NVIDIA Quadro M2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

► remove NVIDIA Quadro M2200

Die NVIDIA Quadro M2200 ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 12_1) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Mittelklasse-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GTX 965M (2. Generation) auf den GM206 Chip mit Maxwell Architektur und noch nicht Pascal wie die stärkeren P-Quadros.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Der maximale Kerntakt der Quadro M2200 liegt bei 1.038 MHz. Die Leistung liegt zwischen der alten Quadro M2000M sowie der Quadro M3000M, liegt aber generell näher an der M3000M (in einigen Fällen sogar gleichauf). Wenig überraschend liegt die Leistung beim Spielen etwa auf dem Niveau der GTX 965M (2. Generation) und knapp hinter der aktuellen GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M2200M entspricht laut Nvidia der alten Quadro M2000M und liegt bei 55 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption) bzw 39,1 Watt TDP. Dadurch ist die Karte am besten für 15-Zoll-Notebooks geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro M500M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro M500M

Die NVIDIA Quadro M500M ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 11_0) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Einstiegs-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 930M auf den GM108-Chip der Maxwell-Serie und wird in 28nm bei TSMC hergestellt. Der Unterschied zur ebenfalls GM108 basierten Quadro K620M ist nicht bekannt (ev nur ein Renaming).

Die Grafikkarte ist für die Skylake-Generation gedacht. Es werden bis zu 2 GB DDR3 als Grafikspeicher eingesetzt und über einen 64 Bit Speicherbus angebunden sind (anscheinend geringer getaktet da nur 14.4 vs 16 GB/s bei der K620M angegeben werden). 

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Derzeit sind noch keine genauen Taktraten bekannt, jedoch sollte sich die Quadro M500M durch den geringeren Speicherdurchsatz etwas hinter der Quadro K620M positionieren.

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M500M entspricht laut Nvidia der alten Quadro K620M und der schnelleren M600M und liegt bei 30 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption). Dadurch ist die Karte auch für dünne und leichte Notebooks geeignet.

Die Nvidia Quadro M500M wird anfangs nur in den Lenovo Thinkpad Yoga P40 und Thinkpad P50s Notebooks verbaut (siehe unsere Newsmeldung hierzu).

NVIDIA Quadro M2200NVIDIA Quadro M500M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
CodenameN17P-Q3
ArchitectureMaxwellMaxwell
Cores1024 - unified384 - unified
Core694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz
Memory5508 MHz4004 MHz
Bus128 Bit64 Bit
MemoryGDDR5DDR3
Max. Memory4096 MB2048 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 12_1, 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), 5.0
Transistors4940 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Size2/32/3
Introduced13.01.2017 15.12.2015
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
22.4 pt (24%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1845     avg: 1889     median: 1903 (11%)     max: 1920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1699     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (9%)     max: 1750 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 280203     avg: 289176     median: 289176 (46%)     max: 298148 Points
126522 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 24523     avg: 33578     median: 33578 (5%)     max: 42633 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20388     avg: 21012     median: 20644 (27%)     max: 22003 Points
min: 5986     avg: 6299     median: 6359 (8%)     max: 6491 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 36877     avg: 37505     median: 37796 (19%)     max: 37841 Points
min: 8211     avg: 8403     median: 8348 (4%)     max: 8703 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5232     avg: 5253     median: 5252 (16%)     max: 5275 Points
min: 1387     avg: 1401     median: 1391.5 (4%)     max: 1432 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5786     avg: 5835     median: 5850 (13%)     max: 5869 Points
min: 1585     avg: 1596     median: 1594.5 (4%)     max: 1610 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 127867     avg: 195445     median: 195444 (26%)     max: 263022 Points
min: 26395     avg: 38225     median: 40554 (5%)     max: 45396 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7453     avg: 7581     median: 7581 (20%)     max: 7709 Points
min: 2350     avg: 2431     median: 2447 (6%)     max: 2478 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7319     avg: 7372     median: 7372 (13%)     max: 7425 Points
min: 2222     avg: 2341     median: 2364.5 (4%)     max: 2412 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 23.2     avg: 26.4     median: 27.9 (15%)     max: 28.1 fps
min: 6.1     avg: 6.3     median: 6.3 (3%)     max: 6.5 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
min: 21     avg: 21.4     median: 21.4 (7%)     max: 21.7 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
min: 19.1     avg: 19.6     median: 19.6 (9%)     max: 20 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 28.4     avg: 28.7     median: 28.7 (5%)     max: 28.9 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
219 fps (24%)
67.9 fps (7%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
59.9 fps (16%)
28.5 fps (8%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
111 fps (25%)
28.9 fps (7%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
60 fps (23%)
12.4 fps (5%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1204     avg: 1276     median: 1306 (13%)     max: 1318 Samples/s
min: 328     avg: 353     median: 354 (4%)     max: 378 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2086     avg: 2097     median: 2099 (14%)     max: 2107 Samples/s
min: 618     avg: 804     median: 850 (6%)     max: 945 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4332 (10%)
min: 1690     avg: 1741     median: 1741 (4%)     max: 1792
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.5 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.2 Watt (18%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M500M → 41% n=41

