, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M600M

NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

► remove from comparison

Die NVIDIA Quadro 2000M ist eine auf die Fermi Architektur basierende professionelle Workstation Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wahrscheinlich auf die selbe Architektur wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 460M bzw GT 555M, bietet ebenfalls 192  Shader (hier genannt CUDA Cores) jedoch nur einen 128 Bit Speicherbus mit DDR3 Grafikspeicher. Die Quadro 2000M ist für die Huron River Plattform (Sandy Bridge) gedacht und wurde von der Quadro K2000M für Ivy Bridge Notebooks abgelöst.

Die Quadro Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip deutlich besser in diesen Bereichen.

Die Recheneinheiten der Quadro 2000M können durch die Schnittstellen DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1, DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE und CUDA angesprochen werden und auch für generelle Aufgaben genutzt werden (nicht nur die Grafikberechnung). Die Fermi Architektur soll außerdem im Insbesonderen auf diese generellen Berechnungen optimiert worden sein, wordurch man eine hohe Performance erwarten kann.

Durch den Einsatz von relativ langsamen DDR3 Grafikspeicher in Verbindung mit dem 128 Bit Speicherbus, kann die 2000M nur 28.8 GB/s übertragen (3000M 80GB/s) und kann dadurch deutlich gebremst werden.

Die Nvidia Quadro 2000M ist kompatibel mit der Steroscopic-Lösung NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro. Weiters wird auch Optimus unterstützt, wodurch automatisch zwischen Prozessorgrafik und Quadro umgeschaltet werden kann (wenn vom Notebookhersteller verbaut).

Die Nvidia Quadro 2000M ist mit 55 Watt TGP spezifiziert und eignet sich daher für Mittelklasse-Notebooks mit 15" Display.

NVIDIA Quadro M600M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M600M

Die NVIDIA Quadro M600M ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 11_0) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Einstiegs-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 950M auf den GM108-Chip der Maxwell-Serie und wird in 28nm bei TSMC hergestellt. Wie bei der GM107 basierenden Quadro K620M / GeForce 940M sind jedoch nur 384 Shader aktiv, trotzdem bietet die M600M einen 128 Bit Speicherbus. Die Grafikkarte ist für die Skylake-Generation gedacht. Es werden bis zu 4 GB GDDR5 als Grafikspeicher eingesetzt die mit 1.250 MHz (5.000 MHz effektiv) getaktet werden und über einen 128 Bit Speicherbus angebunden sind (80 vs 16 GB/s bei der K620M).

Im Lenovo Thinkpad P70 arbeitet die M600M mit 837 - 876 MHz (Boost) und einem Speichertakt von 1253 MHz (5012 MHz effektiv).

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Dank dem 128 Bit großen Speicherbus liegt die Quadro M600M etwa 20 Prozent vor der alten Quadro K620M positionieren und ziemlich genau zwischen den Geschwistern Quadro M500M & Quadro M1000M. Im Consumerbereich wird die GeForce 940MX um etwa 10-15 % überholt, während die GeForce GTX 950M ihrerseits bis zu 20 % schneller arbeitet.

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M600M entspricht laut Nvidia der alten Quadro K620M und liegt bei 30 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption). Dadurch ist die Karte auch für dünne und leichte Notebooks geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro 2000MNVIDIA Quadro M600M
HerstellerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Serie
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameFermi
ArchitekturFermiMaxwell
Pipelines192 - unified384 - unified
Kerntakt550 MHz837 - 876 (Boost) MHz
Shadertakt1100 MHz
Speichertakt900 MHz5012 MHz
Speicherbandbreite128 Bit128 Bit
SpeichertypDDR3GDDR5
Max. Speichergröße2048 MB2048 MB
Shared Memoryneinnein
DirectXDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0
Herstellungsprozess40 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, FP32Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebookgrößemittel (15.4" z.B.)groß (17" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum22.02.2011 02.10.2015
Herstellerseitehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M600M
8.2 pt (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
719 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
631 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
66347 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
13310 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
18491 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
2322 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2430 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
73348 Points (10%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 1416     avg: 1422     median: 1421 (3%)     max: 1428 Points
3216 Points (8%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 1259     avg: 1261     median: 1261 (2%)     max: 1263 Points
2911 Points (5%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 6608     avg: 6634     median: 6633.5 (6%)     max: 6659 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
12734 Points (12%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5391     avg: 5411     median: 5410.5 (5%)     max: 5430 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
10958 Points (10%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
21287 Points (31%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
3DMark 06
min: 11575     avg: 11659     median: 11656 (19%)     max: 11747 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
20563 Points (34%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 14.1     avg: 17     median: 17 (3%)     max: 19.8 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 19.28     avg: 19.3     median: 19.3 (14%)     max: 19.32 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
34.2 fps (24%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 22.13     avg: 22.3     median: 22.3 (37%)     max: 22.52 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
36.7 fps (61%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 32.8     avg: 33.1     median: 33.1 (40%)     max: 33.4 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
47.5 fps (57%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 9.45     avg: 9.6     median: 9.6 (40%)     max: 9.83 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
16.4 fps (68%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 45.28     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (34%)     max: 45.96 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
51.9 fps (39%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 40.8     avg: 41.9     median: 41.9 (45%)     max: 42.93 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
52.3 fps (56%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 17.84     avg: 17.9     median: 17.9 (9%)     max: 17.96 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
27.6 fps (13%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 27.08     avg: 27.4     median: 27.4 (33%)     max: 27.69 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
45.1 fps (55%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
52.4 fps (23%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
24.8 fps (7%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
17.2 fps (7%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
7.5 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
22 fps (9%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.5 fps (1%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
31.7 fps (17%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
27.6 fps (9%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
5671 Points (27%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
6832 Points (32%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 38.3     avg: 38.4     median: 38.4 (14%)     max: 38.44 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
67.1 fps (24%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
75.2 fps (20%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M600M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
59.4 fps (16%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
104 fps (8%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
45.9 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
49.8 fps (0%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
484 Samples/s (2%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1016 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1754 Points (4%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
59.5 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.6 Watt (7%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 2000M → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M600M → 169% n=15

