Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo P8400

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Der P7550 ist baugleich zum Core 2 Duo P8400 und P7570, bietet jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen (VT-x) und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. Die Architektur des OEM Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 ausreichen. Im Vergleich zu AMD sollte die Performance auf Niveau der schnellsten Turion II Ultra mit 2.4 - 2.6 GHz liegen. Anspruchsvolle Spielefans sollten jedoch eher zu höher getakteten Core 2 Duo CPUs greifen (>2.5 GHz).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

► remove from comparison Intel T9600

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 Dual-Core CPU ist ein High-End Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zum schnelleren T9900 unterstützt er jedoch noch nicht den C1E State. Der neuere Core 2 Duo P9700 bietet die selben Leistungsdaten, jedoch bei deutlich geringerem Stromverbrauch (28 W versus 35 Watt TDP).

Dank der relativ hohen Taktung von 2.8 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen geschlagen (da Spiele aus 2009 meist nicht mehr als 2 Kerne auslasten).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo P8400

► remove from comparison Intel P8400

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Im Vergleich zu den stärkeren Modellen bietet, der P8400 zwar nur die Hälfte an Level 2 Cache, jedoch bleibt dadurch der Stromverbrauch mit maximal 25 Watt auch geringer. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Der P8400 ist sehr ähnlich zu der OEM Version Core 2 Duo P7550, welcher später auf den Markt kam.

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 ausreichen. Im Vergleich zu AMD sollte die Performance auf Niveau der schnellsten Turion II Ultra mit 2.4 - 2.6 GHz liegen. Anspruchsvolle Spielefans sollten jedoch eher zu höher getakteten Core 2 Duo CPUs greifen (>2.5 GHz).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo P8400 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo T9600Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2260 MHz2800 MHz2260 MHz
FSB106610661066
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt25 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm1.05-1.2125 V45 nm1.05-1.15
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)Socket P
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, ExBitSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo T9600Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
$316 U.S.$209 U.S.
L1 Cache128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2439 Points (22%)
min: 3060     avg: 3204     median: 3106.5 (28%)     max: 3541 Points
min: 2418     avg: 2527     median: 2497 (22%)     max: 2882 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4645 Points (6%)
min: 5538     avg: 5936     median: 5801 (8%)     max: 6785 Points
min: 4507     avg: 4701     median: 4630 (6%)     max: 5314 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P7550 +
1112 s (13%)
103%
1 T9600 +
min: 877     avg: 900     median: 899.5 (11%)     max: 922 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
35.6 s (7%)
min: 27     avg: 28.1     median: 27.7 (6%)     max: 29.7 s
34.2 s (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2004 Points (4%)
min: 2465     avg: 2524     median: 2517 (5%)     max: 2598 Points
min: 1922     avg: 2030     median: 2036 (4%)     max: 2084 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.7 s (5%)
min: 16     avg: 16.3     median: 16 (3%)     max: 16.98 s
min: 21.75     avg: 22.1     median: 22 (5%)     max: 22.71 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
53.6 s (2%)
min: 39     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (2%)     max: 40.98 s
min: 50.7     avg: 51.5     median: 51.8 (2%)     max: 52.2 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1278 s (6%)
min: 1033     avg: 1052     median: 1034 (5%)     max: 1088 s
1212 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
17680 MIPS (8%)
min: 25986     avg: 26074     median: 26073.5 (12%)     max: 26161 MIPS
21204 MIPS (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
16630 MFLOPS (13%)
min: 19701     avg: 20127     median: 20126.5 (15%)     max: 20552 MFLOPS
15993 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4946 Points (31%)
min: 5911     avg: 6761     median: 6798 (43%)     max: 7573 Points
min: 3410     avg: 5117     median: 5201.5 (33%)     max: 6255 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9600 +
5.6 Points (80%)
93%
1 P8400 +
5.2 Points (74%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T9600 +
min: 5700     avg: 5703     median: 5703 (6%)     max: 5706 Points
76%
1 P8400 +
min: 3518     avg: 4111     median: 4340 (4%)     max: 4475 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → 119% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 → 103% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 26. 18:42:44

#0 checking url part for id 525 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 398 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.011s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#81 composed specs +0s ... 0.011s

#82 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#83 getting avg benchmarks for device 525 +0s ... 0.012s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#85 got single benchmarks 525 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#86 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0s ... 0.018s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#88 got single benchmarks 397 +0.014s ... 0.033s

#89 getting avg benchmarks for device 398 +0s ... 0.033s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.034s

#91 got single benchmarks 398 +0.036s ... 0.07s

#92 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.07s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.071s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#124 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#125 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.073s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.074s

#133 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#136 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.075s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.075s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#139 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#141 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#143 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#144 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#146 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#147 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#148 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#149 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#150 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#151 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#153 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#154 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.076s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.076s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#157 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#159 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#160 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#161 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#162 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#163 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#164 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.077s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.077s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#167 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#169 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#170 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#171 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#172 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#173 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#174 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.078s

#175 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.078s

#176 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#177 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#178 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#179 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.079s

#180 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#181 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#182 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#183 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.08s

#184 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.081s

#185 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.081s

#186 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#187 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.082s

#188 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.082s

#189 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#190 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#191 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#192 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#193 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#194 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#195 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#196 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#197 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#198 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#199 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#200 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#201 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#202 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#203 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#204 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#205 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.083s

#206 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#207 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#208 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#209 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#210 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#211 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#212 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.084s

#213 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#214 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.085s

#215 return log +0s ... 0.085s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)