Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9900

Intel Core 2 Duo P7350

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Der Prozessor basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zu teureren Core 2 Duo Prozessoren, wurde jedoch beim P7350 die Virtualisierungsfunktion VT deaktiviert.

Durch die relativ geringe Taktrate von 2 GHz, ist die Performance bei manchen Spielen etwas begrenzt. Durch die schnelle Core 2 Duo Architektur, dem 1066 MHz getakteten FSB (effektiv) und den 3 MB Level 2 Cache, kann sich der P7350 gegenüber dem 2.4 GHz schnellen Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 klar durchsetzen (bei geringerem Stromverbrauch der Intel CPU).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo P7350 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600

► remove from comparison Intel SP9600

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 ist ein sparsamer High-End Dual Core Prozessor für flache Notebooks. Er basiert auf dem Core 2 Duo P9500, wird jedoch nur in BGA (Ball Grid Array) Ausführung angeboten zum direkten Auflöten auf das Mainboard. Dadurch ist die Package Größe des Prozessors auch deutlich geringer (22m2 versus 35mm2 beim P9500). Der SP9600 kann dadurch in sehr flachen aber trotzdem leistungsstarken Notebooks eingesetzt werden (z.B. Lenovo Thinkpad T400s). Der Stromverbrauch von max. 25 W TDP ist jedoch identisch

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo SP9600 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.53 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo T9400 und dadurch sollte sie für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

 

Intel Core 2 Duo T9900

► remove from comparison Intel T9900

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 Dual-Core CPU löst praktisch den Core 2 Extreme X9100 (ebenfalls 3.06 GHz und 6MB L2 Cache) ab und hat zusätzlich noch einen deutlich geringeren Stromverbrauch (35 versus 44 Watt TDP dank verbessertem Stepping und Enhanced Halt State (C1E)). Einzig der freie Multiplikator unterscheidet den X9100 noch vom T9900 und bietet einen Vorteil (die einfache Übertaktbarkeit per Erhöhung des Multiplikators). Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Dank der hohen Taktung von 3 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen deutlich geschlagen. Nur Anwendungen welche mehr als 2 parallele Threads effizient nutzen können (z.B. 3D Rendering) sind auf Quad-Core Prozessoren schneller. In der Einzelthreadperformance können erst die aktuellen Core i7 Modelle den T9900 deutlich abhängen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7350Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz2530 MHz3060 MHz
FSB106610661066
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt25 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million410 Million
45 nm1 - 1.25 V45 nm1.05-1.15V45 nm1.05-1.2125 V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketSocket PBGA956Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)
FeaturesSSE4.1, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution TechnologyVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution Technology, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P7350Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
$316 U.S.$530 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2128     avg: 2179     median: 2140 (19%)     max: 2413 Points
2836 Points (25%)
min: 3353     avg: 3538     median: 3537.5 (32%)     max: 3722 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4009     avg: 4124     median: 4036 (6%)     max: 4633 Points
5309 Points (7%)
min: 6318     avg: 6886     median: 7094 (10%)     max: 7247 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
38.3 s (8%)
min: 30.3     avg: 44.4     median: 44.4 (9%)     max: 58.5 s
25.1 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 SP9600 +
1863 s (22%)
116%
1 T9900 +
799 s (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1407     avg: 1734     median: 1785 (4%)     max: 1832 Points
2189 Points (5%)
2787 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 25.4     avg: 25.9     median: 25.9 (6%)     max: 26.36 s
15.3 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
59.5 s (3%)
37.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1438 s (6%)
1117 s (5%)
972 s (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 SP9600 +
23240 MIPS (11%)
108%
1 T9900 +
25083 MIPS (12%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 SP9600 +
18549 MFLOPS (14%)
110%
1 T9900 +
20460 MFLOPS (16%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4507     avg: 5019     median: 4805 (30%)     max: 5833 Points
7587 Points (48%)
8922 Points (56%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5 Points (71%)
5.4 Points (77%)
5.7 Points (81%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 P7350 +
min: 3825     avg: 3896     median: 3883.5 (4%)     max: 3990 Points
156%
1 T9900 +
6045 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 → 117% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 → 134% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 17. 12:46:13

#0 checking url part for id 410 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 500 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 475 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:13:41 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.008s ... 0.011s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.012s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#81 composed specs +0s ... 0.013s

#82 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#83 getting avg benchmarks for device 410 +0s ... 0.013s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.014s

#85 got single benchmarks 410 +0.027s ... 0.041s

#86 getting avg benchmarks for device 500 +0s ... 0.042s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#88 got single benchmarks 500 +0.005s ... 0.047s

#89 getting avg benchmarks for device 475 +0s ... 0.048s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#91 got single benchmarks 475 +0.008s ... 0.056s

#92 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.058s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#125 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.068s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#140 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.069s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#154 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#156 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#158 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.07s

#159 return log +0s ... 0.071s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)