Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

Intel Core 2 Duo P8400

► remove from comparison Intel P8400

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Im Vergleich zu den stärkeren Modellen bietet, der P8400 zwar nur die Hälfte an Level 2 Cache, jedoch bleibt dadurch der Stromverbrauch mit maximal 25 Watt auch geringer. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Der P8400 ist sehr ähnlich zu der OEM Version Core 2 Duo P7550, welcher später auf den Markt kam.

Für Multimediaanwendungen und anspruchslose Spiele, sollte die Performance des Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 ausreichen. Im Vergleich zu AMD sollte die Performance auf Niveau der schnellsten Turion II Ultra mit 2.4 - 2.6 GHz liegen. Anspruchsvolle Spielefans sollten jedoch eher zu höher getakteten Core 2 Duo CPUs greifen (>2.5 GHz).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo P8400 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

► remove from comparison Intel T9600

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 Dual-Core CPU ist ein High-End Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zum schnelleren T9900 unterstützt er jedoch noch nicht den C1E State. Der neuere Core 2 Duo P9700 bietet die selben Leistungsdaten, jedoch bei deutlich geringerem Stromverbrauch (28 W versus 35 Watt TDP).

Dank der relativ hohen Taktung von 2.8 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen geschlagen (da Spiele aus 2009 meist nicht mehr als 2 Kerne auslasten).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P8400Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2260 MHz2800 MHz
FSB10661066
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache3 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1.05-1.1545 nm1.05-1.2125 V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketSocket PSocket P (BGA479, PGA478)
FeaturesSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
Architecturex86x86
$209 U.S.$316 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P8400Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2418     avg: 2527     median: 2497 (22%)     max: 2882 Points
min: 3060     avg: 3204     median: 3106.5 (28%)     max: 3541 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4507     avg: 4701     median: 4630 (6%)     max: 5314 Points
min: 5538     avg: 5936     median: 5801 (8%)     max: 6785 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
34.2 s (7%)
min: 27     avg: 28.1     median: 27.7 (6%)     max: 29.7 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T9600 +
min: 877     avg: 900     median: 899.5 (11%)     max: 922 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1922     avg: 2030     median: 2036 (4%)     max: 2084 Points
min: 2465     avg: 2524     median: 2517 (5%)     max: 2598 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 21.75     avg: 22.1     median: 22 (5%)     max: 22.71 s
min: 16     avg: 16.3     median: 16 (3%)     max: 16.98 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 50.7     avg: 51.5     median: 51.8 (2%)     max: 52.2 s
min: 39     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (2%)     max: 40.98 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1212 s (5%)
min: 1033     avg: 1052     median: 1034 (5%)     max: 1088 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
21204 MIPS (10%)
min: 25986     avg: 26074     median: 26073.5 (12%)     max: 26161 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
15993 MFLOPS (12%)
min: 19701     avg: 20127     median: 20126.5 (15%)     max: 20552 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3410     avg: 5117     median: 5201.5 (33%)     max: 6255 Points
min: 5911     avg: 6761     median: 6798 (43%)     max: 7573 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.2 Points (74%)
5.6 Points (80%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 3518     avg: 4111     median: 4340 (4%)     max: 4475 Points
min: 5700     avg: 5703     median: 5703 (6%)     max: 5706 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → 116% n=12

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 27. 07:09:33

#0 checking url part for id 398 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 398 +0s ... 0.01s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.01s

#48 got single benchmarks 398 +0.039s ... 0.049s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0s ... 0.05s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#51 got single benchmarks 397 +0.013s ... 0.064s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#121 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#122 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#123 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#124 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#125 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#127 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#129 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.069s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#133 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#135 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#136 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#137 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#139 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#140 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#142 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#143 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#144 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#147 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#148 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#149 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#150 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#152 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#155 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#157 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.071s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#159 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#160 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#161 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#162 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#163 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.072s

#164 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.072s

#165 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#166 return log +0.003s ... 0.076s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)