Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 2800H vs AMD 3020e

AMD Ryzen 7 2800H

► remove from comparison AMD R7 2800H

Der AMD Ryzen 7 2800H ist ein Mobilprozessor für Notebooks. Der SoC beinhaltet 4 Zen Kerne (Quad-Core CPU) welche mit 3,3 bis 3,8 GHz takten. Im Vergleich zum Ryzen 7 2700U ist der Basistakt deutlich höher (3,3 GHz versus 2,2 GHz), es wird DDR4-3200 Speicher unterstützt und der TDP ebenfalls (45 Watt versus 15 Watt). Die integrierte Grafikkarte bietet alle 11 CUs im Chip (=704 Shader) und wird AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile heissen. Die Leistung sollte durch den höheren TDP etwas oberhalb des Ryzen 7 2700U liegen, da die Turbo Taktraten dadurch wahrscheinlich im Schnitt länger gehalten werden können.

Durch den erhöhten Stromverbrauch (TDP konfigurierbar von 35 - 54 Watt), eignet sich der Ryzen 7 2800H nur für große und schwere Notebooks.

Detaillierte Informationen über die Raven Ridge APUs finden sie in unserem Launchartikel.

AMD 3020e

► remove from comparison AMD 3020e

Der AMD 3020e ist ein Mobilprozessor mit dem Codenamen Dali für schlanke Notebooks. Der SoC beinhaltet 2 Zen Kerne (Dual-Core CPU, ohne SMT / Hyperthreading = 2 Threads) die von 1,2 - 2,6 GHz getaktet werden. Der TDP ist spezifiziert mit 6 Watt. Dadurch eignet sich der SoC auch für die passiv gekühlte Laptops und Tablets. Der 3020e bietet 4 MB Level 3 Cache. Offiziell gehört er zur AMD 3000 Serie, jedoch basiert der SoC noch auf die Ryzen 2000 APUs (Zen 1) und wird in 14nm gefertigt.

Die integrierte Grafikkarte heisst schlicht "AMD Radeon Graphics", bietet 3 GPU Kerne (3 CUs) und wird mit maximal 1000 MHz getaktet. Sie entspricht technisch der AMD Radeon Vega 3.

Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt maximal DDR4-2400 (Dual Channel).

Die Performance des AMD 3020e sollte leicht oberhalb des AMD 3015e sich einordnen, da der 3020e einen deutlich höheren Boost Takt (+300 MHz) bietet. Jedoch wird kein SMT unterstützt. Der Speicher wird jedoch ebenfalls schneller angesprochen und auch Dual-Channel wird unterstützt. Auch die integrierte GPU wird mit 1000 MHz deutlich schneller getaktet (+400 MHz). Den AMD 3015e vergleicht AMD mit dem Intel Celeron N4120 (Quad-Core Atom) wodurch sich der 3020e ebenfalls in der Klasse der Intel Celeron Einstiegsprozessoren einordnen sollte.

Detaillierte Informationen über die Raven Ridge APUs finden sie in unserem Launchartikel.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 2800HAMD 3020e
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
CodenameZenZen
Serie: Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Zen
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 84 MB
» AMD Ryzen 7 2800H3.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e compare1.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD 3020e1.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 24 MB
AMD 3015e compare1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD 3015Ce compare1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2800H3.3 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 84 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD Athlon Silver 3050e compare1.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
» AMD 3020e1.2 - 2.6 GHz2 / 24 MB
AMD 3015e compare1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
AMD 3015Ce compare1.2 - 2.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Clock3300 - 3800 MHz1200 - 2600 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 82 / 2
TDP35 Watt6 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketAM4FT5
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1300 MHz)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.105 °C
ManufacturerAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) 3020e

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - 3020e
20.9 pt (25%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 3020e +
943 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 3020e +
603 Points (30%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 3020e +
236 Points (30%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 3020e +
369 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 3020e +
196 Points (2%)
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 3020e +
92 Points (28%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 3020e +
903 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 3020e +
29 s (6%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 3020e +
1232 Points (7%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
100%
1 3020e +
4963 MIPS (4%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 3020e +
2597 MIPS (31%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 3020e +
12.8 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 3020e +
65.3 fps (17%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 3020e +
1.2 fps (2%)
00.20.30.50.60.811.11.31.41.61.81.92.12.22.42.62.72.93Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 3020e +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 3020e +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 3020e +
1.1 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 3020e +
2964 Seconds (21%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 3020e +
1.6 sec (34%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 3020e +
17 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 3020e +
879 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 3020e +
2618 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 3020e +
24677 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 3020e +
24593 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 3020e +
26064 Points (22%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 3020e +
2128 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 3020e +
2961 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 3020e +
638 Points (28%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 3020e +
1188 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 3020e +
646 Points (29%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 3020e +
1195 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 3020e +
2809 Points (31%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 3020e +
4803 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 3020e +
min: 1532     avg: 1545     median: 1545 (2%)     max: 1558 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 3020e +
20692 Points (21%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 3020e +
105 Points (28%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 3020e +
12.6 Watt (2%)
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 3020e +
12.8 Watt (3%)
01234567891011121314Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 3020e +
15.3 Points per Watt (18%)

Average Benchmarks AMD 3020e → NAN% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 03. 20:51:15

#0 checking url part for id 10144 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12720 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.007s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#26 composed specs +0s ... 0.011s

#27 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#28 getting avg benchmarks for device 10144 +0s ... 0.011s

#29 got single benchmarks 10144 +0s ... 0.011s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.015s

#31 getting avg benchmarks for device 12720 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#34 got single benchmarks 12720 +0.012s ... 0.028s

#35 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.029s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.007s ... 0.037s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.014s ... 0.053s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.054s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.054s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.055s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.056s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.057s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.057s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.058s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.059s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.06s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.06s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.063s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.068s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.072s

#75 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.073s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.022s ... 0.094s

#77 return log +0.004s ... 0.098s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
.170
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Sebastian Jentsch,  8.09.2017 (Update: 19.05.2020)