Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9500

Intel Core 2 Duo P9700

► remove from comparison Intel P9700

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 ist ein schneller und trotzdem sparsamer Doppelkernprozessor der Penryn Reihe für Notebooks. Die CPU ist die schnellste Variante der Core 2 Duo P-Serie, braucht jedoch mit 28 Watt etwas mehr Strom als die kleineren P-Modelle. Im Vergleich zur T-Serie (welche mit 35 Watt spezifiziert ist), ist der P9700 jedoch sparsam.

Die Performance des Core 2 Duo P9700 ist vergleichbar mit dem ebenfalls mit 2.8 GHz getakteten Core 2 Duo T9600 und dadurch sollte sie für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichen (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung des P9700 bei den meisten Spielen geschlagen (da Spiele aus 2009 meist nicht mehr als 2 Kerne auslasten).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. 

Intel Core 2 Duo T9900

► remove from comparison Intel T9900

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 Dual-Core CPU löst praktisch den Core 2 Extreme X9100 (ebenfalls 3.06 GHz und 6MB L2 Cache) ab und hat zusätzlich noch einen deutlich geringeren Stromverbrauch (35 versus 44 Watt TDP dank verbessertem Stepping und Enhanced Halt State (C1E)). Einzig der freie Multiplikator unterscheidet den X9100 noch vom T9900 und bietet einen Vorteil (die einfache Übertaktbarkeit per Erhöhung des Multiplikators). Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Dank der hohen Taktung von 3 GHz, ist die Performance für die alle Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von mehr Prozessorkernen). Die alten Core 2 Quad Mobilprozessoren (Q9000, QX9300) werden dank der hohen Taktung bei den meisten Spielen deutlich geschlagen. Nur Anwendungen welche mehr als 2 parallele Threads effizient nutzen können (z.B. 3D Rendering) sind auf Quad-Core Prozessoren schneller. In der Einzelthreadperformance können erst die aktuellen Core i7 Modelle den T9900 deutlich abhängen.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo T9900 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo T9500

► remove from comparison Intel T9500

Die Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 Dual-Core CPU ist ein oberer Mittelklasse Dual-Core Prozessor für Notebooks. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt. Im Vergleich zum neueren Core 2 Duo T9550, bietet der T9500 etwas weniger Kerntakt und einen Front-Side-Bus von nur 800MHz.

Dank der 2.6 GHz und des großen Level 2 Cache von 6 MB (shared für alle beiden Kerne), ist die Anwendungsleistung für Single-Threaded Anwendungen und Spiele welche hauptsächlich einen Kern benutzen, sehr gut. Moderne Spiele, welche mehrere Threads benutzen, können jedoch von einem 4-Kerner deutlich mehr profitieren (z.B. ein Drittel mehr Leistung bei DIRT 2 beim Einsatz von 4 Kernen, siehe unseren Prozessorleistung und Spiele Artikel). In 2009 reichte die Performance des T9500 jedoch für eine flüssige Darstellung von allen Spielen (GTA4 ev. knapp) und auch anspruchsvolle Anwendungen kommen mit der Leistung gut aus.

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Im Core 2 Duo T9500 wurden keine Features der Penryn Architektur deaktiviert. Daher unterstützt er 64 Bit, Virtualisierung und alle Stromsparfunktionen (z.B. C6 State). Der neuere T9550 unterstützt jedoch bereits Trusted Execution Technology laut Intel.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 800 MHz.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P9700Intel Core 2 Duo T9900Intel Core 2 Duo T9500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2800 MHz3060 MHz2600 MHz
FSB10661066800
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP28 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million410 Million
45 nm1.012-1.175V45 nm1.05-1.2125 V45 nm1.0-1.25V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)BGA479, PGA478, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution TechnologyVirtualization Technolgoy (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
$348 U.S.$530 U.S.$530 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P9700Intel Core 2 Duo T9900Intel Core 2 Duo T9500

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3060     avg: 3330     median: 3425 (31%)     max: 3506 Points
min: 3353     avg: 3538     median: 3537.5 (32%)     max: 3722 Points
min: 2659     avg: 2927     median: 2950 (26%)     max: 3208 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5680     avg: 6143     median: 6133 (8%)     max: 6616 Points
min: 6318     avg: 6886     median: 7094 (10%)     max: 7247 Points
min: 5094     avg: 5441     median: 5419 (7%)     max: 5885 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P9700 +
1737 s (21%)
114%
1 T9900 +
799 s (9%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 P9700 +
54.6 s (11%)
107%
1 T9900 +
25.1 s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2506     avg: 2552     median: 2540 (5%)     max: 2610 Points
2787 Points (6%)
min: 2273     avg: 2374     median: 2352 (5%)     max: 2598 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
16 s (3%)
15.3 s (3%)
min: 17     avg: 17.5     median: 17.5 (4%)     max: 18 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
39 s (2%)
37.1 s (2%)
min: 42     avg: 43.5     median: 43.5 (2%)     max: 45 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1030 s (5%)
972 s (4%)
min: 1126     avg: 1196     median: 1195.5 (5%)     max: 1265 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
25753 MIPS (12%)
25083 MIPS (12%)
23933 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
19374 MFLOPS (15%)
20460 MFLOPS (16%)
19062 MFLOPS (15%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
7348 Points (46%)
8922 Points (56%)
min: 5765     avg: 6306     median: 6334 (40%)     max: 6668 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9900 +
5.7 Points (81%)
96%
1 T9500 +
5.5 Points (79%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 P9700 +
5396 Points (6%)
112%
1 T9900 +
6045 Points (6%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 → 106% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 → 94% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 22. 12:27:04

#0 checking url part for id 476 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 475 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 376 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.013s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#81 composed specs +0s ... 0.013s

#82 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#83 getting avg benchmarks for device 476 +0s ... 0.013s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.014s

#85 got single benchmarks 476 +0.008s ... 0.022s

#86 getting avg benchmarks for device 475 +0s ... 0.022s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#88 got single benchmarks 475 +0.007s ... 0.03s

#89 getting avg benchmarks for device 376 +0s ... 0.03s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#91 got single benchmarks 376 +0.012s ... 0.043s

#92 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.044s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#125 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#134 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#138 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.05s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#141 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#149 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#156 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#159 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.054s

#160 return log +0s ... 0.054s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)