, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600

Intel Core 2 Duo P7450

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Dank 25 Watt TDP, eignet sich der Notebook Prozessor auch für 13" Notebooks. Im Vergleich zu stärkeren Penryn Core 2 Duo, bietet der P7450 keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. 

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600

► remove from comparison Intel SP9600

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 ist ein sparsamer High-End Dual Core Prozessor für flache Notebooks. Er basiert auf dem Core 2 Duo P9500, wird jedoch nur in BGA (Ball Grid Array) Ausführung angeboten zum direkten Auflöten auf das Mainboard. Dadurch ist die Package Größe des Prozessors auch deutlich geringer (22m2 versus 35mm2 beim P9500). Der SP9600 kann dadurch in sehr flachen aber trotzdem leistungsstarken Notebooks eingesetzt werden (z.B. Lenovo Thinkpad T400s). Der Stromverbrauch von max. 25 W TDP ist jedoch identisch

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo SP9600 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.53 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo T9400 und dadurch sollte sie für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

 

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7450Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2130 MHz2530 MHz
FSB10661066
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1.05-1.15V45 nm1.05-1.15V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478BGA956
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution Technology, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P7450Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600
L1 Cache128 KB
$316 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2242     avg: 2389     median: 2305.5 (21%)     max: 2575 Points
2836 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4121     avg: 4473     median: 4373 (6%)     max: 4863 Points
5309 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1229.5     avg: 1237     median: 1239 (15%)     max: 1242.63 s
1863 s (22%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 35.9     avg: 38     median: 38.6 (8%)     max: 39 s
min: 30.3     avg: 44.4     median: 44.4 (9%)     max: 58.485 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1845     avg: 1896     median: 1900 (4%)     max: 1938 Points
2189 Points (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22     avg: 23.4     median: 23.9 (5%)     max: 25 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 54     avg: 55.6     median: 55.3 (2%)     max: 59.6 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1334     avg: 1338     median: 1337.5 (6%)     max: 1341 s
1117 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 16477     avg: 18533     median: 19560 (9%)     max: 19563 MIPS
23240 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 14460     avg: 14811     median: 14700 (11%)     max: 15272 MFLOPS
18549 MFLOPS (14%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4809     avg: 5158     median: 5055 (32%)     max: 5712 Points
7587 Points (48%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.1 Points (73%)
5.4 Points (77%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 P7450 +
5.7 Points (73%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 P7450 +
min: 3804     avg: 3918     median: 3918 (4%)     max: 4032 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 → 113% n=12

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 23. 17:25:42

#0 checking url part for id 445 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 500 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 445 +0s ... 0.01s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.011s

#48 got single benchmarks 445 +0.023s ... 0.034s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 500 +0s ... 0.034s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#51 got single benchmarks 500 +0.005s ... 0.04s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.04s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.041s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.048s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#120 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.05s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#122 return log +0.004s ... 0.054s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)