Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7500

Intel Core 2 Duo L7300

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Duo T7500

Intel T7500

Der Core 2 Duo T7500 ist ein Mittelklasse Core 2 Duo Prozessor (zur Zeit des Erscheinens sogar knapp High-End) der Merom basierenden Notebook Prozessoren. Dank 4 MB Level 2 Cache und 2.2 GHz zeigte er eine gute Anwendungs- und Spieleperformance. 

Im Vergleich zu später veröffentlichten Prozessoren, positioniert sich der T7500 auf Höhe eines Core 2 Duo P7570 oder Turion II Ultra M640-M660 in der Mittelklasse ein. Spätere Core 2 Duo Prozessoren (Penryn) unterstützen jedoch einige Features mehr und sind daher etwas schneller und stomsparender.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo L7300Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock1400 MHz2200 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP17 Watt35 Watt
65 nm65 nm1.075 - 1.250V
Architecturex86x86
Announced
L1 Cache128 KB
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
$234 U.S.
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7500

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 T7500 +
min: 0.93     avg: 1     median: 1 (2%)     max: 1.12 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T7500 +
min: 2190     avg: 2304     median: 2307.5 (21%)     max: 2389 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T7500 +
min: 4182     avg: 4284     median: 4272.5 (6%)     max: 4473 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T7500 +
37.5 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T7500 +
min: 1634     avg: 1879     median: 1906 (4%)     max: 1940 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T7500 +
min: 22     avg: 22.7     median: 23 (5%)     max: 23 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T7500 +
min: 54     avg: 54.7     median: 54.7 (2%)     max: 55.3 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T7500 +
1344 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T7500 +
min: 19950     avg: 20064     median: 20063.5 (10%)     max: 20177 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T7500 +
min: 13944     avg: 13945     median: 13945 (11%)     max: 13946 MFLOPS
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7500 +
5984 Points (80%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T7500 +
min: 2095     avg: 4545     median: 4629 (29%)     max: 5785 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7500 +
5.1 Points (73%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 08. 19:20:21

#0 checking url part for id 344 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 322 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 06 Aug 2022 13:13:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.003s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#40 getting avg benchmarks for device 344 +0s ... 0.007s

#41 got single benchmarks 344 +0s ... 0.007s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 322 +0s ... 0.007s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#44 got single benchmarks 322 +0.048s ... 0.056s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.057s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.058s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#102 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.063s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#104 return log +0.004s ... 0.067s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)