Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD Athlon X2 QL-66 vs AMD Athlon X2 QL-62 vs AMD Athlon X2 QL-64

AMD Athlon X2 QL-66

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Athlon X2 QL-66 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks basierend auf einer Mischung aus K8 und K10 Architektur. Er besitzt einen integrierten Dual-Channel DDR2 Speicherkontroller und einen einzelnen 1800 MHz 16-Bit HyperTransport Link zum Chipsatz. Verglichen zu den schnelleren Turion X2 Modellen, besitzt der Athlon X2 weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Deep Sleep, nur 2 statt 3 P-States).

Durch den kleinen Level 2 Cache und die K8 Kernteile, kann der QL-66 nicht mit gleichgetakteten Core 2 Duo / Pentium Prozessoren mithalten. Je nach Benchmark liegt die Performance zwischen einem 1.4 GHz und 2.1 GHz Core 2 Duo.

AMD Athlon X2 QL-62

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Athlon X2 QL-62 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks basierend auf einer Mischung aus K8 (Kerne) und K10 Architektur (Speicherkontroller, Crossbar, HyperTransport Links). Er besitzt einen integrierten Dual-Channel DDR2 333MHz Speicherkontroller und einen einzelnen 1800 MHz 16-Bit HyperTransport Link zum Chipsatz. Verglichen zu den schnelleren Turion X2 Ultra Modellen, besitzt der Athlon X2 weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Deep Sleep, nur 2 statt 3 P-States). 

Durch den kleinen Level 2 Cache und die K8 Kernteile, kann der QL-62 nicht mit gleichgetakteten Core 2 Duo / Pentium Prozessoren mithalten und befindet sich nur im Einsteigersegment.

AMD Athlon X2 QL-64

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks basierend auf einer Mischung aus K8 (Kerne) und K10 Architektur (Speicherkontroller, Crossbar, HyperTransport Links. Er besitzt einen integrierten Dual-Channel DDR2 333MHz Speicherkontroller und einen einzelnen 1800 MHz 16-Bit HyperTransport Link zum Chipsatz. Verglichen zu den schnelleren Turion X2 Modellen, besitzt der Athlon X2 weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Deep Sleep, nur 2 statt 3 P-States). Laut den technischen Daten ist er mit dem QL-65 identisch.

Durch den kleinen Level 2 Cache und die K8 Kernteile, kann der QL-64 nicht mit gleichgetakteten Core 2 Duo / Pentium Prozessoren mithalten. Je nach Benchmark liegt die Performance zwischen einem 1.3 GHz und 2.0 GHz Core 2 Duo.

ModelAMD Athlon X2 QL-66AMD Athlon X2 QL-62AMD Athlon X2 QL-64
SeriesAMD Athlon X2AMD Athlon X2AMD Athlon X2
CodenameLionLionLion
Serie: Athlon X2 Lion
AMD Athlon X2 QL-672.2 GHz2 / 2
» AMD Athlon X2 QL-662.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-652.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-642.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-622 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-601.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-672.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-662.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-652.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-642.1 GHz2 / 2
» AMD Athlon X2 QL-622 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-601.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-672.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-662.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-652.1 GHz2 / 2
» AMD Athlon X2 QL-642.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-622 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-601.9 GHz2 / 2
Clock2200 MHz2000 MHz2100 MHz
FSB360036003600
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketS1g2S1g2
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Athlon X2 QL-62AMD Athlon X2 QL-64

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 QL-66 +
min: 1690     avg: 1695     median: 1695 (15%)     max: 1700 Points
95%
1 QL-64 +
min: 1584     avg: 1611     median: 1613.5 (14%)     max: 1634 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 QL-66 +
min: 3300     avg: 3320     median: 3320 (5%)     max: 3340 Points
97%
1 QL-64 +
min: 3172     avg: 3264     median: 3222.5 (4%)     max: 3439 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 QL-64 +
1461 s (17%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 QL-64 +
42.8 s (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 QL-66 +
1520 Points (3%)
97%
1 QL-64 +
min: 1464     avg: 1471     median: 1468 (3%)     max: 1480 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 QL-66 +
46 s (10%)
100%
1 QL-64 +
46 s (10%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 QL-66 +
105 s (4%)
99%
1 QL-64 +
min: 111     avg: 118     median: 118 (5%)     max: 125 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 QL-64 +
2759 s (12%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 QL-66 +
13200 MIPS (6%)
109%
1 QL-64 +
14341 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 QL-66 +
13100 MFLOPS (10%)
98%
1 QL-64 +
12873 MFLOPS (10%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 QL-64 +
min: 3145     avg: 3708     median: 3707.5 (23%)     max: 4270 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 QL-64 +
4.8 Points (69%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 QL-64 +
3056 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon X2 QL-66 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 20. 20:08:11

#0 checking url part for id 556 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 470 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 483 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 18 May 2022 13:12:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.004s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 556 +0s ... 0.004s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 got single benchmarks 556 +0.006s ... 0.01s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 470 +0s ... 0.011s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#24 got single benchmarks 470 +0.008s ... 0.019s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 483 +0s ... 0.019s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.019s

#27 got single benchmarks 483 +0.01s ... 0.029s

#28 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.032s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.035s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#60 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.036s

#61 return log +0s ... 0.036s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)