Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

NVIDIA Quadro 3000M

► remove from comparison

Die NVIDIA Quadro 3000M ist eine auf die Fermi Architektur basierende professionelle Workstation Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wahrscheinlich auf die selbe Architektur wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 470M, bietet jedoch 240 Shader (hier genannt CUDA Cores). Sie ist ähnlich wie die 470M mit 75W TDP spezifizert und bietet im Vergleich zu 5010M (100 Watt TDP) keine Unterstützung für ECC Speicher oder Double-Precision-Gleitkommaberechnungen.

Die Quadro Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip deutlich besser in diesen Bereichen.

Die Recheneinheiten der Quadro 3000M können durch die Schnittstellen DirectX 11, OpenGL 4.1, DirectCompute, OpenCL, AXE und CUDA angesprochen werden und auch für generelle Aufgaben genutzt werden (nicht nur die Grafikberechnung). Die Fermi Architektur soll außerdem im Insbesonderen auf diese generellen Berechnungen optimiert worden sein, wordurch man eine hohe Performance erwarten kann.

Die theoretische Rechenleistung sollte sich auf dem Niveau der Consumer GTX 460M bewegen. Diese hat zwar weniger Shader aber eine höhere Taktrate.

Durch den Einsatz von schnellem GDDR5 Grafikspeicher, sollte der 256 Bit Speicherbus nicht zum Flaschenhals der Grafikkarte werden und kann bis zu 80 GB / Sekunde übertragen (5010M 83.2 GB/s, 5000M 76.8 GB/s).

Die Nvidia Quadro 3000M ist kompatibel mit der Steroscopic-Lösung NVIDIA 3D Vision Pro. Weiters wird auch Optimus unterstützt, wodurch automatisch zwischen Prozessorgrafik und Quadro umgeschaltet werden kann (wenn vom Notebookhersteller verbaut).

Wie auch die GeForce GTX 470M, ist die Quadro 3000M mit 75 Watt TDP spezifiziert  und eignet sich daher nur für große und schwere 17" Notebooks.

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Die NVIDIA Quadro M4000M ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 12_1) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige High-End-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 970M auf den GM204-Chip der Maxwell-Serie und wird in 28nm bei TSMC hergestellt. Die Grafikkarte ist für die Skylake-Generation gedacht und Nachfolgerin der Quadro K4100M (Kepler). Es werden bis zu 4 GB GDDR5 als Grafikspeicher eingesetzt die mit 1.250 MHz (5.000 MHz effektiv) getaktet werden und über einen 256 Bit Speicherbus angebunden sind (160 vs 102,4 GB/s bei der K4100M). 

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Derzeit sind noch keine genauen Taktraten bekannt, jedoch positioniert sich die M4000M als zweit-schnellste mobile Quadro Grafikkarte und sollte somit die Kepler basierte Quadro K4100M deutlich schlagen. Im Vergleich zur GeForce GTX 970M bietet die M4000M jedoch andere Taktraten (höherer Basistakt von 975 versus 924 MHz, jedoch geringerer Boost Takt von 1013 versus 1038 MHz).

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M4000M entspricht laut Nvidia der alten Quadro K4100M und liegt bei 100 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption). Dadurch ist die Karte am besten für große 17-Zoll-Notebooks geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro 3000MNVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Quadro M Serie
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameFermi
ArchitekturFermiMaxwell
Pipelines240 - unified1280 - unified
Kerntakt450 MHz975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz
Shadertakt900 MHz
Speichertakt625 MHz5012 MHz
Speicherbandbreite256 Bit256 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Speichergröße2048 MB4 GB
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIDirectX 11, Shader 5.0DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Stromverbrauch75 Watt100 Watt
Herstellungsprozess40 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpenGl 4.1, FP32Optimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebookgrößegroß (17" z.B.)groß (17" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum22.02.2011 02.10.2015
Transistors5.2 Billion
Herstellerseitehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro-for-...

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M4000M
20.4 pt (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
176003 Points (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 13452     avg: 17686     median: 17686 (22%)     max: 21920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
49204 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
6937 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
7723 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
218874 Points (29%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
1742 Points (4%)
min: 9042     avg: 9296     median: 9295.5 (19%)     max: 9549 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
1539 Points (2%)
10259 Points (15%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
7941 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 6604     avg: 6661     median: 6660.5 (5%)     max: 6717 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
3DMark 06
min: 14054     avg: 14221     median: 14220.5 (21%)     max: 14387 Points
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
20.4 fps (15%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
111.4 fps (79%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
22.9 fps (38%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
58.1 fps (97%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
30.1 fps (36%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
61.3 fps (74%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
7.6 fps (32%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
18.8 fps (78%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
42.5 fps (32%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
109.2 fps (82%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
34.7 fps (37%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
76.3 fps (82%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
18.3 fps (9%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
110.2 fps (53%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
24.6 fps (30%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 82.3     avg: 82.3     median: 82.3 (100%)     max: 82.30000305175781 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 80     avg: 88.6     median: 88.6 (38%)     max: 97.1 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 92     avg: 109.9     median: 109.9 (31%)     max: 127.8 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 40.33     avg: 44.5     median: 44.5 (17%)     max: 48.6 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 26.06     avg: 27.2     median: 27.2 (17%)     max: 28.4 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 47.6     avg: 55.8     median: 55.8 (20%)     max: 64 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 6.04     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (16%)     max: 6.9 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 58.3     avg: 68.4     median: 68.4 (37%)     max: 78.4 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 71     avg: 79.6     median: 79.6 (27%)     max: 88.1 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6519 Points (28%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 45.4     avg: 45.5     median: 45.5 (17%)     max: 45.65 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
89.3 fps (33%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
93.2 fps (25%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
5686 Points (11%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M4000M → 369% n=11

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

med. 1366x768
Quadro M4000M:
90  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M4000M:
55  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M4000M:
48  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M4000M:
20  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M4000M:
196  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M4000M:
181  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M4000M:
85  fps
Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
206.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
127.3  fps
med. 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
53.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
11.5  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
66.7  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
39.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
30.4  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
104.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
70.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
43.3  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
113.5  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
71.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro 3000M:
40  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro 3000M:
187.6  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
Quadro 3000M:
52.4  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro 3000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 04. 05:31:26

#0 checking url part for id 2433 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6506 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:25:55 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.044s ... 0.045s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.051s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.051s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.051s

#24 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.051s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 2433 +0.029s ... 0.08s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.08s

#27 got single benchmarks 2433 +0.005s ... 0.086s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 6506 +0.005s ... 0.091s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.091s

#30 got single benchmarks 6506 +0.005s ... 0.096s

#31 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.096s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.097s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.097s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.098s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.098s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.099s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.099s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.099s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.1s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.1s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.1s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.1s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.1s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.101s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.101s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.101s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.102s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.102s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.102s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.103s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.103s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.103s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.104s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.105s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.105s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.106s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.106s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.106s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.107s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.107s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.107s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.107s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.108s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.108s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.109s

#87 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.11s

#88 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.11s

#89 Got 22 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.113s

#90 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.113s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.113s

#98 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.114s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.115s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.115s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.116s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.116s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.117s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.117s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.118s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.118s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.119s

#111 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.119s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.119s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.12s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.12s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.12s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.121s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#118 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#119 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.122s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#121 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.122s

#122 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.122s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.122s

#124 return log +0.002s ... 0.125s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)