, , , , , ,
zu verknüpfen.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M

Die Quadro FX 770M ist eine professionelle Midrange Grafikkarte für Notebooks / mobile Workstations. Der Haupteinsatzzweck der FX770M sind CAD, DCC und Visualisierungsapplikationen. Für die populärsten Anwendungen sind die Treiber der Quadro Serie auch zertifiziert (garantieren den einwandfreien Betrieb).

Technisch basiert die Quadro FX 770M auf den Chip der GeForce 9600M GT und bietet daher die selben Features (PureVideo HD). Auch die theoretische Spieleleistung ist vergleichbar, jedoch kann es zu einer schlechteren Performance (durch die auf Anwendungen / OpenGL optimierten Treiber) kommen.

Speziell bei OpenGL zeigt die Quadro eine deutlich bessere Performance als die Consumer 9600M GT. Im Cinebench R10 OpenGL Test rechnet die 770M ungefähr doppelt so schnell wie die 9600M GT.

Wie die gesamte GeForce 9000M Serie, bietet die 770M auch CUDA Unterstützung. 

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

► remove from comparison

Die Nvidia Quadro FX 3700M ist eine mobile Grafikkarte für Workstation-Laptops. Sie basiert auf die selbe Architektur wie die GeForce 9800M GTX jedoch bietet sie die vollen 128 Shaderprozessoren des G92 Chips (9800M GTX nur 112). Daher ist sie vergleichbar zur GTX 280M, jedoch wird sie noch in 65nm gefertigt und geringer getaktet.

Zur Zeitpunkt der Veröffentlichung war sie die schnellste Quadro Karte für Notebooks. An 1. Dezember 2009 wurde sie jedoch von der Quadro FX 3800M abgelöst (ebenfalls 128 Shader Cores, jedoch bereits in 55nm gerfertigt und daher mit höheren Taktraten).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 770MNVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
HerstellerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro FX Serie
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M compare 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB9P-GLMNB9E-GLM3
ArchitekturG9xG9x
Pipelines32 - unified128 - unified
Kerntakt500 MHz550 MHz
Shadertakt1250 MHz1375 MHz
Speichertakt800 MHz800 MHz
Speicherbandbreite128 Bit256 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR2 / GDDR3GDDR3
Max. Speichergröße512 MB1024 MB
Shared Memoryneinnein
DirectXDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Transistors314 Million754 Million
Herstellungsprozess65 nm65 nm
FeaturesOpenGL 2.1, PowerMizer 8.0, 12-Bit Subpixel-Präzision, 128 Bit GrafikpipelineOpenGL 2.1, CUDA, PowerMizer 8.0
Notebookgrößemittel (15.4" z.B.)groß (17" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum14.08.2008 14.08.2008
Herstellerseitehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_qua...

Benchmarks

3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
5053 Points (5%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
4326 Points (4%)
3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
34871 Points (36%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
17192 Points (9%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
11161 Points (16%)
15759 Points (23%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
3DMark 06
min: 5230     avg: 5297     median: 5296.5 (9%)     max: 5363 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
min: 10430     avg: 10847     median: 11000 (18%)     max: 11111 Points
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - 3dsmax
33.1 Points (69%)
25.5 Points (53%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Catia
40.1 Points (84%)
32 Points (67%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - EnSight
31.7 Points (67%)
34.6 Points (73%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Maya
85.1 Points (46%)
59.6 Points (32%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - Pro/Engeneer
36.1 Points (71%)
29.8 Points (58%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SolidWorks
55 Points (82%)
54.6 Points (81%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS Teamcenter
19 Points (49%)
22 Points (57%)
SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - SPEC Viewperf 10.0 - UGS NX
17.5 Points (36%)
26.4 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6180 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
4481 Points (19%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
29.8 fps (11%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M → 110% n=11

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

GTA IV - Grand Theft Auto

2008
low 800x600
Quadro FX 3700M:
55.6  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.9  fps
high 1280x1024
Quadro FX 3700M:
19.1  fps
Supreme Commander - FA Bench

Supreme Commander - FA Bench

2007
med. 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
39.2  fps
high 1024x768
Quadro FX 3700M:
45.2  fps
Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
94.2  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
39  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
19.5  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
84.7  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
35.4  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
18.1  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
165.2  fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
171.3  fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
158.7  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 770M:
126.1  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 20:53:07

#0 checking url part for id 884 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 885 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 25 Jan 2022 16:23:41 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.08s ... 0.081s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.083s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.083s

#22 composed specs +0s ... 0.083s

#23 did output specs +0s ... 0.083s

#24 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.083s

#25 getting avg benchmarks for device 884 +0.029s ... 0.112s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.113s

#27 got single benchmarks 884 +0.006s ... 0.119s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 885 +0s ... 0.12s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.12s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.12s

#31 got single benchmarks 885 +0.005s ... 0.126s

#32 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.126s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.127s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.128s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.128s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.129s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.129s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.13s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.13s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.13s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.131s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.131s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.132s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.132s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.133s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.134s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.135s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.136s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.137s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.137s

#61 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.137s

#62 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.137s

#63 Got 15 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.14s

#64 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.14s

#65 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.141s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.143s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.143s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.143s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.144s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.144s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.145s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.145s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.145s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.146s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.146s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.147s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.147s

#81 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.147s

#82 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.147s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.051s ... 0.198s

#84 return log +0.002s ... 0.2s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)