Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Die Nvidia Quadro FX 3800M ist eine mobile Grafikkarte für Workstation-Laptops. Sie basiert auf die selbe Architektur wie die GeForce GTX 280M und bietet die vollen 128 Shaderprozessoren des G92 Chips. Im Vergleich zum FX 3700M ist die FX 3800M höher getaktet und wird bereits in 55nm gefertigt.

Im Vergleich zu einer GTX 280M, sind die Taktraten nochmals deutlich höher. Daher weist die FX3800M auch einen höheren Stromverbrauch auf und eine bessere Performance. Die Spieleperformance ist jedoch, durch die auf professionelle 3D Anwendung spezialisierten Treiber, etwas geringer.

Die zertifizierten Treiber der Quadro FX Serie sorgen für eine optimierten Stabilität, Kompatibilität und Performance bei Professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin- und Prospektionsanwendungen). Besonders die OpenGL Performance soll bei den Quadro FX Karten im Vergleich zu GeForce Modellen deutlich besser sein.

Im Viewperf 10.0 Test kann sich die FX 3800M deutlich von der alten FX 3700M abheben (wahrscheinlich auch durch die schnelleren Prozessoren in den neuen Notebooks). 

Zur Zeitpunkt der Veröffentlichung ist sie die schnellste professionelle Grafikkarte für Notebooks und eignet sich daher auch für die Bearbeitung von komplexen 3D Modellen.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M

► remove from comparison

Performance Workstation Grafikchip mit DirectX 10 und OpenGL 2.1 Unterstützung der wahrscheinlich auf die NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT basiert.

Gedacht für Digital Content Creators, Ingenieure, Geowissenschaftler und andere professionelle 3D Anwendungen.

Die Treiber der Quadro FX Serie sind zertifiziert für CAD Anwendungen (z.B. AutoCad, Inventor, Solidstation, Solid Edge, ...) und DCC Anwendungen (z.B. Maya, 3DS Max, Lightwave 3D, ...) und bieten eine 12-Bit-Präzision für Subpixel, Vollbild-Antialiasing, Hardwarebeschleunigtes Antialiasing für Punkte und Linien und weitere für CAD und DCC optimierte Einstellungen.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

Die NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M ist eine Grafikkarte für mobile Workstations (Calpella Platform) mit 15" Bildschirm. Sie basiert technisch auf die GeForce GT 335M (selber Chip) wird jedoch mit einem speziellen BIOS und professionellen Treibern ausgeliefert. Im Unterschied zur GT 335M kann die FX1800M auch mit schnellem GDDR5 Grafikspeicher ausgerüstet werden und anscheinend wird der Kern auch höher getaktet.

Die Quadro FX 1800M basiert auf einen in 40nm gefertigten Grafikchip welcher DirectX 10.1 und OpenGL 3.2 beherrscht. Die 72 1-dimensionalen Shader können in etwa mit 300-400 Shader von AMD verglichen werden da diese in 5-dimensionalen Gruppen ausgeführt werden.

Die zertifizierten Treiber der FX 1800M garantieren einen reibungslosen Betrieb und eine schnellere Darstellung von professionellen Applikationen (CAD, DCC). Auf nvidia.com findet man eine Liste der zertifizierten Anwendungen wie z.B. Premiere, Photoshop, After Effect, AutoCAD, 3ds Max, trueSpace, Blender, Catia, IronCAD, Cinema 4D, Lightwave 3D, Softimage, Mathematica ... Besonders OpenGL Anwendungen werden durch die Quadro FX Treiber deutlich beschleunigt.

Die Spieleleistung ist vergleichbar mit der Mittelklasse GeForce GT 335M, jedoch kann es durch die Applikationsoptimierung der Treiber zu kleinen Nachteilen im Vergleich zu einer GeForce Grafikkarte kommen. Spieler sollten eher zu einer GeForce Grafikkarte greifen, da die Forceware Treiber öfter gewartet werden und daher bei Spielen schneller und fehlerfreier arbeiten. Trotzdem sollte die FX 1800M die meisten aktuellen Spiele (2009 - 2010) bei mittleren Details flüssig darstellen können.

Durch CUDA, OpenCL und DirectCompute können die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte auch für andere Applikationen benutzt werden (z.B. Encoding von Videos). Dank PureVideo HD Support kann die Quadro FX 1800M HD Videos mittels des VP4 Videoprozessors dekodieren und so die CPU entlasten.

Der Grafikchip unterstützt das automatische Umschalten von der integrierten Grafikkarte mit Optimus obwohl die ersten Workstations aufgrund der langen Entwicklungszeit dies noch nicht unterstützen (nicht nachrüstbar!).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800MNVIDIA Quadro FX 570MNVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Quadro FX Serie
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameN10E-GLM4G64GLM
ArchitekturG9xG8xGT2xx
Pipelines128 - unified32 - unified72 - unified
Kerntakt675 MHz475 MHz560 MHz
Shadertakt1688 MHz950 MHz1125 MHz
Speichertakt1000 MHz700 MHz1100 MHz
Speicherbandbreite256 Bit128 Bit128 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR3GDDR3DDR3, GDDR5
Max. Speichergröße1024 MB256 MB1024 MB
Shared Memoryneinneinnein
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10.1, Shader 4.1
Stromverbrauch100 Watt35 Watt45 Watt
Transistors754 Million289 Million
Herstellungsprozess55 nm80 nm40 nm
FeaturesOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0PowerMizer 9.0, EnergyStar (3.8W), 16x FSAA Support, CUDA, NVIEW, OpenGL 3.2
Notebookgrößegroß (17" z.B.)mittel (15.4" z.B.)mittel (15.4" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum20.12.2009 01.06.2007 01.02.2010
Herstellerseitehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.de/page/quadrofx_go.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...
InformationenPowermizer 7.0, CG Shading Hochsprache, 32 Bit Gleitkommapräzision, 12 Bit Subpixel Präzision, 128 Bit Genauigkeit der Grafikpipeline, Vertex und Pixelshader Programmierbarkeit, PureVideo HD, PCI-E Interface, FSAA mit gedrehtem Raster, nView Multidisplay Support, High-Precision Dynamic-Range (HPDR) Technologie, Hardware 3D Clipping nach Fensterkennung, Vollbild Antialiasing