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
83.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
37.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
33.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
17.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
78  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
52.3 54.8 ~ 54 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
50.5 51.9 ~ 51 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
36.2 37.5 ~ 37 fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M2200:
14.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
139.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
105.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
42  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M500M:
49.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
28.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
22.2  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
123 128.7 ~ 126 fps
24%
Quadro M500M:
30.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
68.5 71.6 72.8 ~ 71 fps
26%
Quadro M500M:
18.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
37.4 40.7 41.6 ~ 40 fps
26%
Quadro M500M:
10.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
33 34.4 35.2 ~ 34 fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M2200:
13.7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
214.2  fps
26%
Quadro M500M:
46.9 65.4 ~ 56 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
131.2  fps
27%
Quadro M500M:
32.4 38.2 ~ 35 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.4  fps
28%
Quadro M500M:
19.2 20.2 ~ 20 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
52.4  fps
25%
Quadro M500M:
11.9 13.1 ~ 13 fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
35.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
29.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
16.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
14.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.8  fps
38%
Quadro M500M:
56.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
119  fps
28%
Quadro M500M:
33.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
56.4  fps
27%
Quadro M500M:
15.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
48.2  fps
27%
Quadro M500M:
13  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M500M:
27  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
21  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
10  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
104.6 116.6 ~ 111 fps
27%
Quadro M500M:
29 30.5 ~ 30 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
63.4 66.6 68.4 ~ 66 fps
27%
Quadro M500M:
17.9 18.9 ~ 18 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
30.3 37.2 37.8 ~ 35 fps
29%
Quadro M500M:
9.9 10.2 ~ 10 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
18 fps 20 20.3 ~ 19 fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M2200:
12.7  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
82.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
32.8  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
19.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
12.7  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
108.8  fps
31%
Quadro M500M:
33.7 35 ~ 34 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
88.6  fps
26%
Quadro M500M:
22.9 23.4 ~ 23 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
74.8  fps
25%
Quadro M500M:
18.6 19.1 ~ 19 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
39.6  fps
23%
Quadro M500M:
9.2 9.6 ~ 9 fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
171.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.3  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
115.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.8  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
62.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
48.1  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
42.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
10.5  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
48.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
38.3  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
22.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
11.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
229.4 270.9 ~ 250 fps
36%
Quadro M500M:
89.1 89.9 94.9 ~ 91 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
174.1 177.2 ~ 176 fps
29%
Quadro M500M:
50.1 50.2 54 ~ 51 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
149.1 155.5 ~ 152 fps
28%
Quadro M500M:
40.3 40.5 43.8 ~ 42 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
56.8 58.6 ~ 58 fps
24%
Quadro M500M:
13.8 13.8 14.7 ~ 14 fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
217.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
93.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
48.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
24.2  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
381.4  fps
36%
Quadro M500M:
137.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
238.8  fps
26%
Quadro M500M:
62.7  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
149.3  fps
23%
Quadro M500M:
34.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.2  fps
25%
Quadro M500M:
17.3  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
Quadro M500M:
78.5  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
57  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro M500M:
45.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
27.5  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M500M → 28%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 28%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.16
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)