, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Der P7550 ist baugleich zum Core 2 Duo P8400 und P7570, bietet jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen (VT-x) und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. Die Architektur des OEM Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 ausreichen. Im Vergleich zu AMD sollte die Performance auf Niveau der schnellsten Turion II Ultra mit 2.4 - 2.6 GHz liegen. Anspruchsvolle Spielefans sollten jedoch eher zu höher getakteten Core 2 Duo CPUs greifen (>2.5 GHz).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400

► remove from comparison Intel SL9400

Der Core 2 Duo SL9400 ist ein stromsparender Low Voltage Prozessor für dünne und leichte Notebooks. Er bietet den vollen 6MB Level 2 Cache des Penryn Kerns und bietet dadurch eine bessere Performance als andere 1.86 GHz Core 2 Duo Prozessoren mit weniger Cache (1-3MB üblich). Im Vergleich zum SL9380 bietet der SL9400 einen schnelleren FSB mit 1066 MHz.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2260 MHz1860 MHz
FSB10661066
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt17 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm1.050V - 1.150V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478BGA956
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, ExBitEnhanced Speedstep, Intel VT, TXT
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400
$284 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 SL9400 +
1.1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2439 Points (22%)
min: 2029     avg: 2126     median: 2144 (19%)     max: 2205 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4645 Points (6%)
min: 3831     avg: 3848     median: 3850 (5%)     max: 3864 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1112 s (13%)
min: 1329.49     avg: 1355     median: 1354.7 (16%)     max: 1379.9 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
35.6 s (7%)
min: 41.932     avg: 43.1     median: 43.1 (9%)     max: 44.3 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2004 Points (4%)
min: 909     avg: 1300     median: 1300 (3%)     max: 1691 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.7 s (5%)
min: 23     avg: 23.8     median: 23 (5%)     max: 25.4 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
53.6 s (2%)
min: 53     avg: 56.6     median: 58 (2%)     max: 58.9 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1278 s (6%)
min: 1372     avg: 1428     median: 1433 (6%)     max: 1480 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
17680 MIPS (8%)
min: 17246     avg: 17255     median: 17255 (8%)     max: 17264 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
16630 MFLOPS (13%)
min: 13673     avg: 13693     median: 13692.5 (11%)     max: 13712 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4946 Points (31%)
min: 3921     avg: 4158     median: 4158 (26%)     max: 4395 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 SL9400 +
4.8 Points (69%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 SL9400 +
5.3 Points (68%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 SL9400 +
3809 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 → 90% n=11

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 19. 05:43:56

#0 checking url part for id 525 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 422 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 18 Jan 2022 12:10:47 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.011s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.011s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 525 +0s ... 0.012s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#48 got single benchmarks 525 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 422 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#51 got single benchmarks 422 +0.01s ... 0.029s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.03s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.036s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.037s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.038s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.04s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#91 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.04s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#93 return log +0.004s ... 0.044s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)