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 6584     avg: 6951     median: 6779 (6%)     max: 7491 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
min: 3444     avg: 3452     median: 3451.5 (3%)     max: 3459 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 5758     avg: 5926     median: 6002 (5%)     max: 6019 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
min: 2774     avg: 2801     median: 2800.5 (2%)     max: 2827 Points
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 32886     avg: 34790     median: 34790 (36%)     max: 36694 Points
min: 24479     avg: 26908     median: 26907.5 (28%)     max: 29336 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 33146     avg: 37082     median: 38191 (20%)     max: 39909 Points
min: 11586     avg: 11958     median: 11957.5 (6%)     max: 12329 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 16593     avg: 18199     median: 18043 (25%)     max: 19960 Points
min: 7674     avg: 7790     median: 7700 (11%)     max: 7997 Points
15249 Points (21%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
3DMark 06
13232 Points (20%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
3883 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
3DMark 06
min: 12050     avg: 12765     median: 12923 (20%)     max: 13323 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
3800 Points (6%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
min: 7416     avg: 7573     median: 7572.5 (11%)     max: 7729 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
3DMark 06
3904 Points (6%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
32.8 Points (68%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
45.8 Points (96%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
min: 47.37     avg: 47.4     median: 47.4 (100%)     max: 47.369998931884766 Points
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
59.7 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
min: 51.1     avg: 51.1     median: 51.1 (100%)     max: 51.099998474121094 Points
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
59.7 Points (88%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
38.5 Points (100%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
35.3 Points (72%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
18.8 fps (13%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
12.4 fps (9%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
18.7 fps (31%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
13 fps (22%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
30.6 fps (37%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
28.1 fps (34%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
6.9 fps (29%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
7.5 fps (31%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
16.6 fps (12%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
16.6 fps (13%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
38.4 fps (41%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
39 fps (42%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
16.2 fps (8%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
12.3 fps (6%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
23.4 fps (28%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
17.5 fps (21%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
6.6 Points (84%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
6.9 Points (87%)
5 Points (63%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4429     avg: 4928     median: 4928 (21%)     max: 5427 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
4534 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 32.07     avg: 32.7     median: 32.7 (12%)     max: 33.29 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
9.3 fps (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
20 fps (7%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M → 34% n=3

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M → 68% n=3

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Fifa 11

Fifa 11

2010
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
230.6  fps
high 1360x768
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
124.2  fps
Risen

Risen

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
64.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
31.8  fps
Need for Speed Shift

Need for Speed Shift

2009
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
78.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
40.9  fps
Colin McRae: DIRT 2

Colin McRae: DIRT 2

2009
low 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
97  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
82  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
29.9  fps
Anno 1404

Anno 1404

2009
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
142.8  fps
ultra 1280x1024
100%
Quadro FX 3800M:
61.9  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
Quadro FX 570M:
436  fps
med. 800x600
Quadro FX 570M:
128  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 570M:
19 22 24 29 43 43 45 49 ~ 34 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
Quadro FX 570M:
118  fps
med. 640x480
Quadro FX 570M:
116.7  fps
high 800x600
Quadro FX 570M:
111.3  fps
ultra 1024x768
Quadro FX 570M:
89.7  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 570M:
501  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

v1.17
log 17. 19:51:39

#0 checking url part for id 1541 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 182 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1649 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 15 May 2022 17:25:14 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.058s ... 0.058s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.061s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#38 composed specs +0s ... 0.062s

#39 did output specs +0s ... 0.062s

#40 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.062s

#41 getting avg benchmarks for device 1541 +0.045s ... 0.106s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.107s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.111s

#44 got single benchmarks 1541 +0.006s ... 0.116s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 182 +0s ... 0.116s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.117s

#47 got single benchmarks 182 +0.006s ... 0.123s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 1649 +0s ... 0.123s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.124s

#50 got single benchmarks 1649 +0.006s ... 0.13s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.13s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.131s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.131s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.131s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.132s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.133s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.133s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.134s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.134s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.136s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.136s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.137s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.137s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.137s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.138s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.037s ... 0.174s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.175s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.175s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.175s

#79 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.175s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.175s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.176s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.176s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.176s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.176s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.177s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.177s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.178s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.178s

#89 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.179s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.179s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.179s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.18s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.181s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.182s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.182s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.183s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.183s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.184s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.184s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.185s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.186s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.186s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.187s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.188s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.188s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.189s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.189s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.19s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.19s

#110 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.191s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.191s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.193s

#113 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.193s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.193s

#115 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.195s

#116 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.195s

#117 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.195s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.196s

#119 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.196s

#120 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.196s

#121 Got 26 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.2s

#122 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.2s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.2s

#124 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.202s

#125 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.204s

#126 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.204s

#127 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.205s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.205s

#129 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.206s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.206s

#131 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.207s

#132 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.207s

#133 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.207s

#134 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.208s

#135 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.208s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.209s

#137 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.209s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.209s

#139 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.209s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.209s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.209s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.209s

#143 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.209s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.209s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.21s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.21s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.21s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.21s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.211s

#150 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.211s

#151 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.211s

#152 return log +0.001s ... 0.212s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)