1%)     max: 0.306 GB/s
Blender 2.79 - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 E1-2100 +
min: 13955     avg: 14077     median: 14076.5 (99%)     max: 14198 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 E1-2100 +
min: 4.55     avg: 4.6     median: 4.6 (99%)     max: 4.63 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1021 Points (2%)
min: 745     avg: 772     median: 772 (2%)     max: 799 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
46.5 s (10%)
min: 62.8     avg: 63     median: 63 (14%)     max: 63.1 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
104.5 s (4%)
139.3 s (6%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2267 s (10%)
3040 s (14%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 E1-2500 +
12450 MIPS (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 E1-2500 +
7620 MFLOPS (6%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 E1-2500 +
3.7 Points (47%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
2007 Points (2%)
1439 Points (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 652     avg: 718     median: 717.5 (2%)     max: 783 Points
min: 582     avg: 609     median: 589 (2%)     max: 655 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 7340     avg: 8269     median: 8269 (5%)     max: 9198 Points
min: 5458     avg: 5988     median: 6089.5 (4%)     max: 6316 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 E1-2100 +
min: 5805     avg: 6032     median: 6031.5 (5%)     max: 6258 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 E1-2100 +
6042 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
686 Points (2%)
min: 453     avg: 472     median: 469.5 (1%)     max: 496 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 688     avg: 798     median: 797.5 (2%)     max: 907 Points
min: 543     avg: 554     median: 549 (1%)     max: 571 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2187 Points (18%)
min: 1823     avg: 1832     median: 1831.5 (15%)     max: 1840 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1818 Points (16%)
min: 1451     avg: 1453     median: 1453 (13%)     max: 1455 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2165 Points (4%)
min: 1552     avg: 1589     median: 1589 (3%)     max: 1626 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1617 Points (3%)
min: 1168     avg: 1181     median: 1180.5 (2%)     max: 1193 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
1905 Points (5%)
min: 1433     avg: 1443     median: 1442.5 (4%)     max: 1452 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1340 Points (2%)
min: 954     avg: 1000     median: 1016 (2%)     max: 1031 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
785 Points (16%)
min: 561     avg: 585     median: 595 (12%)     max: 599 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E1-2100 +
1079 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E1-2100 +
634 Points (13%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E1-2100 +
577 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E1-2100 +
1028 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E1-2100 +
122 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E1-2100 +
233 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E1-2100 +
min: 122     avg: 125     median: 125 (6%)     max: 128 Points
Geekbench 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E1-2100 +
min: 233     avg: 238.5     median: 238.5 (1%)     max: 244 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 E1-2100 +
min: 9131     avg: 19075     median: 19075 (22%)     max: 29019 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
835 ms (9%)
608 ms (7%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 E1-2100 +
23.1 Points (6%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 E1-2100 +
16.4 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 E1-2100 +
14.8 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 E1-2100 +
2.4 Points per Watt (3%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E1-2500 → 100% n=33

Average Benchmarks AMD E1-2100 → 78% n=33

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 20. 01:10:46

#0 checking url part for id 4150 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4151 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s ... 0.008s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.009s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.012s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#10 composed specs +0s ... 0.012s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 4150 +0s ... 0.012s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#14 got single benchmarks 4150 +0.009s ... 0.022s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.023s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 4151 +0.004s ... 0.026s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#18 got single benchmarks 4151 +0.011s ... 0.038s

#19 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.04s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s ... 0.047s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.032s ... 0.089s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.09s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.09s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.091s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.091s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.092s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.092s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.093s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.093s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.094s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.094s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.095s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.095s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.096s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.096s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.097s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.098s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.098s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.099s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.1s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.1s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.101s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.101s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.102s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.102s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.103s

#125 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.103s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.103s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.104s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.105s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#135 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.106s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#139 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.107s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.107s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#142 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.108s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#145 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.109s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.109s

#147 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.109s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.11s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.11s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.11s

#151 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.11s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.111s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.111s

#155 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.111s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.112s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.112s

#159 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.112s

#160 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.113s

#161 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.113s

#162 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.114s

#163 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.115s

#164 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.115s

#165 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.116s

#166 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.116s

#167 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.116s

#168 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.117s

#169 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.117s

#170 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.118s

#171 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.118s

#172 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.118s

#173 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.119s

#174 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.119s

#175 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.12s

#176 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.12s

#177 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.121s

#178 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.122s

#179 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.122s

#180 return log +0.003s ... 0.125s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)