, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P7350

Intel Core 2 Duo P7450

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Dank 25 Watt TDP, eignet sich der Notebook Prozessor auch für 13" Notebooks. Im Vergleich zu stärkeren Penryn Core 2 Duo, bietet der P7450 keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. 

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo P7350

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Der Prozessor basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zu teureren Core 2 Duo Prozessoren, wurde jedoch beim P7350 die Virtualisierungsfunktion VT deaktiviert.

Durch die relativ geringe Taktrate von 2 GHz, ist die Performance bei manchen Spielen etwas begrenzt. Durch die schnelle Core 2 Duo Architektur, dem 1066 MHz getakteten FSB (effektiv) und den 3 MB Level 2 Cache, kann sich der P7350 gegenüber dem 2.4 GHz schnellen Turion X2 Ultra ZM-86 klar durchsetzen (bei geringerem Stromverbrauch der Intel CPU).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo P7350 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7450Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2130 MHz2000 MHz
FSB10661066
L2 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1.05-1.15V45 nm1 - 1.25 V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C
SocketPGA478Socket P
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitSSE4.1, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P7450Intel Core 2 Duo P7350
L1 Cache128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2242     avg: 2389     median: 2305.5 (21%)     max: 2575 Points
min: 2128     avg: 2179     median: 2140 (19%)     max: 2413 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4121     avg: 4473     median: 4373 (6%)     max: 4863 Points
min: 4009     avg: 4124     median: 4036 (6%)     max: 4633 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 1229.5     avg: 1237     median: 1239 (15%)     max: 1242.63 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 35.9     avg: 38     median: 38.6 (8%)     max: 39 s
38.3 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1845     avg: 1896     median: 1900 (4%)     max: 1938 Points
min: 1407     avg: 1734     median: 1785 (4%)     max: 1832 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22     avg: 23.4     median: 23.9 (5%)     max: 25 s
min: 25.396     avg: 25.9     median: 25.9 (6%)     max: 26.364 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54     avg: 55.6     median: 55.3 (2%)     max: 59.6 s
59.5 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1334     avg: 1338     median: 1337.5 (6%)     max: 1341 s
1438 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 16477     avg: 18533     median: 19560 (9%)     max: 19563 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 14460     avg: 14811     median: 14700 (11%)     max: 15272 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4809     avg: 5158     median: 5055 (32%)     max: 5712 Points
min: 4507     avg: 5019     median: 4805 (30%)     max: 5833 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.1 Points (73%)
5 Points (71%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 P7450 +
5.7 Points (73%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 3804     avg: 3918     median: 3918 (4%)     max: 4032 Points
min: 3825     avg: 3896     median: 3883.5 (4%)     max: 3990 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 → 97% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 20:37:25

#0 checking url part for id 445 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 410 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 445 +0s ... 0.007s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.008s

#48 got single benchmarks 445 +0.019s ... 0.026s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 410 +0s ... 0.027s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.027s

#51 got single benchmarks 410 +0.021s ... 0.049s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.05s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.051s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.057s

#124 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#129 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.058s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#141 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#143 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#145 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#146 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.059s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#148 return log +0.004s ... 0.063s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)