Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs HiSilicon Kirin 960

HiSilicon Kirin 710A

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 710A

Der HiSilicon Kirin 710A von Huawei ist ein ARM-Basierter Octa-Core-SoC der Mittelklasse, der im Sommer 2020 vorgestellt wurde. Er basiert auf den Kirin 710, jedoch wird er bei SMIC in China in 14nm FinFET (statt 12nm bei TSMC) gefertigt. Wie der Kirin 960 und 970 integriert er vier ARM Cortex-A73 Prozessorkerne mit bis zu 2 GHz und vier Cortex-A53 Kerne mit bis zu 1,7 GHz (wahrscheinlich) im big.LITTLE Verbund. Die integrierte Grafikkarte ist jedoch deutlich schwächer und nur eine ARM Mali-G51 MP4. Der integrierte LPDDR4 Dual-Channel Speicherkontroller unterstützt maximal 6 GB. Weiters integriert der Kirin 710A auch ein LTE-Modem mit 600 Mbps Download und 150 Mbps Upload, 802.11 a/b/g/n 2.4 GHz WLAN, 1080p H.264 En- und Dekodierung, Bluetooth 4.2 und GPS / Glonass / Beidou.

HiSilicon Kirin 960

► remove from comparison

Der HiSilicon Kirin 960 ist ein ARM-basierter Octa-Core-SoC der High-End-Klasse für Smartphones und Tablets, der im November 2016 zusammen mit dem Huawei Mate 9 vorgestellt wurde. Neben den 8 CPU-Kernen (4x Cortex-A73, 4x Cortex-A53) integriert der Chip auch eine moderne Mali-G71 MP8 Grafikeinheit, einen Dual-Channel LPDDR4-Speichercontroller sowie ein LTE Cat. 12/13 Modem. Ende 2016 zählt der Chip zu den schnellsten ARM-SoCs auf dem Markt.

Der Kirin 960 wird in einem modernen 16-Nanometer-Prozess von TSMC gefertigt.

show full text
ModelHiSilicon Kirin 710AHiSilicon Kirin 960
SeriesHiSilicon
CodenameCortex-A73/-A53Cortex-A73/-A53
Serie: Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 970 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9602.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960s compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710A « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 970 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960 « 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960s compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710A2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Clock2000 MHz2400 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Transistors5500 Million
Technology14 nm16 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G51 MP4 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.2 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.7 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat-12 600 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 150 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 4.2, WiFi a/b/g/n 2.4 GHz, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouARM Mali-G71 MP8 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.4 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.8 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G51 MP4ARM Mali-G71 MP8 ( - 900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 710A
0.5 pt (36%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -65%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 -12%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 -6%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 -6%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4601 -2%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 -1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 -1%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 -1%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4682 0%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 0%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4702
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 1%
UNISOC T618
0.475 1%
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 2%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 2%
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809 2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
0.4813 2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
0.4915 5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
0.516 10%
Mediatek Helio P70
0.517 10%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 176%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 12601     avg: 12741     median: 12740.5 (11%)     max: 12880 Points
min: 14456     avg: 15019     median: 15116.5 (13%)     max: 15341 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2365     avg: 2426     median: 2411 (28%)     max: 2501 Points
min: 1817     avg: 2147     median: 2018 (24%)     max: 2552 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2441     avg: 2464     median: 2441 (28%)     max: 2511 Points
min: 1960     avg: 2151     median: 2110 (24%)     max: 2296 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 296     avg: 297.3     median: 297 (13%)     max: 299 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1256     avg: 1300     median: 1312 (2%)     max: 1332 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1422     avg: 1440     median: 1440 (14%)     max: 1458 Points
min: 1852     avg: 1875     median: 1869 (19%)     max: 1899 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5211     avg: 5232     median: 5231.5 (6%)     max: 5252 Points
min: 6173     avg: 6384     median: 6445 (7%)     max: 6527 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1935     avg: 1941     median: 1941 (26%)     max: 1947 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5629     avg: 5833     median: 5832.5 (14%)     max: 6036 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3221 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3498 Points (32%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
10491 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4894 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6201 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4122     avg: 4267     median: 4266.5 (5%)     max: 4411 ms
min: 2734     avg: 3226     median: 3149 (4%)     max: 3734 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8911     avg: 9454     median: 9453.5 (8%)     max: 9996 Points
min: 10016     avg: 10823     median: 10236 (9%)     max: 11897 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
55 Points (11%)
min: 68     avg: 70     median: 70 (15%)     max: 72 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
min: 2743     avg: 3060     median: 3059.5 (82%)     max: 3376 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
min: 4471     avg: 4481     median: 4481 (100%)     max: 4491 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
min: 7346     avg: 7456     median: 7455.5 (98%)     max: 7565 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 124087     avg: 143408     median: 146044 (50%)     max: 157445 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 10520     avg: 11264     median: 11146.5 (34%)     max: 12244 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 40636     avg: 41957     median: 42032.5 (52%)     max: 43125 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 59256     avg: 62050     median: 61700 (19%)     max: 65542 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 57275     avg: 59357     median: 58913.5 (36%)     max: 62327 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 170015     avg: 174560     median: 173306 (31%)     max: 181614 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
37557 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
35829 Points (29%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
26575 Points (5%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
69743 Points (25%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
169704 Points (16%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
182567 Points (11%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
62687 Points (17%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 256749     avg: 264076     median: 264076 (35%)     max: 271402 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
7061 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
6622 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
3345 Points (18%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
6401 Points (14%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 6287     avg: 7038     median: 7038 (46%)     max: 7789 Points
min: 6006     avg: 6136     median: 6134 (40%)     max: 6299 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 7991     avg: 8101     median: 8101 (41%)     max: 8211 Points
min: 6830     avg: 7199     median: 7341 (37%)     max: 7403 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
677 min (13%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
6.8 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
3 Watt (3%)

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 710A → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 960 → 106% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 19. 19:38:38

#0 checking url part for id 12945 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8366 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 19 Apr 2024 05:38:49 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.082s ... 0.083s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.083s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12945 +0.014s ... 0.097s

#7 got single benchmarks 12945 +0.015s ... 0.112s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 8366 +0.002s ... 0.114s

#9 got single benchmarks 8366 +0.019s ... 0.133s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.133s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.118s ... 0.251s

#12 return log +0.024s ... 0.275s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)