Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T8100

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Der P7550 ist baugleich zum Core 2 Duo P8400 und P7570, bietet jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen (VT-x) und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. Die Architektur des OEM Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 ausreichen. Im Vergleich zu AMD sollte die Performance auf Niveau der schnellsten Turion II Ultra mit 2.4 - 2.6 GHz liegen. Anspruchsvolle Spielefans sollten jedoch eher zu höher getakteten Core 2 Duo CPUs greifen (>2.5 GHz).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo T8100

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 ist ein Mittelklasse Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks in 2008. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern und bietet alle Funktionen des Kerns (wie VT-x Virtualisierungsfunktionen). 

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo T8100
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2260 MHz2100 MHz
FSB1066800
L2 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm1.000V-1.250V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478BGA479, PGA478
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, ExBitVirtualization VT-x, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit, Idle States
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo T8100
$209 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2439 Points (22%)
min: 2217     avg: 2310     median: 2320 (21%)     max: 2357 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4645 Points (6%)
min: 4102     avg: 4251     median: 4282 (6%)     max: 4332 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P7550 +
1112 s (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
35.6 s (7%)
37.5 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2004 Points (4%)
min: 1764     avg: 1851     median: 1878 (4%)     max: 1909 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.7 s (5%)
min: 23     avg: 23.4     median: 23.1 (5%)     max: 24.23 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
53.6 s (2%)
min: 54.6     avg: 55.2     median: 55 (2%)     max: 56 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1278 s (6%)
1347 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
17680 MIPS (8%)
19291 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
16630 MFLOPS (13%)
15392 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4946 Points (31%)
min: 3250     avg: 4504     median: 4605 (29%)     max: 5677 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T8100 +
min: 4     avg: 4.8     median: 5 (71%)     max: 5.1 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T8100 +
4046 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 → 97% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 13. 03:04:42

#0 checking url part for id 525 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 380 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 525 +0s ... 0.007s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#48 got single benchmarks 525 +0.007s ... 0.014s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 380 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.015s

#51 got single benchmarks 380 +0.024s ... 0.039s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.04s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.042s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.045s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#111 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.048s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#113 return log +0.004s ... 0.053s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)