Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD Phenom II X4 P960 vs AMD Phenom II X4 P920

AMD Phenom II X4 P960

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Phenom II X4 P960 ist ein mit lediglich 1.8 GHz getakteter 4-Kern Prozessor für Notebooks. Er bietet keinen Level 3 Cache (im Gegensatz zum Desktop Phenom II) und dadurch ist die Performance besonders bei Single-Thread Anwendungen nicht sehr schnell. Die Leistung liegt je nach Auslastung der 4 Kerne zwischen einem 1.5 - 1.8 GHz Core 2 Duo (Einzelkern) bis zu einem Core i3-330M (alle Kerne in Verwendung).

Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt maximal DDR3-1066. Gefertigt wird die CPU im 45nm SOI Prozess. 

AMD Phenom II X4 P920

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Phenom II X4 P920 ist ein mit lediglich 1.6 GHz getakteter 4-Kern Prozessor für Notebooks. Er bietet keinen Level 3 Cache (im Gegensatz zum Desktop Phenom II) und dadurch ist die Performance besonders bei Single-Thread Anwendungen nicht sehr schnell.

Beim Cinebench R10 erreicht er dadurch nur die Performance eines 1.6 GHz Pentium Doppelkernprozessors. Im SuperPi sogar nur eines 1.3 GHz Core 2 Duo. Wenn alle 4 Kerne genutzt werden, kann die Leistung mit einem 2.3 GHz T4500 verglichen werden. Dadurch bleibt die Leistung fast immer unter einem Core i3-330M. Der Intel Core i7-720QM taktet zwar mit ebenfalls 1.6 GHz Basistaktfrequenz, bietet jedoch dank Turbo und Level 3 Cache eine deutlich bessere Performance. Der Stromverbrauch ist jedoch ebenfalls deutlich höher.

Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt maximal DDR3-1066. Gefertigt wird die CPU im 45nm SOI Prozess. 

ModelAMD Phenom II X4 P960AMD Phenom II X4 P920
SeriesAMD Phenom II X4AMD Phenom II X4
CodenameChamplainChamplain
Serie: Phenom II X4 Champlain
AMD Phenom II X4 X940 BE compare2.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE compare2.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 N970 compare2.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 N950 compare2.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 N930 compare2 GHz4 / 4
» AMD Phenom II X4 P9601.8 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 P940 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 P9201.6 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 X940 BE compare2.4 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 X920 BE compare2.3 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 N970 compare2.2 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 N950 compare2.1 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 N930 compare2 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 P9601.8 GHz4 / 4
AMD Phenom II X4 P940 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4
» AMD Phenom II X4 P9201.6 GHz4 / 4
Clock1800 MHz1600 MHz
FSB36003600
L1 Cache512 KB512 KB
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
TDP25 Watt25 Watt
Technology45 nm45 nm
SocketS1 (S1g4)S1 (S1g4)
FeaturesMMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, integrated DDR3-1066 memory controller, HyperTransport 3.0MMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, integrated DDR3-1066 memory controller, HyperTransport 3.0
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Phenom II X4 P920

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
P960 +
min: 2     avg: 2     median: 2 (4%)     max: 2.05 Points
min: 1.78     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (3%)     max: 1.83 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
P960 +
1542 Points (14%)
min: 1371     avg: 1604     median: 1395 (12%)     max: 2047 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
P960 +
5354 Points (7%)
min: 3965     avg: 4700     median: 5042 (7%)     max: 5094 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
P960 +
6649 Points (6%)
min: 6065     avg: 6089     median: 6089 (5%)     max: 6113 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
P960 +
1922 Points (12%)
min: 1734     avg: 1743     median: 1743 (11%)     max: 1752 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
P960 +
705 s (8%)
min: 767     avg: 768     median: 767.5 (9%)     max: 768 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
P960 +
24 s (5%)
100%
P920 +
24 s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
P960 +
2519 Points (5%)
min: 1863     avg: 2083     median: 2082.5 (4%)     max: 2302 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
P960 +
45 s (10%)
100%
P920 +
min: 46     avg: 46.6     median: 46.8 (10%)     max: 47 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
P960 +
102 s (4%)
101%
P920 +
min: 46     avg: 76.8     median: 77.3 (3%)     max: 107 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
P960 +
2360 s (10%)
min: 2476     avg: 2488     median: 2488 (11%)     max: 2500 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
P960 +
27374 MIPS (13%)
min: 16680     avg: 20480     median: 20480 (10%)     max: 24280 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
P960 +
21381 MFLOPS (16%)
min: 13310     avg: 15720     median: 15720 (12%)     max: 18130 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 P920 +
5398 Points (34%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
P960 +
6.6 Points (85%)
6.2 Points (79%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
P960 +
5971 Points (6%)
min: 5353     avg: 5384     median: 5383.5 (5%)     max: 5414 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 P960 +
1542 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Phenom II X4 P960 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks AMD Phenom II X4 P920 → 91% n=15

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 14:06:26

#0 checking url part for id 1348 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 888 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 23 May 2022 13:12:29 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.003s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#15 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#16 getting avg benchmarks for device 1348 +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 got single benchmarks 1348 +0.01s ... 0.016s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 888 +0s ... 0.016s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#21 got single benchmarks 888 +0.012s ... 0.028s

#22 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.03s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.036s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.038s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#72 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.039s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.031s ... 0.071s

#74 return log +0.003s ... 0.074s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)