Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

Intel Core 2 Duo P7350

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Der Prozessor basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zu teureren Core 2 Duo Prozessoren, wurde jedoch beim P7350 die Virtualisierungsfunktion VT deaktiviert.

Durch die relativ geringe Taktrate von 2 GHz, ist die Performance bei manchen Spielen etwas begrenzt. Durch die schnelle Core 2 Duo Architektur, dem 1066 MHz getakteten FSB (effektiv) und den 3 MB Level 2 Cache, kann sich der P7350 gegenüber dem 2.4 GHz schnellen Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 klar durchsetzen (bei geringerem Stromverbrauch der Intel CPU).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo P7350 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo P7570

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Der P7570 ist baugleich zum Core 2 Duo P8400, bietet jedoch keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. Im ebenfalls baugleiche P7550 wurden ausserdem die Virtualisierungsfunktionen (VT-x) deaktiviert. Die Architektur des OEM Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 ausreichen. Im Vergleich zu AMD sollte die Performance auf Niveau der schnellsten Turion II Ultra mit 2.4 - 2.6 GHz liegen. Anspruchsvolle Spielefans sollten jedoch eher zu höher getakteten Core 2 Duo CPUs greifen (>2.5 GHz).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

► remove from comparison Intel T9600

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 Dual-Core CPU ist ein High-End Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zum schnelleren T9900 unterstützt er jedoch noch nicht den C1E State. Der neuere Core 2 Duo P9700 bietet die selben Leistungsdaten, jedoch bei deutlich geringerem Stromverbrauch (28 W versus 35 Watt TDP).

Dank der relativ hohen Taktung von 2.8 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen geschlagen (da Spiele aus 2009 meist nicht mehr als 2 Kerne auslasten).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7350Intel Core 2 Duo P7570Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2260 MHz2800 MHz
FSB106610661066
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache3 MB3 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt25 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million410 Million
45 nm1 - 1.25 V45 nm45 nm1.05-1.2125 V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C105 °C
SocketSocket PPGA478Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)
FeaturesSSE4.1, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution TechnologyEnhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, ExBit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P7350Intel Core 2 Duo P7570Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
$316 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2128     avg: 2179     median: 2140 (19%)     max: 2413 Points
2470 Points (22%)
min: 3060     avg: 3204     median: 3106.5 (28%)     max: 3541 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4009     avg: 4124     median: 4036 (6%)     max: 4633 Points
4600 Points (6%)
min: 5538     avg: 5936     median: 5801 (8%)     max: 6785 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 P7350 +
38.3 s (8%)
102%
1 T9600 +
min: 27     avg: 28.1     median: 27.7 (6%)     max: 29.7 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T9600 +
min: 877     avg: 900     median: 899.5 (11%)     max: 922 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1407     avg: 1734     median: 1785 (4%)     max: 1832 Points
2050 Points (4%)
min: 2465     avg: 2524     median: 2517 (5%)     max: 2598 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 25.4     avg: 25.9     median: 25.9 (6%)     max: 26.36 s
22 s (5%)
min: 16     avg: 16.3     median: 16 (3%)     max: 16.98 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
59.5 s (3%)
52.4 s (2%)
min: 39     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (2%)     max: 40.98 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 P7350 +
1438 s (6%)
102%
1 T9600 +
min: 1033     avg: 1052     median: 1034 (5%)     max: 1088 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 P7570 +
19300 MIPS (9%)
135%
1 T9600 +
min: 25986     avg: 26074     median: 26073.5 (12%)     max: 26161 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 P7570 +
16600 MFLOPS (13%)
121%
1 T9600 +
min: 19701     avg: 20127     median: 20126.5 (15%)     max: 20552 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 P7350 +
min: 4507     avg: 5019     median: 4805 (30%)     max: 5833 Points
141%
1 T9600 +
min: 5911     avg: 6761     median: 6798 (43%)     max: 7573 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 P7350 +
5 Points (71%)
112%
1 T9600 +
5.6 Points (80%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 P7350 +
min: 3825     avg: 3896     median: 3883.5 (4%)     max: 3990 Points
147%
1 T9600 +
min: 5700     avg: 5703     median: 5703 (6%)     max: 5706 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 → 109% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → 127% n=5

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 22. 12:27:42

#0 checking url part for id 410 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 567 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.011s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#81 composed specs +0s ... 0.011s

#82 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#83 getting avg benchmarks for device 410 +0s ... 0.011s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.012s

#85 got single benchmarks 410 +0.03s ... 0.042s

#86 getting avg benchmarks for device 567 +0.001s ... 0.043s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.043s

#88 got single benchmarks 567 +0.006s ... 0.049s

#89 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0s ... 0.05s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.05s

#91 got single benchmarks 397 +0.016s ... 0.066s

#92 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.066s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.067s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#124 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#132 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#133 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#135 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#138 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#140 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#143 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#146 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#148 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#149 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#150 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#154 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.074s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#162 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#168 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#170 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#171 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#172 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#173 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.076s

#174 return log +0s ... 0.076s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)