Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Turion II Neo K685 vs AMD Turion II Neo K665

AMD Turion II Neo K685

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Turion II Neo Dual-Core K685 ist ein Prozessor für kleine und flache Subnotebooks und basiert auf den Champlain Kern (K10 basierend). Damit sollte er mit dem Desktop Athlon II verwandt sein. Der K685 bietet einen integrierten DDR3 Speicherkontroller und einen 1600 MHz 16 Bit HyperTransport 3.0 (HT3200) Link. Mit 15 Watt eignet sich die CPU auch für kleine Subnotebooks.

AMD Turion II Neo K665

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Turion II Neo Dual-Core K665 ist ein Prozessor für kleine und flache Subnotebooks und basiert auf den Champlain Kern (K10 basierend). Damit sollte er mit dem Desktop Athlon II verwandt sein. Der K665 bietet einen integrierten DDR3 Speicherkontroller und einen 1600 MHz 16 Bit HyperTransport 3.0 (HT3200) Link. Mit 15 Watt eignet sich die CPU auch für kleine Subnotebooks.

ModelAMD Turion II Neo K685AMD Turion II Neo K665
SeriesAMD Turion II NeoAMD Turion II Neo
CodenameGenevaGeneva
Serie: Turion II Neo Geneva
» AMD Turion II Neo K6851.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II Neo K6651.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II Neo K645 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II Neo K625 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II Neo K6851.8 GHz2 / 2
» AMD Turion II Neo K6651.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II Neo K645 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD Turion II Neo K625 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2
Clock1800 MHz1700 MHz
FSB32003200
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm
SocketS1g4S1g4
Featuresintegrated DDR3 memory controller, MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationintegrated DDR3 memory controller, MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Turion II Neo K665

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 K685 +
1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 K685 +
1424 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 K685 +
3083 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 K685 +
3839 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 K685 +
1765 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 K685 +
1410 s (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 K685 +
42 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 K685 +
1451 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 K685 +
42 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 K685 +
115 s (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 K685 +
2517 s (11%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 K685 +
4.8 Points (62%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Turion II Neo K685 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 28. 23:44:41

#0 checking url part for id 1539 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 905 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#10 composed specs +0s ... 0.003s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1539 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#14 got single benchmarks 1539 +0.006s ... 0.01s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 905 +0s ... 0.01s

#16 got single benchmarks 905 +0s ... 0.01s

#17 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.011s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#29 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.015s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#31 return log +0.003s ... 0.018s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)