Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6500

Intel Core 2 Duo P8700

► remove from comparison Intel P8700

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Im Vergleich zu stärkeren Modellen (ausser dem nur höher getakteten P8800), bietet der P8700 zwar nur die Hälfte an Level 2 Cache, jedoch bleibt dadurch der Stromverbrauch mit maximal 25 Watt auch geringer. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. 

Dank der relativ hohen Taktung von 2.53 GHz, ist die Performance jedoch für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert von einem schnelleren Prozessor).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Intel Core 2 Duo T6500

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 ist ein Einstiegsprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den Penryn Kern, bietet jedoch nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache und ist mit 2.1 GHz relativ langsam getaktet. Im Vergleich zum vergleichbaren T6570, bietet der T6500 jedoch keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen VT-x.

Durch die mittelmäßige Taktfrequenz und den kleinen Level 2 Cache, kann die CPU bei modernen und anspruchsvollen Spielen durchaus limitieren (z.B. große Multiplayerschlachten bei Supreme Commander). Für die mittelmäßig anspruchsvolle (nicht professionelle) Anwendungen wie Office, Entry-Level Videoschnitt, Bildbearbeitung, Internet und casual Gaming sollte die Leistung jedoch ausreichen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P8700Intel Core 2 Duo T6500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2530 MHz2100 MHz
FSB1066800
L2 Cache3 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm, 1.00V - 1.25V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478PGA478
FeaturesSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
Architecturex86x86
$209 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P8700Intel Core 2 Duo T6500

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2516     avg: 2826     median: 2805 (25%)     max: 3057 Points
min: 2197     avg: 2283     median: 2249 (20%)     max: 2487 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4741     avg: 5273     median: 5169 (7%)     max: 5882 Points
min: 3800     avg: 4254     median: 4262 (6%)     max: 4757 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 975     avg: 1020     median: 1038 (12%)     max: 1048 s
min: 1158     avg: 1172     median: 1171.5 (14%)     max: 1185 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 30.3     avg: 31.6     median: 31.6 (6%)     max: 32.9 s
min: 36.5     avg: 36.9     median: 37.1 (7%)     max: 37.24 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2085     avg: 2231     median: 2253.5 (5%)     max: 2285 Points
min: 1768     avg: 1856     median: 1879 (4%)     max: 1887 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 19.75     avg: 22.7     median: 20.5 (4%)     max: 30 s
min: 22     avg: 24.2     median: 24.5 (5%)     max: 25.58 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 46.46     avg: 54     median: 50.4 (2%)     max: 69 s
min: 54     avg: 58.3     median: 58.5 (3%)     max: 62.3 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1188     avg: 1227     median: 1227 (5%)     max: 1266 s
min: 1339     avg: 1348     median: 1341 (6%)     max: 1363 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 19740     avg: 21536     median: 21536 (10%)     max: 23332 MIPS
19458 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 17580     avg: 18070     median: 18070 (14%)     max: 18560 MFLOPS
15381 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4987     avg: 5478     median: 5364 (34%)     max: 6196 Points
min: 4087     avg: 4922     median: 5278 (33%)     max: 5522 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.4 Points (77%)
min: 5     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (73%)     max: 5.1 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 P8700 +
6.1 Points (78%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 4831     avg: 4872     median: 4872 (5%)     max: 4913 Points
min: 3945     avg: 4015     median: 4014.5 (4%)     max: 4084 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 → 92% n=13

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 29. 00:37:38

#0 checking url part for id 451 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 453 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 25 Sep 2022 13:14:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.008s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 451 +0s ... 0.011s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.011s

#48 got single benchmarks 451 +0.026s ... 0.037s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 453 +0s ... 0.037s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.038s

#51 got single benchmarks 453 +0.023s ... 0.061s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.066s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.066s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.067s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.067s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.068s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.068s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.069s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#127 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#132 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#134 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.07s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.07s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.071s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.072s

#146 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.072s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#148 return log +0.004s ... 0.076s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)