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M600M:
36.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
24.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
23.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
16  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M600M:
73.7  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
42.7  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
16.3  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M600M:
29  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
21.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
11.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
5.8  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M600M:
46.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
28.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
15.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
12.7  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M600M:
83  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
47.9  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
21.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
18.5  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M600M:
43  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
26.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
14.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
7.6  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M600M:
103.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
65.2  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
20.6  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M600M:
127.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
80.2  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M600M:
71.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M600M:
26.9  fps
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 2000M:
86.7  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
75  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
71.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
41.7  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
92  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
59  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 2000M:
92  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
71  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
59.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
35.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
165 243 ~ 204 fps
med. 1360x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
82  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
45  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
23 37 ~ 30 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
64.6  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
46.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
22.8  fps
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 2000M:
200.3  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
74.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
59.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 2000M:
37.6  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
62  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
Quadro 2000M:
36 43 ~ 40 fps
Sims 3

Sims 3

2009
low 800x600
100%
Quadro 2000M:
269  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 2000M:
93  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
Quadro 2000M:
47.9  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 2000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 23. 11:06:23

#0 checking url part for id 2435 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6510 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:23:38 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.066s ... 0.067s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.073s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.073s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.073s

#24 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.073s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 2435 +0.029s ... 0.102s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.103s

#27 got single benchmarks 2435 +0.006s ... 0.109s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.111s

#29 getting avg benchmarks for device 6510 +0.003s ... 0.114s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.115s

#31 got single benchmarks 6510 +0.006s ... 0.121s

#32 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.121s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.123s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.124s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.125s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.127s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.128s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.128s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.131s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.131s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.135s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#103 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.138s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.138s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.138s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.139s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.139s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.139s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.14s

#113 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.14s

#114 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.14s

#115 Got 61 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.146s

#116 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.146s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#120 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#122 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#124 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#127 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#128 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#130 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#134 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#150 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#154 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.148s

#158 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.148s

#159 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.149s

#160 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.149s

#161 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.149s

#162 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.149s

#163 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.15s

#164 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.15s

#165 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.15s

#166 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.15s

#167 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.15s

#168 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.15s

#169 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.15s

#170 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.15s

#171 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.151s

#172 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.151s

#173 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.151s

#174 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.151s

#175 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.152s

#176 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.152s

#177 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.152s

#178 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.152s

#179 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.152s

#180 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.152s

#181 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.152s

#182 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.152s

#183 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.153s

#184 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.153s

#185 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.153s

#186 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.153s

#187 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.153s

#188 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.153s

#189 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.154s

#190 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.154s

#191 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.154s

#192 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#193 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#194 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.154s

#195 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.155s

#196 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#197 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.155s

#198 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#199 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#200 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.155s

#201 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.156s

#202 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.156s

#203 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.156s

#204 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.156s

#205 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.156s

#206 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.156s

#207 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.157s

#208 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.157s

#209 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.157s

#210 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.157s

#211 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.157s

#212 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.157s

#213 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.157s

#214 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.158s

#215 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.158s

#216 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.158s

#217 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.159s

#218 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.159s

#219 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.159s

#220 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.159s

#221 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.159s

#222 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.159s

#223 return log +0.002s ... 0.162s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)