NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

► remove

Die Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M ist eine mobile Grafikkarte für Workstation-Laptops. Sie basiert auf die selbe Architektur wie die GeForce 9800M GTX jedoch bietet sie die vollen 128 Shaderprozessoren des G92 Chips (9800M GTX nur 112). Daher ist sie vergleichbar zur GTX 280M, jedoch wird sie noch in 65nm gefertigt und geringer getaktet.

Zur Zeitpunkt der Veröffentlichung war sie die schnellste Quadro Karte für Notebooks. An 1. Dezember 2009 wurde sie jedoch von der Quadro FX 3800M abgelöst (ebenfalls 128 Shader Cores, jedoch bereits in 55nm gerfertigt und daher mit höheren Taktraten).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Die Nvidia Quadro FX 3800M ist eine mobile Grafikkarte für Workstation-Laptops. Sie basiert auf die selbe Architektur wie die GeForce GTX 280M und bietet die vollen 128 Shaderprozessoren des G92 Chips. Im Vergleich zum FX 3700M ist die FX 3800M höher getaktet und wird bereits in 55nm gefertigt.

Im Vergleich zu einer GTX 280M, sind die Taktraten nochmals deutlich höher. Daher weist die FX3800M auch einen höheren Stromverbrauch auf und eine bessere Performance. Die Spieleperformance ist jedoch, durch die auf professionelle 3D Anwendung spezialisierten Treiber, etwas geringer.

Die zertifizierten Treiber der Quadro FX Serie sorgen für eine optimierten Stabilität, Kompatibilität und Performance bei Professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin- und Prospektionsanwendungen). Besonders die OpenGL Performance soll bei den Quadro FX Karten im Vergleich zu GeForce Modellen deutlich besser sein.

Im Viewperf 10.0 Test kann sich die FX 3800M deutlich von der alten FX 3700M abheben (wahrscheinlich auch durch die schnelleren Prozessoren in den neuen Notebooks). 

Zur Zeitpunkt der Veröffentlichung ist sie die schnellste professionelle Grafikkarte für Notebooks und eignet sich daher auch für die Bearbeitung von komplexen 3D Modellen.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700MNVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro FX Series
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M (compare) 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M (compare) 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M (compare) 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M (compare) 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M (compare) 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M (compare) 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M (compare) 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M (compare) 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M (compare) 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M (compare) 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M (compare) 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M (compare) 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M (compare) 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M (compare) 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M (compare) 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M (compare) 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 675 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 550 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M (compare) 96 @ 600 MHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M (compare) 96 @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M (compare) 72 @ 560 MHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M (compare) 48 @ 530 MHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M (compare) 48 @ 550 MHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M (compare) 24/8 cores @ 575 MHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M (compare) 24/8 cores @ 500 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M (compare) 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M (compare) 32 @ 625 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M (compare) 20/7 cores @ 375 MHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M (compare) 32 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M (compare) 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M (compare) 16 @ 625 MHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M (compare) 8 @ 580 MHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M (compare) 16 @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M (compare) 4/3 cores @ 450 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB9E-GLM3N10E-GLM4
ArchitectureG9xG9x
128 - 128 -
Core550 MHz675 MHz
Shader1375 MHz1688 MHz
Memory800 MHz1000 MHz
Bus256 Bit256 Bit
MemoryGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Memory1024 MB1024 MB
nono
DirectXDirectX 10, 4.0DirectX 10, 4.0
Transistors754 Million754 Million
Technology65 nm55 nm
FeaturesOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0OpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0
Size
Introduced14.08.2008 20.12.2009
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...

3DMark Vantage
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
P Result 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
P GPU no PhysX 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
min: 32886     avg: 34790     median: 34790 (36%)     max: 36694 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 33146     avg: 37082     median: 38191 (20%)     max: 39909 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
15759 Points (34%)
min: 16593     avg: 18198.7     median: 18043 (39%)     max: 19960 Points
3DMark 06 Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
+ NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3ds Max 1280x1024
25.5 fps (53%)
32.8 fps (68%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia 1280x1024
32 fps (68%)
45.8 fps (97%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight 1280x1024
34.6 fps (74%)
47.4 fps (101%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya 1280x1024
59.6 fps (32%)
59.7 fps (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer 1280x1024
29.8 fps (58%)
51.1 fps (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks 1280x1024
54.6 fps (81%)
59.7 fps (89%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter 1280x1024
22 fps (58%)
38.5 fps (101%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX 1280x1024
26.4 fps (55%)
35.3 fps (74%)
SPECviewperf 11
Siemens NX 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Tcvis 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SolidWorks 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Pro/ENGINEER 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Maya 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Lightwave 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Ensight 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Catia 1920x1080 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Windows 7 Experience Index - Gaming graphics
6.9 points (99%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Graphics
6.9 points (99%)
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
OpenGL 64Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M → 117%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
230.6  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
124.2  fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
»
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
64.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 3800M:
31.8  fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
»
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
78.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 3800M:
40.9  fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
»
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
Quadro FX 3800M:
97  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
82  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro FX 3800M:
29.9  fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
»
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
Quadro FX 3800M:
142.8  fps
ultra 1280x1024
Quadro FX 3800M:
61.9  fps
Quadro FX 3800M:
»
GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 3700M:
55.6  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.9  fps
high 1280x1024
100%
Quadro FX 3700M:
19.1  fps
Quadro FX 3700M:
»
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.2  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 3700M:
45.2  fps
Quadro FX 3700M:
»

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M → 100%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 18.09.2017)