Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9500

Intel Core 2 Duo P7550

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Der P7550 ist baugleich zum Core 2 Duo P8400 und P7570, bietet jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen (VT-x) und keine Unterstützung für Trusted Execution Technology. Die Architektur des OEM Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 ausreichen. Im Vergleich zu AMD sollte die Performance auf Niveau der schnellsten Turion II Ultra mit 2.4 - 2.6 GHz liegen. Anspruchsvolle Spielefans sollten jedoch eher zu höher getakteten Core 2 Duo CPUs greifen (>2.5 GHz).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

► remove from comparison Intel T9600

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 Dual-Core CPU ist ein High-End Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zum schnelleren T9900 unterstützt er jedoch noch nicht den C1E State. Der neuere Core 2 Duo P9700 bietet die selben Leistungsdaten, jedoch bei deutlich geringerem Stromverbrauch (28 W versus 35 Watt TDP).

Dank der relativ hohen Taktung von 2.8 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen geschlagen (da Spiele aus 2009 meist nicht mehr als 2 Kerne auslasten).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo T9500

► remove from comparison Intel T9500

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 Dual-Core CPU ist ein oberer Mittelklasse Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zum neueren Core 2 Duo T9550, bietet der T9500 etwas weniger Kerntakt und einen Front-Side-Bus von nur 800MHz.

Dank der 2.6 GHz und des großen Level 2 Cache von 6 MB (shared für alle beiden Kerne), ist die Anwendungsleistung für Single-Threaded Anwendungen und Spiele welche hauptsächlich einen Kern benutzen, sehr gut. Moderne Spiele, welche mehrere Threads benutzen, können jedoch von einem 4-Kerner deutlich mehr profitieren (z.B. ein Drittel mehr Leistung bei DIRT 2 beim Einsatz von 4 Kernen, siehe unseren Prozessorleistung und Spiele Artikel). In 2009 reichte die Performance des T9500 jedoch für eine flüssige Darstellung von allen Spielen (GTA4 ev. knapp) und auch anspruchsvolle Anwendungen kommen mit der Leistung gut aus.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Im Core 2 Duo T9500 wurden keine Features der Penryn Architektur deaktiviert. Daher unterstützt er 64 Bit, Virtualisierung und alle Stromsparfunktionen (z.B. C6 State). Der neuere T9550 unterstützt jedoch bereits Trusted Execution Technology laut Intel.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo T9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2260 MHz2800 MHz2600 MHz
FSB10661066800
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million410 Million
45 nm45 nm1.05-1.2125 V45 nm1.0-1.25V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)BGA479, PGA478, PPGA478
FeaturesEnhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, ExBitVirtualization Technolgoy (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P7550Intel Core 2 Duo T9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
$316 U.S.$530 U.S.
L1 Cache128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2439 Points (22%)
min: 3060     avg: 3204     median: 3106.5 (28%)     max: 3541 Points
min: 2659     avg: 2927     median: 2950 (26%)     max: 3208 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4645 Points (6%)
min: 5538     avg: 5936     median: 5801 (8%)     max: 6785 Points
min: 5094     avg: 5441     median: 5419 (7%)     max: 5885 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P7550 +
1112 s (13%)
103%
1 T9600 +
min: 877     avg: 900     median: 899.5 (11%)     max: 922 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 P7550 +
35.6 s (7%)
102%
1 T9600 +
min: 27     avg: 28.1     median: 27.7 (6%)     max: 29.7 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2004 Points (4%)
min: 2465     avg: 2524     median: 2517 (5%)     max: 2598 Points
min: 2273     avg: 2374     median: 2352 (5%)     max: 2598 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
22.7 s (5%)
min: 16     avg: 16.3     median: 16 (3%)     max: 16.98 s
min: 17     avg: 17.5     median: 17.5 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
53.6 s (2%)
min: 39     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (2%)     max: 40.98 s
min: 42     avg: 43.5     median: 43.5 (2%)     max: 45 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1278 s (6%)
min: 1033     avg: 1052     median: 1034 (5%)     max: 1088 s
min: 1126     avg: 1196     median: 1195.5 (5%)     max: 1265 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
17680 MIPS (8%)
min: 25986     avg: 26074     median: 26073.5 (12%)     max: 26161 MIPS
23933 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
16630 MFLOPS (13%)
min: 19701     avg: 20127     median: 20126.5 (15%)     max: 20552 MFLOPS
19062 MFLOPS (15%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4946 Points (31%)
min: 5911     avg: 6761     median: 6798 (43%)     max: 7573 Points
min: 5765     avg: 6306     median: 6334 (40%)     max: 6668 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9600 +
5.6 Points (80%)
98%
1 T9500 +
5.5 Points (79%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T9600 +
min: 5700     avg: 5703     median: 5703 (6%)     max: 5706 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → 121% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 → 115% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 30. 09:51:39

#0 checking url part for id 525 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 376 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.011s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#81 composed specs +0s ... 0.011s

#82 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#83 getting avg benchmarks for device 525 +0s ... 0.012s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#85 got single benchmarks 525 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#86 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0s ... 0.018s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#88 got single benchmarks 397 +0.015s ... 0.034s

#89 getting avg benchmarks for device 376 +0s ... 0.034s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#91 got single benchmarks 376 +0.012s ... 0.046s

#92 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.047s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.047s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#121 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#137 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#142 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#149 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#152 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.056s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#158 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#162 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#163 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#166 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#169 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#170 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#171 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#172 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.057s

#173 return log +0s ... 0.057s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)