, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9800

Intel Core 2 Duo P9700

► remove from comparison Intel P9700

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 ist ein schneller und trotzdem sparsamer Doppelkernprozessor der Penryn Reihe für Notebooks. Die CPU ist die schnellste Variante der Core 2 Duo P-Serie, braucht jedoch mit 28 Watt etwas mehr Strom als die kleineren P-Modelle. Im Vergleich zur T-Serie (welche mit 35 Watt spezifiziert ist), ist der P9700 jedoch sparsam.

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo P9700 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.8 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo T9600 und dadurch sollte sie für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung des P9700 bei den meisten Spielen geschlagen (da Spiele aus 2009 meist nicht mehr als 2 Kerne auslasten).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. 

Intel Core 2 Duo T9800

► remove from comparison Intel T9800

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 ist ein schneller high-end Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Zur Zeit der Einführung war er der schnellste Core 2 Duo für Notebooks, später wurde er jedoch vom T9900 abgelöst (mit 3.06 GHz).

Dank der hohen Taktung von 2.93 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen deutlich geschlagen. Nur Anwendungen welche mehr als 2 parallele Threads effizient nutzen können (z.B. 3D Rendering) sind auf Quad-Core Prozessoren schneller. In der Einzelthreadperformance können erst die aktuellen Core i7 Modelle und die schnelleren Dual Core CPUs mit 3 GHz (T9900), den T9800 abhängen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9800 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P9700Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2800 MHz2920 MHz
FSB10661066
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP28 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm1.012-1.175V45 nm1-1.25 V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$348 U.S.$530 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P9700Intel Core 2 Duo T9800

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3060     avg: 3330     median: 3425 (31%)     max: 3506 Points
3633 Points (32%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5680     avg: 6143     median: 6133 (8%)     max: 6616 Points
6839 Points (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P9700 +
1737 s (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 P9700 +
54.6 s (11%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2506     avg: 2552     median: 2540 (5%)     max: 2610 Points
2626 Points (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
16 s (3%)
15 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
39 s (2%)
38 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1030 s (5%)
1008 s (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
25753 MIPS (12%)
26991 MIPS (13%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
19374 MFLOPS (15%)
20305 MFLOPS (16%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
7348 Points (46%)
6618 Points (42%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9800 +
5.7 Points (81%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
5396 Points (6%)
5802 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 → 103% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 28. 09:52:33

#0 checking url part for id 476 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 448 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#44 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#45 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#46 getting avg benchmarks for device 476 +0s ... 0.01s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#48 got single benchmarks 476 +0.008s ... 0.019s

#49 getting avg benchmarks for device 448 +0s ... 0.019s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#51 got single benchmarks 448 +0.008s ... 0.027s

#52 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.028s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.033s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.034s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.034s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#80 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.036s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.025s ... 0.061s

#82 return log +0.004s ... 0.065s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)