NVIDIA Quadro M620 vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M

NVIDIA Quadro M620

► remove

Die NVIDIA Quadro M620 ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 11_0) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Einstiegs-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 950M auf den GM107-Chip der Maxwell-Serie und wird in 28nm bei TSMC hergestellt. Sie ist die Nachfolgekarte der Quadro M600M und ähnelt der Quadro M1000M, jedoch mit weniger Grafikspeicher.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Derzeit sind noch keine genauen Taktraten bekannt, jedoch sollte sich die Quadro M620 etwa unterhalb der älteren Quadro M1000M einordnen, die ebenfalls 512 Shader besitzt und einen 128 Bit Speicherbus. Die Taktraten der M620 könnten jedoch niedriger ausfallen.

In ersten SPECviewperf 12 Benchmarks ist die M1000M im Durchschnitt 9 % schneller als die neue M620.

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M620 entspricht laut Nvidia der alten Quadro K620M und liegt bei 30 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption) bzw 21,2 Watt TDP. Dadurch ist die Karte auch für dünne und leichte Notebooks geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro M500M

► remove NVIDIA Quadro M500M

Die NVIDIA Quadro M500M ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 11_0) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Einstiegs-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 930M auf den GM108-Chip der Maxwell-Serie und wird in 28nm bei TSMC hergestellt. Der Unterschied zur ebenfalls GM108 basierten Quadro K620M ist nicht bekannt (ev nur ein Renaming).

Die Grafikkarte ist für die Skylake-Generation gedacht. Es werden bis zu 2 GB DDR3 als Grafikspeicher eingesetzt und über einen 64 Bit Speicherbus angebunden sind (anscheinend geringer getaktet da nur 14.4 vs 16 GB/s bei der K620M angegeben werden). 

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Derzeit sind noch keine genauen Taktraten bekannt, jedoch sollte sich die Quadro M500M durch den geringeren Speicherdurchsatz etwas hinter der Quadro K620M positionieren.

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M500M entspricht laut Nvidia der alten Quadro K620M und der schnelleren M600M und liegt bei 30 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption). Dadurch ist die Karte auch für dünne und leichte Notebooks geeignet.

Die Nvidia Quadro M500M wird anfangs nur in den Lenovo Thinkpad Yoga P40 und Thinkpad P50s Notebooks verbaut (siehe unsere Newsmeldung hierzu).

NVIDIA Quadro M620NVIDIA Quadro M500M
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
Quadro M Series
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 compare 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitectureMaxwellMaxwell
Cores512 - unified384 - unified
Core1018 MHz1029 - 1124 (Boost) MHz
Memory5012 MHz4004 MHz
Bus128 Bit64 Bit
MemoryGDDR5DDR3
Max. Memory2048 MB2048 MB
Shared Memorynono
DirectXDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), 5.0DirectX 12 (FL 11_0), 5.0
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Size2/32/3
Introduced13.01.2017 15.12.2015
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.de/object/mobile-works...

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
16 pt (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
968 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
862 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
126522 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 24523     avg: 33578     median: 33578 (5%)     max: 42633 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 11481     avg: 13620     median: 13620 (18%)     max: 15759 Points
min: 5986     avg: 6299     median: 6359 (8%)     max: 6491 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 20980     avg: 22120     median: 22119.5 (11%)     max: 23259 Points
min: 8211     avg: 8403     median: 8348 (4%)     max: 8703 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2694     avg: 2914     median: 2989 (9%)     max: 3059 Points
min: 1387     avg: 1401     median: 1391.5 (4%)     max: 1432 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2867     avg: 3067     median: 3130 (7%)     max: 3204 Points
min: 1585     avg: 1596     median: 1594.5 (4%)     max: 1610 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
163099 Points (22%)
min: 26395     avg: 38225     median: 40554 (5%)     max: 45396 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 4015     avg: 4118     median: 4140 (11%)     max: 4200 Points
min: 2350     avg: 2431     median: 2447 (6%)     max: 2478 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 3676     avg: 3761     median: 3801 (6%)     max: 3805 Points
min: 2222     avg: 2341     median: 2364.5 (4%)     max: 2412 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M620
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M620
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 15.6     avg: 16.5     median: 16.5 (9%)     max: 17.4 fps
min: 6.1     avg: 6.3     median: 6.3 (3%)     max: 6.5 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
min: 21     avg: 21.4     median: 21.4 (7%)     max: 21.7 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
min: 19.1     avg: 19.6     median: 19.6 (9%)     max: 20 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
56.6 fps (11%)
min: 28.4     avg: 28.7     median: 28.7 (5%)     max: 28.9 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M620
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M620
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
134 fps (15%)
67.9 fps (7%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan
60 fps (16%)
28.5 fps (8%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
65.2 fps (15%)
28.9 fps (7%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
58.6 fps (22%)
12.4 fps (5%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 482     avg: 658     median: 658 (7%)     max: 834 Samples/s
min: 328     avg: 353     median: 354 (4%)     max: 378 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 718     avg: 1079     median: 1079 (7%)     max: 1440 Samples/s
min: 618     avg: 804     median: 850 (6%)     max: 945 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2530 (6%)
min: 1690     avg: 1741     median: 1741 (4%)     max: 1792
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
45.2 Watt (9%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
48.8 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
58.8 Watt (13%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M620 → 100% n=41

