Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD Phenom II X4 P940 vs AMD Phenom II X4 N970

AMD Phenom II X4 P940

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Phenom II X4 P940 ist ein mit lediglich 1.7 GHz getakteter 4-Kern Prozessor für Notebooks. Er bietet keinen Level 3 Cache (im Gegensatz zum Desktop Phenom II) und dadurch ist die Performance besonders bei Single-Thread Anwendungen nicht sehr schnell. Die Leistung liegt je nach Auslastung der 4 Kerne zwischen einem 1.4 - 1.7 GHz Core 2 Duo (Einzelkern) bis zu einem Core i3-330M (alle Kerne in Verwendung).

Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt maximal DDR3-1066. Gefertigt wird die CPU im 45nm SOI Prozess. 

AMD Phenom II X4 N970

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Phenom II X4 N970 ist ein mobiler Quad-Core Prozessor für Notebooks und wahrscheinlich verwandt zum Desktop Athlon II X4 da ohne Level 3 Cache. Die CPU bietet 512 KB Level 2 Cache pro Kern und eine 128 Bit FPU. Der mobile Prozessor bietet ausserdem einen integrierter DDR3 Speicherkontroller und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Durch den fehlenden Level 3 Cache, ist die Performance nur mit einem Core 2 Quad Q9000 vergleichbar und somit nur auf dem Niveau eines Core i3-330M - 350M.

ModelAMD Phenom II X4 P940AMD Phenom II X4 N970
SeriesAMD Phenom II X4AMD Phenom II X4
CodenameChamplainChamplain
Serie: Phenom II X4 Champlain
AMD Phenom II X4 X940 BE compare2.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE compare2.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 N9702.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 N950 compare2.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 N930 compare2 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 P960 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4
» AMD Phenom II X4 P9401.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 P920 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 X940 BE compare2.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE compare2.3 GHz4 / 4
» AMD Phenom II X4 N9702.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 N950 compare2.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 N930 compare2 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 P960 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 P9401.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 P920 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4
Clock1700 MHz2200 MHz
FSB36003600
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP25 Watt35 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm
SocketS1 (S1g4)S1
FeaturesMMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, integrated DDR3-1066 memory controller, HyperTransport 3.0
Architecturex86x86
Announced

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N970 +
2.5 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N970 +
1861 Points (17%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N970 +
min: 6795     avg: 6811     median: 6810.5 (9%)     max: 6826 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N970 +
8347 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N970 +
2327 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N970 +
min: 543     avg: 549     median: 548.5 (6%)     max: 554 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N970 +
17.8 s (4%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N970 +
min: 3039     avg: 3043     median: 3042.5 (6%)     max: 3046 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N970 +
min: 34.7     avg: 35     median: 35 (8%)     max: 35.3 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N970 +
min: 79.6     avg: 80.3     median: 80.3 (3%)     max: 80.9 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N970 +
1883 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N970 +
32130 MIPS (15%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N970 +
25330 MFLOPS (19%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 N970 +
6.9 Points (88%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N970 +
7282 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N970 +
1940 Points (7%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Phenom II X4 N970 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 23. 17:25:15

#0 checking url part for id 1296 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1551 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 23 May 2022 13:12:29 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 1296 +0s ... 0.005s

#17 got single benchmarks 1296 +0s ... 0.005s

#18 getting avg benchmarks for device 1551 +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 got single benchmarks 1551 +0.007s ... 0.013s

#21 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.013s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.014s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.015s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.016s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.016s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.016s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.016s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.016s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.017s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.017s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.018s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.018s

#44 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.019s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#46 return log +0.004s ... 0.023s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)