AMD Athlon X2 QL-66 vs AMD Athlon X2 QL-64

AMD Athlon X2 QL-66

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Athlon X2 QL-66 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks basierend auf einer Mischung aus K8 und K10 Architektur. Er besitzt einen integrierten Dual-Channel DDR2 Speicherkontroller und einen einzelnen 1800 MHz 16-Bit HyperTransport Link zum Chipsatz. Verglichen zu den schnelleren Turion X2 Modellen, besitzt der Athlon X2 weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Deep Sleep, nur 2 statt 3 P-States).

Durch den kleinen Level 2 Cache und die K8 Kernteile, kann der QL-66 nicht mit gleichgetakteten Core 2 Duo / Pentium Prozessoren mithalten. Je nach Benchmark liegt die Performance zwischen einem 1.4 GHz und 2.1 GHz Core 2 Duo.

AMD Athlon X2 QL-64

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks basierend auf einer Mischung aus K8 (Kerne) und K10 Architektur (Speicherkontroller, Crossbar, HyperTransport Links. Er besitzt einen integrierten Dual-Channel DDR2 333MHz Speicherkontroller und einen einzelnen 1800 MHz 16-Bit HyperTransport Link zum Chipsatz. Verglichen zu den schnelleren Turion X2 Modellen, besitzt der Athlon X2 weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Deep Sleep, nur 2 statt 3 P-States). Laut den technischen Daten ist er mit dem QL-65 identisch.

Durch den kleinen Level 2 Cache und die K8 Kernteile, kann der QL-64 nicht mit gleichgetakteten Core 2 Duo / Pentium Prozessoren mithalten. Je nach Benchmark liegt die Performance zwischen einem 1.3 GHz und 2.0 GHz Core 2 Duo.

Model

AMD Athlon X2 QL-66

AMD Athlon X2 QL-64

Series

AMD Athlon X2

AMD Athlon X2

Codename

Lion

Lion

Serie: Athlon X2 Lion

AMD Athlon X2 QL-67	2.2 GHz	2 / 2
» AMD Athlon X2 QL-66	2.2 GHz	2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-65	2.1 GHz	2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-64	2.1 GHz	2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-62	2 GHz	2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-60	1.9 GHz	2 / 2

AMD Athlon X2 QL-67	2.2 GHz	2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-66	2.2 GHz	2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-65	2.1 GHz	2 / 2
» AMD Athlon X2 QL-64	2.1 GHz	2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-62	2 GHz	2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-60	1.9 GHz	2 / 2

Clock

2200 MHz

2100 MHz

FSB

3600

3600

L1 Cache

256 KB

L2 Cache

1 MB

1 MB

Cores / Threads

2 / 2

2 / 2

TDP

35 Watt

35 Watt

Technology

65 nm

65 nm

max. Temp.

100 °C

Socket

S1g2

Features

MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization

MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization

Architecture

x86

x86

Announced

Manufacturer

AMD Athlon X2 QL-64

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)

100%

min: 1690 avg: 1695 median: 1695 (15%) max: 1700 Points

95%

min: 1584 avg: 1611 median: 1613.5 (14%) max: 1634 Points

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)

100%

min: 3300 avg: 3320 median: 3320 (5%) max: 3340 Points

97%

min: 3172 avg: 3264 median: 3222.5 (4%) max: 3439 Points

wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *

100%

1461 s (17%)

wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *

100%

42.8 s (9%)

3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU

100%

1520 Points (3%)

97%

min: 1464 avg: 1471 median: 1468 (3%) max: 1480 Points

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *

100%

46 s (10%)

100%

46 s (10%)

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *

100%

105 s (4%)

99%

min: 111 avg: 118 median: 118 (5%) max: 125 s

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *

100%

2759 s (12%)

SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)

100%

13200 MIPS (6%)

109%

14341 MIPS (7%)

SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)

100%

13100 MFLOPS (10%)

98%

12873 MFLOPS (10%)

PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard

100%

min: 3145 avg: 3708 median: 3707.5 (23%) max: 4270 Points

Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor

100%

4.8 Points (69%)

3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx

100%

3056 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon X2 QL-66 → 100% ⁿ⁼⁷

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 → 99% ⁿ⁼⁷

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte

- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
¹ This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021

v1.17

log 26. 17:45:04

#0 checking url part for id 556 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 483 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 23 Jan 2022 12:10:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.002s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.003s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.003s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#12 composed specs +0s ... 0.004s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 556 +0s ... 0.004s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#16 got single benchmarks 556 +0.006s ... 0.01s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 483 +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#19 got single benchmarks 483 +0.01s ... 0.021s

#20 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.021s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.027s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.028s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#52 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.028s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#54 return log +0.004s ... 0.032s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!

> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head

Autor: Redaktion, 8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)