Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7600

Intel Core 2 Duo L7100

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Duo T7600

Der Core 2 Duo T7600 ist ein Mittelklasse Core 2 Duo Prozessor (zur Zeit des Erscheinens sogar knapp High-End) der Merom basierenden Notebook Prozessoren (Vorgänger der Penryn Core 2 Duo). Dank 4 MB Level 2 Cache und 2.2 GHz zeigte er eine gute Anwendungs- und Spieleperformance. 

Im Vergleich zu später veröffentlichten Prozessoren, positioniert sich der T7500 auf Höhe eines Core 2 Duo P7570 oder Turion II Ultra M640-M660 in der Mittelklasse ein. Spätere Core 2 Duo Prozessoren (Penryn) unterstützen jedoch einige Features mehr und sind daher etwas schneller und dank 45nm Prozess stomsparender.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo L7100Intel Core 2 Duo T7600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1200 MHz2330 MHz
FSB800667
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt34 Watt
65 nm65 nm, 1.0375-1.3V
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
$619 U.S.
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7600

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 L7100 +
1290 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 L7100 +
2294 Points (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
995 Points (2%)
min: 1972     avg: 1997     median: 2004 (4%)     max: 2015 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7600 +
min: 252     avg: 257.3     median: 260 (100%)     max: 260 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
41 s (9%)
22 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
90 s (4%)
min: 54     avg: 55     median: 55 (2%)     max: 56 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
2181 s (10%)
min: 1416     avg: 1455     median: 1455 (6%)     max: 1494 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
10503 MIPS (5%)
min: 14271     avg: 21111     median: 21110.5 (10%)     max: 27950 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
7645 MFLOPS (6%)
min: 10407     avg: 13696     median: 13695.5 (11%)     max: 16984 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7600 +
734 Points (50%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7600 +
2422 Points (100%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7600 +
2215 Points (100%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7600 +
7311 Points (98%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
3871 Points (24%)
min: 4703     avg: 4891     median: 4844 (30%)     max: 5127 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 → 145% n=7

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.19
log 28. 19:15:56

#0 checking url part for id 386 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 162 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 386 +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.007s

#24 got single benchmarks 386 +0.007s ... 0.014s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 162 +0s ... 0.015s

#26 got single benchmarks 162 +0.017s ... 0.032s

#27 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.033s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.034s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.034s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.035s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.036s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.038s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.039s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#51 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.043s

#52 return log +0.004s ... 0.047s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)