Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

AMD Athlon X2 QL-67 vs AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 vs AMD Athlon X2 QL-65

AMD Athlon X2 QL-67

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Athlon X2 QL-67 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks basierend auf einer Mischung aus K8 und K10 Architektur. Er besitzt einen integrierten Dual-Channel DDR2 Speicherkontroller und einen einzelnen 1800 MHz 16-Bit HyperTransport Link zum Chipsatz. Verglichen zu den schnelleren Turion X2 Modellen, besitzt der Athlon X2 weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Deep Sleep, nur 2 statt 3 P-States).

Durch den kleinen Level 2 Cache und die K8 Kernteile, kann der QL-67 nicht mit gleichgetakteten Core 2 Duo / Pentium Prozessoren mithalten. Je nach Benchmark liegt die Performance zwischen einem 1.5 GHz und 2.2 GHz Core 2 Duo.

AMD Athlon X2 QL-64

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks basierend auf einer Mischung aus K8 (Kerne) und K10 Architektur (Speicherkontroller, Crossbar, HyperTransport Links. Er besitzt einen integrierten Dual-Channel DDR2 333MHz Speicherkontroller und einen einzelnen 1800 MHz 16-Bit HyperTransport Link zum Chipsatz. Verglichen zu den schnelleren Turion X2 Modellen, besitzt der Athlon X2 weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Deep Sleep, nur 2 statt 3 P-States). Laut den technischen Daten ist er mit dem QL-65 identisch.

Durch den kleinen Level 2 Cache und die K8 Kernteile, kann der QL-64 nicht mit gleichgetakteten Core 2 Duo / Pentium Prozessoren mithalten. Je nach Benchmark liegt die Performance zwischen einem 1.3 GHz und 2.0 GHz Core 2 Duo.

AMD Athlon X2 QL-65

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Athlon X2 QL-65 ist ein Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks basierend auf einer Mischung aus K8 und K10 Architektur. Er besitzt einen integrierten Dual-Channel DDR2 333MHz Speicherkontroller und einen einzelnen 1800 MHz 16-Bit HyperTransport Link zum Chipsatz. Verglichen zu den schnelleren Turion X2 Modellen, besitzt der Athlon X2 weniger Stromsparfunktionen (kein Deep Sleep, nur 2 statt 3 P-States).

Durch den kleinen Level 2 Cache und die K8 Kernteile, kann der QL-65 nicht mit gleichgetakteten Core 2 Duo / Pentium Prozessoren mithalten. Je nach Benchmark liegt die Performance zwischen einem 1.3 GHz und 2.0 GHz Core 2 Duo.

ModelAMD Athlon X2 QL-67AMD Athlon X2 QL-64AMD Athlon X2 QL-65
SeriesAMD Athlon X2AMD Athlon X2AMD Athlon X2
CodenameLionLionLion
Serie: Athlon X2 Lion
» AMD Athlon X2 QL-672.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-662.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-652.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-642.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-622 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-601.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-672.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-662.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-652.1 GHz2 / 2
» AMD Athlon X2 QL-642.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-622 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-601.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-672.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-662.2 GHz2 / 2
» AMD Athlon X2 QL-652.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-642.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-622 GHz2 / 2
AMD Athlon X2 QL-601.9 GHz2 / 2
Clock2200 MHz2100 MHz2100 MHz
FSB400036003600
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
65 nm65 nm65 nm1.075 - 1.125
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketS1g2S1g2
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Athlon X2 QL-64AMD Athlon X2 QL-65

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 QL-64 +
min: 1584     avg: 1611     median: 1613.5 (14%)     max: 1634 Points
101%
1 QL-65 +
1630 Points (15%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 QL-64 +
min: 3172     avg: 3264     median: 3222.5 (4%)     max: 3439 Points
100%
1 QL-65 +
min: 3195     avg: 3213     median: 3212.5 (4%)     max: 3230 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 QL-64 +
1461 s (17%)
103%
1 QL-65 +
1238 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 QL-64 +
42.8 s (9%)
101%
1 QL-65 +
39 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 QL-64 +
min: 1464     avg: 1471     median: 1468 (3%)     max: 1480 Points
101%
1 QL-65 +
min: 1477     avg: 1489     median: 1489 (3%)     max: 1501 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 QL-64 +
46 s (10%)
100%
1 QL-65 +
min: 46.6     avg: 47     median: 47 (10%)     max: 47.4 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 QL-64 +
min: 111     avg: 118     median: 118 (5%)     max: 125 s
100%
1 QL-65 +
108 s (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 QL-64 +
2759 s (12%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 QL-64 +
14341 MIPS (7%)
93%
1 QL-65 +
min: 13210     avg: 13295     median: 13295 (6%)     max: 13380 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 QL-64 +
12873 MFLOPS (10%)
93%
1 QL-65 +
min: 11280     avg: 11940     median: 11940 (9%)     max: 12600 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 QL-64 +
min: 3145     avg: 3708     median: 3707.5 (23%)     max: 4270 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 QL-64 +
4.8 Points (69%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 QL-65 +
4.9 Points (63%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 QL-64 +
3056 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon X2 QL-64 → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks AMD Athlon X2 QL-65 → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 24. 02:12:33

#0 checking url part for id 557 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 483 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 520 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 23 May 2022 13:12:29 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.004s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 557 +0s ... 0.004s

#20 got single benchmarks 557 +0s ... 0.005s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 483 +0s ... 0.005s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#23 got single benchmarks 483 +0.011s ... 0.016s

#24 getting avg benchmarks for device 520 +0s ... 0.016s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#26 got single benchmarks 520 +0.006s ... 0.023s

#27 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.03s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#65 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.031s

#66 return log +0s ... 0.031s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)