Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P9500

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Der P7550 ist baugleich zum Core 2 Duo P8400 und P7570, bietet jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen (VT-x) und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. Die Architektur des OEM Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 ausreichen. Im Vergleich zu AMD sollte die Performance auf Niveau der schnellsten Turion II Ultra mit 2.4 - 2.6 GHz liegen. Anspruchsvolle Spielefans sollten jedoch eher zu höher getakteten Core 2 Duo CPUs greifen (>2.5 GHz).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo P9500

► remove from comparison Intel P9500

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 ist ein sparsamer Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der oberen Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der Prozessor wurde später vom 2.63 GHz schnellen P9600 zum selben Startpreis abgelöst, welcher ebenfalls nur 25 Watt braucht. 

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo P9500 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.53 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo T9400 und dadurch sollte sie für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo P9500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2260 MHz2530 MHz
FSB10661066
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478BGA479, PGA478
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, ExBitVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo P9500
L1 Cache128 KB
$348 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2439 Points (22%)
min: 2758     avg: 2944     median: 2901 (26%)     max: 3234 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4645 Points (6%)
min: 5245     avg: 5607     median: 5501.5 (8%)     max: 6104 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P7550 +
1112 s (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
35.6 s (7%)
30.5 s (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2004 Points (4%)
min: 1687     avg: 2198     median: 2311 (5%)     max: 2350 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.7 s (5%)
min: 17.67     avg: 18     median: 18 (4%)     max: 18.31 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
53.6 s (2%)
min: 42.49     avg: 43.2     median: 43.2 (2%)     max: 43.91 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1278 s (6%)
1101 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
17680 MIPS (8%)
23667 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
16630 MFLOPS (13%)
17820 MFLOPS (14%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4946 Points (31%)
min: 4598     avg: 6203     median: 6250 (39%)     max: 7387 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 P9500 +
5.4 Points (77%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 P9500 +
min: 5060     avg: 5142     median: 5157 (5%)     max: 5210 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 → 112% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 28. 22:44:33

#0 checking url part for id 525 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 405 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 May 2022 13:12:34 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 525 +0s ... 0.008s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#48 got single benchmarks 525 +0.006s ... 0.014s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 405 +0s ... 0.015s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.015s

#51 got single benchmarks 405 +0.018s ... 0.033s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.034s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.038s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.039s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#100 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.041s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#102 return log +0.004s ... 0.045s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)