Notebookcheck Logo

Marvell PXA986 vs HiSilicon Kirin 910T vs HiSilicon Kirin 910

Marvell PXA986

► remove from comparison Marvell Technology Group PXA986

Der Marvell PXA986 ist ein ARM basierter Dual-Core SoC für Smartphones und Tablets. Er bietet zwei Cortex-A9 Kerne mit meist 1.2 GHz Takt, eine Vivante GC1000 Grafikkarte, einen Video-Prozessor für 720p30 Wiedergabe von H.263, H.264 BP und MPEG4- SP und ein WCDMA+HSDPA Modem.

HiSilicon Kirin 910T

► remove from comparison

Der HiSilicon Kirin 910T ist ein ARM-basierter Quad-Core-SoC für (Android-)Smartphones und Tablets, der im ersten Halbjahr 2014 zusammen mit dem Huawei Ascend P7 vorgestellt wurde. Neben vier Cortex-A9-Kernen (max. 1,8 GHz) integriert der Chip auch eine Mali-450 MP4 Grafikeinheit, einen Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600-Speichercontroller sowie ein LTE Cat. 4 Modem.

Die CPU-Performance ordnet sich dank der hochtaktenden Cortex-A9-Kerne im oberen Mittelfeld ein, sodass der 910T in etwa mit einem Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 (1,7 - 1,9 GHz Krait) vergleichbar ist. Dies genügt, um Browsing und andere typische Android-Anwendungen zügig zu bewältigen.

Die mit 533 MHz taktende Mali-450 MP4 sorgt für eine ansprechende Grafikleistung auf dem Niveau der Qualcomm Adreno 320. Damit werden auch anspruchsvolle Android-Spiele in hoher Auflösung zumeist flüssig dargestellt.

Trotz Fertigung in einem aktuellen 28-Nanometer-Prozess (TSMC HPM) dürfte die Leistungsaufnahme des Kirin 910T durchschnittlich bis hoch ausfallen, was auf die vergleichsweise hohen Taktraten zurückzuführen ist. Demzufolge kann der SoC in mittelgroßen Smartphones, aber auch Tablets eingesetzt werden.

HiSilicon Kirin 910

► remove from comparison

Der HiSilicon Kirin 910 ist ein ARM-basierter Quad-Core-SoC für (Android-)Smartphones und Tablets, der Anfang 2014 zusammen mit dem Huawei Ascend P6S vorgestellt wurde. Neben vier Cortex-A9-Kernen (max. 1,6 GHz) integriert der Chip auch eine Mali-450 MP4 Grafikeinheit, einen Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600-Speichercontroller sowie ein LTE Cat. 4 Modem. Einziger Unterschied zum Kirin 910T ist damit der 200 MHz niedrigere CPU-Takt.

Die CPU-Performance ordnet sich dank der hochtaktenden Cortex-A9-Kerne im Mittelfeld ein, sodass der 910T in etwa mit einem Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro (1,5 - 1,7 GHz Krait) vergleichbar ist. Dies genügt, um Browsing und andere typische Android-Anwendungen zügig zu bewältigen.

Die mit 533 MHz taktende Mali-450 MP4 sorgt für eine ansprechende Grafikleistung knapp auf dem Niveau der Qualcomm Adreno 320. Damit werden auch anspruchsvolle Android-Spiele in hoher Auflösung zumeist flüssig dargestellt.

Trotz Fertigung in einem aktuellen 28-Nanometer-Prozess (TSMC HPM) dürfte die Leistungsaufnahme des Kirin 910 nur durchschnittlich ausfallen, was auf die vergleichsweise hohen Taktraten zurückzuführen ist. Demzufolge kann der SoC in mittelgroßen Smartphones, aber auch Tablets eingesetzt werden.

show full text
ModelMarvell PXA986HiSilicon Kirin 910THiSilicon Kirin 910
SeriesMarvell Technology Group
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A9Cortex-A9
Serie: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
» Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
» HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
» HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 Cortex-A9
Clock1200 MHz1800 MHz1600 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 44 / 4
Technology45 nm28 nm28 nm
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
ManufacturerMarvell Technology Group PXA986
FeaturesARMv7, Mali-450 MP4 (533 MHz), LTE (Cat. 4), Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (6.4 GB/s)ARMv7, Mali-450 MP4 (533 MHz), LTE (Cat. 4), Single-Channel LPDDR3-1600 (6.4 GB/s)

