Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M

► remove from comparison

CAD Grafikkarte, die wahrscheinlich auf die 8400M GS basiert (eventuell auch nur 8400M G). Jedoch spricht der Stromverbrauch von 17 Watt für etwas mehr Leistung (11 W 8400M GS, 10 W 8400M G).

Die Quadro Grafikkarten werden mit zertifizierten Treibern ausgeliefert, die eine Stabile und fehlerfreie Ausführung von professionellen Anwendungen sicherstellen sollen. Ausserdem sind einige Features des Grafikchips hier aktiviert, die z.b. Drahtgitterdarstellungen beschleunigen.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M

Die NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M basiert auf die NVIDIA GeForce Go 7300 und ist eine professionelle 3D Anwendungs-Grafikkarte (wie 3D Studio Max oder CAD Programme), die im unteren Leistungssegment angeordnet ist. Durch die professionellen Treiber bietet sie eine hohe Anwendungsleistung und workstationgerechte Qualität.

Die Treiber der Quadro FX Serie sind zertifiziert für CAD Anwendungen (z.B. AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ...) und DCC Anwendungen (z.B. Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...) und bieten eine 12-Bit-Präzision für Subpixel, Vollbild-Antialiasing, Hardwarebeschleunigtes Antialiasing für Punkte und Linien und weitere für CAD und DCC optimierte Einstellungen.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

Die Quadro FX 770M ist eine professionelle Midrange Grafikkarte für Notebooks / mobile Workstations. Der Haupteinsatzzweck der FX770M sind CAD, DCC und Visualisierungsapplikationen. Für die populärsten Anwendungen sind die Treiber der Quadro Serie auch zertifiziert (garantieren den einwandfreien Betrieb).

Technisch basiert die Quadro FX 770M auf den Chip der GeForce 9600M GT und bietet daher die selben Features (PureVideo HD). Auch die theoretische Spieleleistung ist vergleichbar, jedoch kann es zu einer schlechteren Performance (durch die auf Anwendungen / OpenGL optimierten Treiber) kommen.

Speziell bei OpenGL zeigt die Quadro eine deutlich bessere Performance als die Consumer 9600M GT. Im Cinebench R10 OpenGL Test rechnet die 770M ungefähr doppelt so schnell wie die 9600M GT.

Wie die gesamte GeForce 9000M Serie, bietet die 770M auch CUDA Unterstützung. 

NVIDIA Quadro FX 360MNVIDIA Quadro FX 350MNVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Quadro FX Serie
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB8M-GLMG72MNB9P-GLM
Pipelines16 - unified4 / 3 Pixel- / Vertexshader32 - unified
Kerntakt400 MHz450 MHz500 MHz
Shadertakt800 MHz1250 MHz
Speichertakt600 MHz350 MHz800 MHz
Speicherbandbreite64 Bit64 Bit128 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR3DDR-3GDDR2 / GDDR3
Max. Speichergröße256 MB64 MB512 MB
Shared Memoryneinneinnein
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Stromverbrauch17 Watt15 Watt35 Watt
Transistors210 Million112 Million314 Million
Herstellungsprozess80 nm90 nm65 nm
Features800 MHZ Shader-Taktfrequenz, PureVideo Technologie (H.264, VC-1, MPEG2, WMV9 Decodierbeschleunigung), HDCP-fähig, PowerMizer 7.0 Energieverwaltung (dynamisches umschalten zwischen Leistung und Energiesparen), HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting), designed für Windows Vista, 16x Vollbild AA, 16x winkelunabhängiges AF, 128-Bit HDR Ausleuchtung mit AA, PCI-E 16x, OpenGL 2.1, Gigathread TechnologiePureVideo, UltraShadow II, Intellisample 4.0, CineFX 4.0, PowerMizer 6.0, High Dynamic-Range (HDR) LighningOpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, 12-Bit Subpixel-Präzision, 128 Bit Grafikpipeline
Erscheinungsdatum09.05.2007 31.03.2006 14.08.2008
Herstellerseitehttp://www.nvidia.de/page/geforce_8400M....http://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...
Informationen90nm, 112 Mio Transistoren, PCI-E
ArchitekturG9x
Notebookgrößemittel (15.4" z.B.)

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 13650     avg: 15054     median: 15053.5 (16%)     max: 16457 Points
34871 Points (36%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 5580     avg: 6010     median: 6010 (3%)     max: 6440 Points
3963 Points (2%)
17192 Points (9%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 3365     avg: 3372     median: 3372 (5%)     max: 3379 Points
1954 Points (3%)
11161 Points (16%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
3DMark 06
1490 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
min: 5230     avg: 5297     median: 5296.5 (8%)     max: 5363 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
3DMark 06
1572 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
3DMark 06
680 Points (1%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
33.1 Points (69%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
40.1 Points (84%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
31.7 Points (67%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
85.1 Points (46%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
36.1 Points (71%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
55 Points (81%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
19 Points (49%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
17.5 Points (36%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
2985 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
6180 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M → 62% n=2

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M → 309% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
94.2  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
10.1  fps
387%
Quadro FX 770M:
39  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
19.5  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
84.7  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
7.4  fps
479%
Quadro FX 770M:
35.4  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
18.1  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
328  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
62  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
17  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
Quadro FX 770M:
165.2  fps
med. 640x480
Quadro FX 770M:
171.3  fps
high 800x600
Quadro FX 770M:
158.7  fps
ultra 1024x768
Quadro FX 770M:
126.1  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 360M:
242.7  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M → 433%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 433%

Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

v1.17
log 19. 12:08:19

#0 checking url part for id 513 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 70 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 884 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 18 Aug 2022 17:26:37 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.056s ... 0.057s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.059s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.059s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.059s

#40 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.059s

#41 getting avg benchmarks for device 513 +0.037s ... 0.096s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.097s

#43 got single benchmarks 513 +0.007s ... 0.104s

#44 getting avg benchmarks for device 70 +0s ... 0.104s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.105s

#46 got single benchmarks 70 +0.004s ... 0.109s

#47 getting avg benchmarks for device 884 +0s ... 0.109s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.109s

#49 got single benchmarks 884 +0.007s ... 0.116s

#50 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.116s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.118s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.118s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.119s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.119s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.119s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.119s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.12s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.12s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.12s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.121s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.121s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.122s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.123s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.123s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.124s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.124s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.125s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.125s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.126s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.126s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.126s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.127s

#76 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.127s

#77 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.127s

#78 Got 16 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.13s

#79 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.13s

#80 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.132s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.134s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.136s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.138s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.138s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.138s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.139s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.139s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.139s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.139s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.141s

#97 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.141s

#98 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.141s

#99 return log +0.001s ... 0.142s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)