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M500M → 57% n=41

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M620:
127.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
44.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
31.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M620:
15.7  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M620:
70.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
18.7  fps
Overwatch

Overwatch

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M500M:
49.1  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
28.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
22.2  fps
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M620:
59.2 60.4 ~ 60 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M620:
25.2 46.3 ~ 36 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
18.7 25.2 ~ 22 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
13.9 19.5 ~ 17 fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M620:
55.1 62.2 ~ 59 fps
51%
Quadro M500M:
30.3  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M620:
31.1 36.6 ~ 34 fps
55%
Quadro M500M:
18.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
17.8 20.4 ~ 19 fps
55%
Quadro M500M:
10.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
14.4  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M620:
4.9  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
46.9 65.4 ~ 56 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
32.4 38.2 ~ 35 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
19.2 20.2 ~ 20 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
11.9 13.1 ~ 13 fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
35.6  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
29.6  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
16.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
14.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M620:
110.6  fps
51%
Quadro M500M:
56.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M620:
64.3  fps
52%
Quadro M500M:
33.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
28.9  fps
53%
Quadro M500M:
15.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
24.4  fps
53%
Quadro M500M:
13  fps
low 1280x720
Quadro M500M:
27  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
21  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
10  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M620:
53.9  fps
56%
Quadro M500M:
29 30.5 ~ 30 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M620:
32.8  fps
55%
Quadro M500M:
17.9 18.9 ~ 18 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
18.6  fps
54%
Quadro M500M:
9.9 10.2 ~ 10 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
10 fps  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M620:
249  fps
33%
Quadro M500M:
82.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M620:
118.5  fps
28%
Quadro M500M:
32.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
62.1  fps
31%
Quadro M500M:
19.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
28.2  fps
45%
Quadro M500M:
12.7  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
33.7 35 ~ 34 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
22.9 23.4 ~ 23 fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
18.6 19.1 ~ 19 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
9.2 9.6 ~ 9 fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M620:
190.5  fps
33%
Quadro M500M:
62.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M620:
139.6  fps
34%
Quadro M500M:
48.1  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M620:
114.4  fps
37%
Quadro M500M:
42.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
17.8  fps
59%
Quadro M500M:
10.5  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M620:
51.7  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M620:
44.4  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M620:
27.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
11.7  fps
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M620:
192.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M620:
147.4  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M620:
126  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
39.1  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
48.9  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
38.3  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
22.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
11.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M620:
176.4  fps
52%
Quadro M500M:
89.1 89.9 94.9 ~ 91 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M620:
105.6  fps
48%
Quadro M500M:
50.1 50.2 54 ~ 51 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M620:
92.3  fps
46%
Quadro M500M:
40.3 40.5 43.8 ~ 42 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M620:
35.6  fps
39%
Quadro M500M:
13.8 13.8 14.7 ~ 14 fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
217.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
93.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
48.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
24.2  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
137.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
62.7  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M500M:
34.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
17.3  fps
Mafia 2

Mafia 2

2010
low 800x600
Quadro M500M:
78.5  fps
med. 1024x768
Quadro M500M:
57  fps
high 1360x768
Quadro M500M:
45.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M500M:
27.5  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M620 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M500M → 46%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 42%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.16
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Redaktion,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)