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 2623     avg: 2874     median: 2740 (2%)     max: 3258 Points
11572 Points (7%)
min: 9720     avg: 9785     median: 9784.5 (6%)     max: 9849 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 2709     avg: 2985     median: 2985 (2%)     max: 3261 Points
11485 Points (10%)
min: 9766     avg: 9884     median: 9883.5 (8%)     max: 10001 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
3675 Points (3%)
13330 Points (11%)
min: 8327     avg: 9920     median: 9920 (8%)     max: 11513 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 631     avg: 647     median: 646.5 (1%)     max: 662 Points
1796 Points (3%)
min: 1452     avg: 1548     median: 1547.5 (3%)     max: 1643 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 376     avg: 379.5     median: 379.5 (8%)     max: 383 Points
599 Points (12%)
min: 481     avg: 509     median: 509 (10%)     max: 537 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 437     avg: 439.5     median: 439.5 (4%)     max: 442 Points
622 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 1337     avg: 1448     median: 1448 (13%)     max: 1559 Points
1753 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 1275     avg: 1284     median: 1284 (3%)     max: 1293 Points
2784 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 709     avg: 720     median: 720 (1%)     max: 731 Points
1575 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 1005     avg: 1035     median: 1034.5 (3%)     max: 1064 Points
1938 Points (5%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 73.7     avg: 74.3     median: 74 (3%)     max: 75.3 MFLOPS
254 MFLOPS (9%)
202 MFLOPS (7%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 39.83     avg: 41.6     median: 41.4 (4%)     max: 43.69 MFLOPS
83.2 MFLOPS (8%)
62.8 MFLOPS (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 23941     avg: 25315     median: 25315 (30%)     max: 26689 ms
16135 ms (19%)
22419 ms (26%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1428     avg: 1608     median: 1624 (18%)     max: 1771 ms
1043 ms (11%)
min: 1277     avg: 1361     median: 1360.5 (15%)     max: 1444 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 1453     avg: 1531     median: 1530.5 (15%)     max: 1608 ms
1217 ms (12%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
1448 Points (1%)
2775 Points (3%)
min: 1467     avg: 1535     median: 1535 (2%)     max: 1603 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
874 Points (23%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
1200 Points (27%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1973 Points (26%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 3257     avg: 3515     median: 3514.5 (8%)     max: 3772 points
7189 points (17%)
5563 points (13%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 PXA986 +
2945 Points (19%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
min: 11051     avg: 11392     median: 11392 (26%)     max: 11733 Points
23864 Points (56%)
min: 21467     avg: 21865     median: 21864.5 (51%)     max: 22262 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 137     avg: 160     median: 159 (5%)     max: 184 Iter./s
584 Iter./s (18%)
537 Iter./s (17%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 4077     avg: 4208     median: 4266 (14%)     max: 4281 Iter./s
13307 Iter./s (44%)
11881 Iter./s (39%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
min: 3273     avg: 3820     median: 3976 (1%)     max: 4210 Points
12178 Points (2%)
11258 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
2019 Points (10%)

Average Benchmarks Marvell PXA986 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 910T → 264% n=15

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 910 → 221% n=15

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 06. 08:31:11

#0 checking url part for id 4461 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6191 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6344 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.049s ... 0.052s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#13 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.055s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#21 composed specs +0s ... 0.055s

#22 did output specs +0s ... 0.055s

#23 getting avg benchmarks for device 4461 +0s ... 0.055s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.057s

#26 got single benchmarks 4461 +0.007s ... 0.064s

#27 getting avg benchmarks for device 6191 +0s ... 0.065s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#29 got single benchmarks 6191 +0.006s ... 0.071s

#30 getting avg benchmarks for device 6344 +0s ... 0.071s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.071s

#32 got single benchmarks 6344 +0.006s ... 0.077s

#33 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.079s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.079s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.08s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.081s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.082s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.084s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.085s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.086s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.088s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.089s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.09s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.09s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.091s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.091s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.092s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.092s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.093s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.094s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.094s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.095s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.096s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.096s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#124 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.097s

#125 return log +0s ... 0.097s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)