, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9300

Intel Core 2 Duo P9500

► remove from comparison Intel P9500

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 ist ein sparsamer Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der oberen Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der Prozessor wurde später vom 2.63 GHz schnellen P9600 zum selben Startpreis abgelöst, welcher ebenfalls nur 25 Watt braucht. 

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo P9500 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.53 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo T9400 und dadurch sollte sie für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Intel Core 2 Duo T9300

► remove from comparison Intel T9300

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks der Mittelklasse. Er gehört zur Penryn Serie und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Der T9400 ist zwar ähnlich getaktet bietet jedoch einen höher getakteten FSB.

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo T9300 sollte für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen oder höherem Takt). Der alte Core 2 Quad Q9000 wird auch bei den meisten Anwendungen geschlagen, da er mit nur 2.0 GHz getaktet wird.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Intel Core 2 Duo P9500Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
Intel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
PenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
2530 MHz2500 MHz
1066800
128 KB128 KB
6 MB6 MB
2 / 22 / 2
25 35
410 410
45 45 1-1.25V
107 mm2107 mm2
105 °C105 °C
BGA479, PGA478BGA479, PGA478
Virtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$348 U.S.$316 U.S.
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500Intel Core 2 Duo T9300

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2758     avg: 2944     median: 2901 (26%)     max: 3234
min: 2719     avg: 2823     median: 2799 (25%)     max: 3009
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5245     avg: 5607     median: 5501.5 (9%)     max: 6104
min: 4968     avg: 5230     median: 5189.5 (8%)     max: 5854
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
30.5 s (6%)
31.6 s (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1687     avg: 2198     median: 2311 (13%)     max: 2350 Points
min: 2109     avg: 2249     median: 2257.5 (12%)     max: 2336 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 17.675     avg: 18     median: 18 (4%)     max: 18.314 s
min: 17     avg: 17.6     median: 17.9 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 42.495     avg: 43.2     median: 43.2 (2%)     max: 43.914 s
min: 43     avg: 43.4     median: 43.1 (2%)     max: 44 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1101 s (5%)
1173 s (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
23667 MIPS (11%)
23021 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
17820 MFLOPS (14%)
18370 MFLOPS (14%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4598     avg: 6203     median: 6250 (39%)     max: 7387 Points
min: 4423     avg: 5707     median: 5899 (37%)     max: 6890 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.4 Points (77%)
min: 4.8     avg: 5.3     median: 5.4 (77%)     max: 5.4 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 5060     avg: 5142     median: 5157 (6%)     max: 5210 Points
min: 4554     avg: 4735     median: 4735 (5%)     max: 4916 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 → 98% n=12

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.17
log 16. 23:34:16

#0 checking url part for id 405 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 377 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 15 Oct 2021 13:09:32 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 405 +0s ... 0.006s

#7 got single benchmarks 405 +0.018s ... 0.024s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 377 +0s ... 0.025s

#9 got single benchmarks 377 +0.026s ... 0.051s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.059s

#12 return log +0.003s ... 0.063s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)